While the facts and the attendant law are essential components of understanding litigation outcomes, extralegal factors, such as the experience of the attorney representing each party, are also significantly related. The authors assert that the capability of the attorney, as evidenced in previous litigation success, is more significant than experience alone. They test this assertion for the South African appellate court from 1970 to 2000. After controlling for the effects of a number of variables, the results suggest that the previous success of the advocate is a far better predictor of litigation outcomes than previous experience, litigant status, or court ideology.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright.1988. Organized interests and agenda setting in the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review82:1109-27.
2.
Cameron, Edwin.1987a. Judicial endorsement of apartheid propaganda: An enquiry into an acute case. South African Journal on Human Rights3:223-29.
3.
———. 1987b. Nude monarchy: The case of South Africa's judges. South African Law Journal3:338-46.
4.
———. 1982. Legal chauvinism, executive-mindedness and justice—L. C. Steyn's impact on South African law. South African Law Journal99:38-75.
5.
Caplan, Lincoln.1987. The tenth justice. New York: Knopf.
6.
Chamberlain, Ronald S.1987. Mixing politics and justice: The Office of Solicitor General . Journal of Law and Politics4:379-428.
7.
Corder, Hugh.1987. The Supreme Court: Arena of struggle? In The state of apartheid, ed. Wilmot G. James.Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
8.
———. 1989. The record of the judiciary (2). In Democracy and the judiciary, ed. Hugh Corder.Cape Town: Institute for a Democratic Alternative for South Africa.
9.
Davis, D.M.1987. The chief justice and the total onslaught. South African Journal on Human Rights3:229-33.
10.
Dugard, John.1978. Human rights and the South African legal order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Ellmann, Stephen.1992. In a time of trouble: Law and liberty in South Africa's state of emergency. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
12.
Flemming, Roy B., and Glen S. Krutz.2002. Repeat litigators and agenda setting on the Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science35:811-33.
13.
Forsyth, Christopher F.1985. In danger for their talents. Cape Town , South Africa: Juta and Co., Ltd.
14.
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review9:95-160.
15.
Hahlo, H.R., and Ellison Kahn.1968. The South African legal system and its background. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Co., Ltd.
16.
Harms, L.T.C.2001. What irritates judges?The Advocate14 (3): 24-26.
17.
Haynie, Stacia.1994. Resource inequalities and litigation outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court. Journal of Politics56:752-72.
18.
———. 1995. Resource inequalities and regional variation in litigation outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1986. Political Research Quarterly48:371-80.
19.
———. 2003. Judging in black and white: Decision-making in the South African appellate division, 1950-1990. New York: Peter Lange.
20.
Haynie, Stacia L., Donald R.Songer, C.Neal Tate, and Reginald R. Sheehan .2005. Winners and losers: Appellate court outcomes in a comparative perspective. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
21.
Hoffman, Malcolm A.1956. Government lawyer. New York: Bookman Associates.
22.
Johnson, Timothy R.2004. Oral arguments and decision making on the United States SupremeCourt. New York: State University of New York Press.
23.
Johnson, Timothy R., Paul J. Wahlbeck, and James F. Spriggs II.2006. The influence of oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review100:99-113.
24.
McGuire, Kevin.1995. Repeat players in the SupremeCourt : The role of experienced lawyers in litigation success. Journal of Politics57:187-96.
25.
———. 1998. Explaining executive success in the U.S. Supreme Court . Political Research Quarterly51:505-26.
26.
Nathan, C.J.M., M. Barnett, and A. Brink.1959. Rules and practice of the Supreme Court of South Africa. Johannesburg, South Africa: Juta and Co., Ltd.
27.
Nienaber, P.M.1995. Producing judgment in the appellate division. In The quest for justice: Essays in honour of Michael McGregor Corbett, Chief Justice for the Supreme Court of South Africa, ed. Ellison Kahn.Johannesburg, South Africa: Juta & Col, Ltd.
28.
Pritchett, C. Herman.1948. The Roosevelt court: A study in judicial politics and values 1937-1947. New York: Macmillan .
29.
Reyneke, J.M., and J.J. Henning.2006. Work of the Supreme Court of Appeal in 2003 and 2004. Manuscript.
30.
Salokar, Rebecca Mae.1995. Politics, law and the Office of the Solicitor General . In Government lawyers; the federal legal bureaucracy and presidential politics, ed. Cornell W. Clayton , 59-83. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
31.
Schubert, Glendon.1965. The judicial mind: Attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Court justices, 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
32.
———. 1974. The judicial mind revisited. New York : Oxford University Press.
33.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cheryl D. Reedy .1988. The Supreme Court and sex discrimination: The role of the solicitor general. Western Political Quarterly41:553-68.
34.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth .1992. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
———. 1996. The influence of stare decisis on the votes of United States Supreme Court justices. American Journal of Political Science40:971-1003.
36.
———. 2002. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited . New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Trengove, John.1988. Perspectives on the role of judges in a deeply divided society. In Democracy and the judiciary, ed. Hugh Corder.Cape Town: Institute for a Democratic Alternative for South Africa.
38.
Wahlbeck, Paul.1997. The life of the law: Judicial politics and legal change . Journal of Politics59:778-802.
39.
Wilkins, Richard G.1988. An officer and an advocate: The role of the solicitor general. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review21:1167-86.
