Contrary to a standard view that Hobbes recommends elimination of private opinion by enlarging fear of violent death, in Behemoth, his dialogue on the causes of the English Civil War, he shows how to shift the balance of hope and fear that can motivate obedience but also engender rebellion. By linking recent events to historical struggles for power, Hobbes's teacher transfers the student's fear of destruction at the hands of domestic “enemies” to all individuals as insatiable seekers of power. Meanwhile, the student's hope of security is shifted from real or imagined heroes to the depersonalized institutions of Restoration England.
Ahrensdorf, Peter J.2000. The fear of death and the longing for immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on human nature and the problem of anarchy. American Political Science Review94:579-93.
2.
Bacon, Francis.1968. Works. Vol. 3. Ed. J. Spedding, R. Ellis, and D. Heath.New York: Garrett Press.
3.
Baumgold, Deborah.1988. Hobbes's political theory. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Blits, J.1989. Hobbesian fear. Political Theory17:417-31.
5.
Borot, Luc.1996. History in Hobbes's thought. In The Cambridge companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Burgess, Glenn.1990. Contexts for the writing and publication of Hobbes's Leviathan . History of Political Thought11:675-702.
7.
Collins, Jeffrey R.2005. The allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Coltman, Irene.1962. Private men & public causes. London : Faber and Faber.
9.
Flinker, Noam.1989. The view from the devil's mountain: Dramatic tension in Hobbes's Behemoth. Hobbes Studies2:10-22.
10.
Garsten, Bryan.2006. Saving persuasion: A defense of rhetoric and judgment . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Goldsmith, M.M.1966. Hobbes's science of politics. New York : Columbia University Press.
12.
Hobbes, Thomas.1968. Leviathan. Ed. C. B. Macpherson.Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
13.
Hobbes, Thomas.1990. Behemoth or the long parliament. Ed. Ferdinand Tönnies.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Hobbes, Thomas.1991. Man and citizen (de homine and de cive). Ed. Bernard Gert.Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
15.
Hobbes, Thomas.1994. The elements of law: Human nature and de corpore politico . Ed. J. C. A. Gaskin.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
Holmes, Stephen.1990. Introduction to behemoth or the long parliament. Ed. Ferdinand Tönnies.Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
17.
James, Susan.1997. Passion and action: The emotions in seventeenth-century philosophy. Oxford, UK: Clarendon .
18.
Johnston, David.1986. The rhetoric of leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the politics of cultural transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Kahn, Victoria.1985. Rhetoric, prudence, and skepticism in the renaissance . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Kahn, Victoria, and Neil Saccamano.2006. Introduction. In Politics and the passions, 1500-1850, ed. Victoria Kahn, Neil Saccamano, and Daniela Coli.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Kateb, George.1989. Hobbes and the irrationality of politics. Political Theory17:355-91.
22.
Kraynak, Robert.1982. Hobbes's Behemoth and the argument for absolutism. American Political Science Review76:837-47.
23.
Lloyd, S.A.1992. Ideals as interests in Hobbes's leviathan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Lund, William R.1988. The historical and "politicall" origins of civil society: Hobbes on presumption and certainty. History of Political Thought9:223-35.
25.
Lund, William R.1992. Hobbes on opinion, private judgment and civil war. History of Political Thought13:51-72.
26.
MacGillivray, Royce.1970. Thomas Hobbes's history of the English Civil War: A study of Behemoth. Journal of the History of Ideas31:179-98.
27.
Miller, Ted, and Tracy B. Strong .1997. Meanings and contexts: Mr. Skinner's Hobbes and the English mode of political theory. Inquiry40:323-56.
28.
Overhoff, Jürgen.2000. Hobbes's theory of the will: Ideological reasons and historical circumstances. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
Robin, Corey.2004. Fear: The history of a political idea. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
Schochet, Gordon J.1990. Intending (political) obligation: Hobbes and the voluntary basis of society. In Thomas Hobbes and political theory, ed. Mary Dietz.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
31.
Skinner, Quentin.1996. Reason and rhetoric in the philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Slaughter, Thomas P.1984. Ideology and politics on the eve of the restoration: Newcastle's advice to Charles II. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
33.
Slomp, Gabriella.1990. Hobbes, Thucydides and the three greatest things. History of Political Thought11:568-86.
34.
Strauss, Leo.1952. The political philosophy of Hobbes: Its basis and its genesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Strauss, Leo.1953. Natural right and history. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
