This article examines how geographic proximity to the U.S.—Mexico border influences newspaper coverage of immigration issues. The authors investigate two questions: Do media organizations spatially proximate to the border offer more frequent coverage of Latino immigration than media organizations farther removed from the border? Do media organizations spatially proximate to the border offer more frequent coverage of the negative aspects of immigration than media organizations farther removed from the border? We find that news organizations closer to the border generate a higher volume of articles about Latino immigration, articles featuring the negative aspects of immigration, and articles regarding illegal immigration.
Adams, William.1986. Whose lives count? TV coverage of natural disasters. Journal of Communication36:113-22.
2.
Agrawal, Anup, and Charles Knoeber .1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis31:377-98.
3.
Arnold, R. Douglas.2004. Congress, the press, and political accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Baron, David P.2006. Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics90:1-36.
5.
Baumgartner, Frank, and Bryan Jones.1995. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Beck, AllenPaul, RussellJ. Dalton, and Robert Huckfeldt .1998. Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review92:111-26.
7.
Bendix, Jacob, and Carol Liebler.1999. Place, distance, and environmental news: Geographic variation in newspaper coverage of the spotted owl conflict. Annals of the Association of American Geography89:658-76.
8.
Borjas, George J.1999. Heaven's door: Immigration policy and the American economy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Bovitz, Gregory L., James N. Druckman, and Arthur Lupia.2002. When can a news organization lead public opinion? Ideology versus market forces in decisions to make news. Public Choice113:127-55.
10.
Branton, Regina, Gavin Dillingham, Johanna Dunaway, and Beth Miller.2007. Anglo voting on nativist ballot initiatives: The partisan impact of spatial proximity to the U.S. Mexico border. Social Science Quarterly88:868-81.
11.
Branton, Regina, and Johanna Dunaway . Forthcoming. English and Spanish-language media coverage of immigration: A comparative analysis. Social Science Quarterly.
12.
Branton, Regina, and Bradford Jones.2005. Reexamining Racial Attitudes:The Conditional Relationship Between Diversity and Socio-Economic Environment. American Journal of Political Science49:359-72.
13.
Cook, Timothy E.1998. Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Demsetz, Harold, and Lehn, Kenneth.1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences . Journal of Political Economy93:1155-77.
16.
Denton, Frank.1999. Crime coverage is tailor made for newspapers. In The local news handbook. Reston, VA: American Society of Newspaper Editors. http://www.asne.org/reports/1999localnewshandbook/Ch5SAFETY.html.
17.
Dunaway, Johanna. Forthcoming. Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage . Journal of Politics.
18.
Dunaway, Johanna, Marisa Abrajano, and Regina Branton.2007. Agenda setting, public opinion, and the issue of immigration reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
19.
Entman, Robert.1990. Modern racism and the images of blacks in local television news. Critical Studies in Mass Communications7:332-46.
20.
Entman, Robert, Barbara Langford, Debra Burns-Melican, Irma Munoz, Simone Boayue, Anita Raman, Brian Kenner, and Charles Merrit.1998. Mass media and reconciliation. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government.
21.
Gilliam, Franklin, and Shanto Iyengar.2000. Prime suspects: The impact of local television news on attitudes about crime and race. American Journal of Political Science44 (3): 560-73.
22.
Gilliam, Franklin, Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Oliver Wright.1996. Crime in black and white: The violent, scary world of local news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics1:6-3.
23.
Gilliam, Franklin, Nicholas Valentino, and Matthew Beckmann .2002. Where you live and what you watch: The impact of racial proximity and local television news on attitudes about race and crime. Political Research Quarterly55:755-80.
24.
Graber, Doris.2002. Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: CQ.
25.
Hamilton, James T.1998. Channeling violence: The economic market for violent television programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
---. 2004. All the news that's fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Hansemann, Henry.1998. Ownership of the firm. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Autumn.
28.
Himmelberg, C.P., R.G. Hubbard, and D. Palia.1999. Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics53 (3): 353-84.
29.
Huber, Paul.1967. The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability1:221-33.
30.
Iyengar, Shanto.1991. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder .1987. News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Iyengar, Shanto and Jennifer McGrady .2007. Media politics: A citizen's guide. New York: Norton.
33.
Iyengar, Shanto, Mark Peters, and Donald Kinder.1982. Experimental demonstrations of the "not-so-minimal" consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review76:848-57.
34.
Kahn, Kim, and Patrick Kenney.1999. The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
---. 2002. The slant of the news: How editorial endorsements influence campaign coverage and citizens' views of candidates."American Political Science Review96:381-94.
36.
Kim, Sei-Hill, Dietram Scheufele, and James Shanahan.2002. Think about it this way: Attribute agenda setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue . Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly79 (1): 7-25.
37.
Kaniss, Phyllis.1991. Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Landis, Richard, and Gary Koch.1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics33:159-74.
39.
Leighley, Jan E.2004. Mass media and politics: A social science perspective . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
Long, J. Scott.1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
41.
Martin, Shannon.1988. Proximity of event as factor in selection of news sources . Journalism Quarterly65:986-89.
42.
McCombs, M.E., and D. Shaw.1972. The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36:176-87.
43.
McManus, John H.1994. Market driven journalism: Let the citizens beware?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Molotoch, Harvey, and Marilyn Lester.1975. Accidental news: The great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. American Journal of Sociology81:235-60.
45.
Page, Benjamin I.1996. The mass media as political actors. PS: Political Science and Politics29 (1): 20-24.
46.
Patterson, Thomas.1993. Out of order. New York: Knopf.
Soroka, Stuart.2002. Issue attributes and agenda setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. World Association for Public Opinion Research14 (3): 264-85.
49.
Sparrow, Bartholomew H.1999. Uncertain guardians: The news media as a political institution . Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
50.
Stemler, Steve.2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation7 (17). Available from http://edresearch.org .
51.
Shoemaker, Pamela, and Stephen Reese.1996. Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
52.
Valentino, Nicholas, Vincent Hutchings, and Ismail White.2002. Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review96 (1): 75-90.
53.
Zaller, John.1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
