In this study, the authors test for the presence of bias during Fox News and CNN’s coverage of the 2004 national party conventions. The content analysis demonstrates that Fox News’s coverage was more favorable to the Republican Party than it was to the Democratic Party, while CNN’s coverage was more impartial. The authors also use panel data from the National Annenberg Election Survey to show how opinion change toward the 2004 presidential candidates was associated with exposure to cable television coverage of the national party conventions. These findings highlight the evolving role of the cable news media in presidential campaigns and elections.
Alterman, Eric.2001. The not obviously insane network. The Nation, September 13. http://www.thenation.com/doc/20011001/alterman.
2.
Alterman, Eric.2004. What liberal media? The truth about bias and the news . New York: Basic Books.
3.
Bae, Hyuhn-Suhck.1999. Product differentiation in cable news programming: The case in the cable national all-news networks. Journal of Media Economics12:265-77.
4.
Bagdikian, Ben H.2004. The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon.
5.
Barker, David C.2002. Rushed to judgment: Talk radio, persuasion, and American political behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Barkin, Steve M.2003. American television news: The media marketplace and the public interest. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
7.
Baron, David P.2006. Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics90:1-36.
8.
Barrett, Andrew W., and Lowell W. Barrington .2005. Bias in newspaper photograph selection. Political Research Quarterly58:609-18.
9.
Bernhardt, Dan, Stepfan Krasa, and Mattias Polborn .2006. Political polarization and the electoral effects of media bias. CESifo Working Paper No. 1798. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=892475 .
10.
Bozell, L. Brent.2004. Weapons of mass distortion: The coming meltdown of the liberal media. New York: Three Rivers Press.
11.
Bray, Margaret, and David M. Kreps .1987. Rational learning and rational expectations. In Arrow and the ascent of modern economics theory , ed. G R. Feiwel.London: MacMillan.
12.
Brock, David.2004. The Republican noise machine: Right wing media and how it corrupts democracy. New York: Crown.
13.
Carlson, Tucker.2003. Politicians, partisans, and parasites: My adventures in cable news. New York: Warner Books .
Collins, Scott.2004. Crazy like a FOX: The inside story on how Fox News beat CNN. New York: Penguin.
16.
D’Alessio, David, and Mike Allen.2000. Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication50:133-56.
17.
Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen.1998. The new media and American politics . New York: Oxford University Press .
18.
Della Vigna, Stefano, and Ethan Kaplan.2007. The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics123:1187-1234.
19.
DeMarzo, Peter M., Dimitri Vayanos, and Jeffrey Zwiebel .2003. Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics118:909-68.
20.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter .2003. The nightly news nightmare: Network television’s coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2000 . New York: Rowman and Littlefield .
21.
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M. Shapiro .2006. Media bias and reputation . Journal of Political Economy114:280-316.
22.
Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo.2005. A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics120:1191-1237.
23.
Hamilton, James T.2004. All the news that’s fit to sell. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Hofstetter, C. Richard.1976. Bias in the news: Network television news coverage of the 1972 election campaign. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
25.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Joseph Capella.2008. Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Kalb, Marvin.2001. One scandalous story: Clinton, Lewinsky, & 13 days that tarnished American journalism. New York: Free Press.
27.
Karabell, Zachary.1998. The rise and fall of the televised political convention. Discussion Paper D-33, the Joan Shorenstein Center at theJohn F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
28.
Kitty, Alexandra.2005. Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s war on journalism. New York: Disinformation Limited.
29.
Kuklinski, James H., and Lee Sigelman .1992. When objectivity is not objective: Network television news coverage of US senators and the "paradox of objectivity."Journal of Politics54:810-33.
30.
Lichter, S. Robert, and Richard E. Noyes .1995. Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism. New York : Rowman and Littlefield.
31.
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen M. McGraw, and Patrick Stroh.1989. An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review83:399-419.
32.
Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau.1995. The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review89:309-26.
33.
Lowry, Dennis T., and Jon A. Shidler .1995. The sound bites, the biters, and the bitten: An analysis of network Tv news bias in campaign ’92 . Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72:33-44.
34.
Maurer, Paul J.1999. Media feeding frenzies: Press behavior during two Clinton scandals. Presidential Studies Quarterly29:65-79.
35.
McConnell, Bill, and John Higgins.2004. Sinclair under siege. Broadcasting and Cable, October 25.
36.
McGraw, Kathleen M., Milton Lodge, and Patrick Stroh.1990. On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication. Political Behavior12:41-58.
37.
Morris, Jonathan S., and Peter L. Francia .2007. Losing control? The rise of cable news and its effect on party convention coverage. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age, ed. C. Panagopoulos, 147-64. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
38.
Niven, David.1999. Partisan bias in the media? A new test. Social Science Quarterly80:847-57.
39.
Niven, David.2001. Bias in the news: Partisanship and negativity in media coverage of Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics6:31-46.
40.
Niven, David.2002. Tilt? The search for media bias. Westport, CT: Praeger.
41.
Niven, David.2003. Objective evidence on media bias: Newspaper coverage of congressional party switchers. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly80:311-26.
42.
Page, Benjamin I.1996. Who deliberates?Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Panagopoulos, Costas.2007. Follow the bouncing ball: Assessing convention bumps, 1964-2004. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age, ed. C. Panagopoulos, 16-28. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
44.
Pew Research Center.2004. News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audiences larger, more diverse . News release. http://people-press.org/report/215/news-audiences-increasingly-politicized .
45.
Pew Research Center.2008. Key news audiences now blend online and traditional sources: Audience segments in a changing news environment. Survey report. http://people-press.org/report/444/news-media.
46.
Podhoretz, John.2004. Dan Rather’s day of reckoning. The Weekly Standard, October 4.
47.
Pomper, Gerald.2007. The new role of the conventions as political rituals. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age, ed. C. Panagopoulos, 189-208. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
48.
Project for Excellence in Journalism.2005 . The state of the news media. Annual report . http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2005/narrative_cabletv_audience.asp?cat=3&media=5.
49.
Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, and Eugene Borgida.1994. Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisals. American Political Science Review88:193-99.
50.
Salwen, Michael B., Bruce Garrison, and Paul D. Driscoll, eds. 2005. Online news and the public. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Scheuer, Jeffrey.2001. The sound bite society: How television helps the right and hurts and left. New York: Routledge .
52.
Sunstein, Cass R.2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
