Because Hispanic voters are seldom targeted for campaign communication and because they listen to radio at higher rates than non-Hispanics, Spanish-language radio represents an attractive venue for testing whether nonpartisan mass media messages can mobilize voters. We conducted a large-scale, national field experiment testing the impact of nonpartisan Spanish-language radio advertisements on Latino voter turnout in the 2006 congressional elections. The experiment, encompassing 206 congressional districts, indicates that nonpartisan radio ads represent an effective and cost-efficient means of raising Latino turnout in federal elections.
AbrajanoMarisa. 2010. Campaigning to the new American electorate: Advertising to Latino voters. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AngristJoshua D.ImbensGuido W.RubinDonald B.1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association91 (June): 444-55.
ArceneauxKevinNickersonDavid. 2009. Who is mobilized to vote? A re-analysis of 11 field experiments. American Journal of Political Science53:1-16.
5.
BarlowWilliam. 1998. Voice over: The making of black radio. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
6.
BarretoMatt. 2007. Si Se Puede! Latino candidates and the mobilization of Latino voters. American Political Science Review101 (3): 425-42.
7.
BerelsonBernard R.LazarsfeldPaulMcPheeWilliam. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CardyEmily A.2005. An experimental field study of the GOTV and persuasion effects of partisan direct mail and phone calls. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science601:28-40.
9.
Castaneda ParedesMari. 2003. The transformation of Spanish-language radio in the U.S. Journal of Radio Studies10:5-16.
10.
CoxGaryMungerMichael. 1989. Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections. American Political Science Review83 (1): 217-31.
11.
DaleAllisonStraussAaron. 2009. Don’t forget to vote: Text message reminders as a mobilization tool. American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 787-804.
12.
de la GarzaRodolfoBrichettoR.VaughanD.1983. The Mexican-American electorate: Information sources and policy orientations. The Mexican-American Electorate Series. Occasional Paper 2. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Center for Mexican American Studies.
13.
de la GarzaRodolfoFalconAngeloGarciaF. Chris. 1996. Will the real Americans please stand up: Anglo and Mexican American support for core American political values. American Journal of Political Science40:335-51.
14.
de la GarzaRodolfoMenchacaMarthaDeSipioLouis, eds. 1994. Barrio ballots: Latino politics in the 1990 elections. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
FileThom. 2008. Voting and registration in the election of November 2006. U.S. Census Bureau Population Report P20-557. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
17.
GarciaF. ChrisSanchezGabriel R.2008. Hispanics and the U.S. political system: Moving into the mainstream. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
18.
García BedollaLisaMichelsonMelissa R.2009. What do voters need to know? Testing the role of cognitive information in Asian American voter mobilization. American Politics Research37 (2): 254-74.
19.
GeerJohn G.GeerJames H.2003. Remembering attack ads: An experimental investigation of radio. Political Behavior25 (1): 69-95.
20.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2000. The effects of canvassing, direct mail, and telephone contact on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review94:653-63.
21.
GershtensonJoseph. 2003. Mobilization strategies of the Democrats and Republicans, 1956-2000. Political Research Quarterly55:687-714.
22.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlan S.2008. Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
23.
GreenDonald P.VavreckLynn. 2008. Analysis of cluster-randomized experiments: A comparison of alternative estimation approaches. Political Analysis16 (2): 138-52.
24.
GuernicaA.1982. Reaching the Hispanic market effectively. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
HeroRodneyGarciaF. ChrisGarciaJohnPachonHarry. 2000. Latino participation, partisanship and office-holding. PS: Political Science & Politics33:529-34.
26.
HerrnsonPaul S.2000. Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
LeighleyJan. 2001. Strength in numbers? The political mobilization of racial and ethnic minorities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
MaxwellScott E.DelaneyHarold D.2004. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
McCleneghanJ. Sean. 1987. Impact of radio ads on New Mexico mayoral races. Journalism Quarterly64:590-93.
31.
MichelsonMelissa. 2003. Getting out the Latino vote: How door-to-door canvassing influences voter turnout in rural central California. Political Behavior25 (3): 247-63.
32.
MichelsonMelissa. 2005. Meeting the challenge of Latino voter mobilization. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science601:85-101.
33.
MichelsonMelissa. 2006. Mobilizing the Latino youth vote: Some experimental results. Social Science Quarterly87 (5): 1188-1206.
34.
MortonRebecca. 1991. Groups in rational turnout models. American Journal of Political Science3:758-76.
35.
Multicultural Marketing Equation Study. 2007. Old and new media use. Florida State University/DMS Research Multicultural Research Program. http://hmc.comm.fsu.edu/OldandNewMedia091307.pdf (accessed June 8, 2008).
36.
OberfieldZacharySegalAdam. 2008. Pluralism examined: Party television expenditures focused on the Latino vote in presidential elections. In The mass media and Latino politics: Studies of U.S. media content, campaign strategies and survey research: 1984-2004, ed. Subervi-VelezFederico. New York: Taylor and Francis.
37.
OverbyL. MarvinBarthJay. 2006. Radio advertising in American political campaigns: The persistence, importance and effects of narrowcasting. American Politics Research34 (4): 451-78.
38.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2006. The impact of newspaper advertisements on voter turnout: Field experimental evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 1.
39.
PanagopoulosCostasGreenDonald. 2008. Field experiments testing the impact of radio advertisements on electoral competition. American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 156-68.
40.
PanagopoulosCostasWielhouwerPeter. 2008. Polls and elections: The ground war 2000-2004: Strategic targeting in grassroots campaigns. Presidential Studies Quarterly38 (2): 347-62.
41.
PutnamRobert. 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
42.
RamirezRicardo. 2005. Giving voice to Latino voters: A field experiment on the effectiveness of a national nonpartisan mobilization effort. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science601:66-84.
43.
RamirezRicardo. 2007. Mobilization en Español: Spanish-language radio and the activation of political identities. Paper presented at the Immigration Protests of 2006 Conference, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Industrial Relations, Berkeley, April 20.
44.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn M.1993. Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
SegalAdam. 2004. Bikini politics: The 2004 presidential campaigns’ Hispanic media efforts cover only the essential parts of the body politic: A select group of voters in a few battleground states. Report issued by the Hispanic Voter Project, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
47.
StevensDaniel. 2008. Measuring exposure to political advertising in surveys. Political Behavior30 (1): 47-72.
48.
StrachanCherie J.2003. High-tech grass roots: The professionalization of local elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49.
Subervi-VelezFederico A.1992. Republican and Democratic mass communication strategies: Targeting the Latino vote. In From rhetoric to reality: Latino politics in the 1988 elections, ed. de la GarzaR. O.DeSipioL.Boulder, CO: Westview.
50.
Subervi-VelezFederico A.2008a. Introduction. In The mass media and Latino politics: Studies of U.S. media content, campaign strategies and survey research: 1984-2004, ed. Subervi-VelezFederico. New York: Taylor and Francis.
51.
Subervi-VelezFederico A.2008b. Summary, conclusions and recommendations. In The mass media and Latino politics: Studies of U.S. media content, campaign strategies and survey research: 1984-2004, ed. Subervi-VelezFederico. New York: Taylor and Francis.
52.
SuroRoberto. 2004. Changing channels and crisscrossing cultures: A survey of Latinos on the news media. Pew Hispanic Media Study. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
53.
UhlanerCaroleCainBruceKiewietD. Roderick. 1989. Political participation of ethnic minorities in the 1980s. Political Behavior11:195-221.
54.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKayBradyHenry. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
