This article presents the results of a survey experiment fielded on a 1,000-person live interview telephone poll designed to test the effects of a racial frame on attitudes about the use of standardized tests in college admissions. Respondents were presented with one of two versions of a question about whether it is fair for colleges to always admit the candidate with higher standardized test scores when comparing two applicants. Both versions of the question informed respondents that talented students who face disadvantages in life may perform more poorly on standardized tests than similarly talented students who do not face disadvantages. The treatment version of the question additionally identified the students who face disadvantages as Black and Hispanic, and the students who do not as white. The treatment had a statistically significant effect. Respondents were more likely to rate basing admissions decisions on standardized tests as fair in the treatment version of the question than in the control. Further analysis of the data by race and party identification shows that direction of the effect is consistent across all groups but Hispanic respondents. Additional research and larger sample sizes are necessary to determine whether estimated differences in these effects are statistically significant.
AbramowitzAlan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. Yale University Press.
2.
AgadjanianAlexander. 2022. “How Many Americans Change Their Racial Identification over Time?” Socius8. doi:10.1177/23780231221098547
3.
BloomLackland H.2014. “Bakke, Grutter, Gratz (And Fisher).” In Do Great Cases Make Bad Law? edited by Bloom LacklandH.Jr.Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199765881.003.0020.
CarminesEdward C.LaymanGeoffrey C.. 1998. “When Prejudice Matters: The Impact of Racial Stereotypes on the Racial Policy Preferences of Democrats and Republicans.” In Perception and Prejudice, edited by HurwitzJonPeffleyMark, 100–134. Yale University Press. doi:10.12987/9780300143454-006.
7.
CramerKatherine. 2020. “Understanding the Role of Racism in Contemporary US Public Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science23 (1): 153–169. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-060418-042842.
8.
DeSanteChristopher D.Watts SmithCandis. 2020. “Less Is More: A Cross-Generational Analysis of the Nature and Role of Racial Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century.” The Journal of Politics82 (3): 967–80. doi:10.1086/707490.
9.
EndersAdam M.ScottJamil S.. 2019. “The Increasing Racialization of American Electoral Politics, 1988-2016.” American Politics Research47 (2): 275–303. doi:10.1177/1532673X18755654.
10.
EngelhardtAndrew M.2021. “Racial Attitudes Through a Partisan Lens.” British Journal of Political Science51 (3): 1062–1079. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000437.
11.
EnglishMicahKallaJoshua. 2021. “Racial Equality Frames and Public Policy Support: Survey Experimental Evidence.” OSF Preprints.
GarcesLiliana M.2015. “The Legal Context and Social Science Evidence in Fisher v. University of Texas.” In Affirmative Action and Racial Equity, edited by JayakumarUma M.GarcesLiliana M., 0 ed., 25–42. Routledge.
14.
GeiserSaul. 2017. NORM-REFERENCED TESTS and RACE-BLIND ADMISSIONS: The Case for Eliminating the SAT and ACT at the University of California. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California Berkeley.
15.
GilensMartin. 2017. “Chapter 7 Racial Attitudes and Race-Neutral Social Policies: White Opposition to Welfare and the Politics of Racial Inequality.” In Perception and Prejudice, edited by HurwitzJonPeffleyMark, 171–201. Yale University Press. doi:10.12987/9780300143454-008.
GreenDonald P.PalmquistBradleySchicklerEric. 2002. “Partisan Hearts and Minds Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters.” In Yale ISPS Series. Yale University Press. doi:10.12987/9780300132007.
18.
HopkinsDavid AGrossmanMatt. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001.
19.
HutchingsVincent L.PistonSpencer. 2011. “The Determinants and Political Consequences of Prejudice.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by LupiaArthurGreeneDonald P.KuklinskiJames H.DruckmanJames N., 306–319. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921452.022.
20.
JardinaAshleyOllerenshawTrent. 2022. “The Polls—Trends.” Public Opinion Quarterly86 (S1): 576–587. doi:10.1093/poq/nfac021.
21.
JohnstonRichard. 2006. “PARTY IDENTIFICATION: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?” Annual Review of Political Science9 (1): 329–351. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523.
22.
JunnJaneMendelbergTaliCzajaErica. 2012. “Race and the Group Bases of Public Opinion.” In New Directions in Public Opinion, edited by BerinskyAdam J., Vol. 20. Routledge.
23.
KamCindy D.BurgeCamille D.. 2019. “TRENDS: Racial Resentment and Public Opinion across the Racial Divide.” Political Research Quarterly72 (4): 767–784. doi:10.1177/1065912919870280.
24.
KinderDonald R.SandersLynn M.. 1996. “Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals.” In American Politics and Political Economy. University of Chicago Press.
25.
KuklinskiJames H.SnidermanPaul M.KnightKathleenPiazzaThomasTetlockPhilip E.LawrenceGordon R.MellersBarbara. 1997. “Racial Prejudice and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action.” American Journal of Political Science41 (2): 402. doi:10.2307/2111770.
McCartyNolan M.PooleKeith T.HowardRosenthal.. 2006. Polarized America : The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. The Walras-Pareto Lectures. MIT Press.
29.
MendelbergTali. 2017. “The Impact of Implicit Messages.” In The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton University Press.
30.
MiratrixLuke W.SekhonJasjeet S.TheodoridisAlexander G.CamposLuis F.. 2018. “Worth Weighting? How to Think about and Use Weights in Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis26 (3): 275–291. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.1.
31.
ParkJulie J.KimBrian HeseungWongNancyZhengJiaBreenStephanieLoPearlBakerDominique J.RosingerKellyNguyenMike HoaPoonOiYan A.. 2024. “Inequality Beyond Standardized Tests: Trends in Extracurricular Activity Reporting in College Applications Across Race and Class.” American Educational Research Journal. doi:10.3102/00028312241292309
32.
PolsbyNelson W.2004. How Congress Evolves : Social Bases of Institutional Change. Oxford University Press.
33.
SantoroHelen. 2022. “US Supreme Court Poised to Ban Affirmative Action in University Admissions.” Nature611 (7935): 215. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-03470-5.
34.
SearsDavidSidaniusJimBoboLawrence. 2000. Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America. University of Chicago Press.
35.
SidesJohnTeslerMichaelVavreckLynn. 2017. “How Trump Lost and Won.” Journal of Democracy28 (2): 34–44. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0022.
36.
SidesJohnTeslerMichaelVavreckLynn. 2018. “Hiding in Plain Sight.” In Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, NED-New Ed., 69–96. Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvktrvp5.8.
37.
SidesJohnTausanovitchChrisVavreckLynn. 2022. “Change (And More of the Same).” In The Bitter End: The 2020 Presidential Campaign and the Challenge to American Democracy, 214–245. Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv2f9xt08.10.
SoaresJoseph A.2012. SAT Wars: The Case for Test-Optional College Admissions. Teachers College Press.
40.
StokerLaura. 2017. “Chapter 6 Understanding Whites’ Resistance to Affirmative Action: The Role of Principled Commitments and Racial Prejudice.” In Perception and Prejudice, edited by HurwitzJonPeffleyMark, 135–70. Yale University Press. doi:10.12987/9780300143454-007.
41.
TeslerMichael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science56 (3): 690–704. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00577.x.
42.
ValantJonNewarkDaniel A.. 2016. “The Politics of Achievement Gaps: U.S. Public Opinion on Race-Based and Wealth-Based Differences in Test Scores.” Educational Researcher45 (6): 331–346. doi:10.3102/0013189X16658447.
43.
ValellyRichard M.2004. The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. University of Chicago Press.
44.
ValentinoNicholas ASearsDavid O. 2005. “Old Times There Are Not Forgotten: Race and Partisan Realignment in the Contemporary South.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 672–688. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00136.x.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
