Reforms among Republicans in the House of Representatives have led to changes in deciding who should become committee chair. While factors such as party unity and campaign contributions have been demonstrated to matter, bipartisanship has yet to be analyzed. Using party cartel theory and information theory, it is hypothesized that those that are higher in bipartisanship will be more likely to become committee chair on non-power committees but will be less likely to become committee chair on power committees. Conditional logistic analysis of the 107th through the 114th Congress finds bipartisanship has a positive effect on becoming chair of a non-power committee but no effect on power committees. This analysis demonstrates the utility of combining multiple theoretical frameworks for understanding Congress.
BaronK. M.2022. “Informal and Private: Bargaining and Veto Threats Over the Freedom of Information Act.” Congress and the Presidency49 (1): 165–99.
4.
BattagliniM.LaiE. K.LimW.WangJ. T. Y.. 2019. “The Informational Theory of Legislative Committees: an Experimental Analysis.” American Political Science Review113 (1): 55–76.
5.
BeckerL. A.MoscardelliV. G.. 2008. “Congressional Leadership on the Front Lines: Committee Chairs, Electoral Security, and Ideology.” PS: Political Science & Politics41 (1): 77–82.
6.
BednarczukM.2026. Replication Data for: The Strategic Value of Compromise: Bipartisanship and Committee Leadership in the U.S. House. Harvard Dataverse, Vol. 1, UNF:6:I1Ubx5GIZxNkdV+U65YaoA== [fileUNF]. doi: 10.7910/DVN/OAML4Y.
CannD. M.2008a. “Modeling Committee Chair Selection in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Analysis16 (3): 274–89.
9.
CannD. M.2008b. Sharing the Wealth: Member Contributions and the Exchange Theory of Party Influence in the US House of Representatives. State University of New York Press.
10.
CoxG. W.McCubbinsM. D.. 2007. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Cambridge University Press.
11.
CraigA. W.2023. The Collaborative Congress: Reaching Common Ground in a Polarized House. Cambridge University Press.
12.
CurryJ. M.2019. “Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in the Contemporary Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly44 (2): 203–37.
13.
CurryJ. M.2022. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. University of Chicago Press.
14.
CurryJ. M.LeeF. E.. 2020. The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era. University of Chicago Press.
15.
EdwardsG. C.III. 2021. “Was Donald Trump an Effective Leader of Congress?” Presidential Studies Quarterly51 (1): 184–209.
16.
EisslerR. M.RutledgeP. E.. 2026. “Power Play: the Agenda Dynamics of the United States President, House of Representatives, and Senate.” Policy Studies Journal54 (1): e70036.
17.
FennoR. F.1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Little, Brown and Company.
18.
FennoR. F.1973. Congressmen in Committees. Little, Brown and Company.
19.
GilliganT. W.KrehbielK.. 1987. “Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: an Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization3 (2): 287–335.
20.
Harbridge-YongL.2021. “Review of the Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era, by J. M. Curry, and F. E. Lee.” Political Science Quarterly136 (3): 559–61.
21.
Harbridge-YongL.VoldenC.WisemanA. E.. 2023. “The Bipartisan Path to Effective Lawmaking.” The Journal of Politics85 (3): 1048–63.
22.
HittM. P.VoldenC.WisemanA. E.. 2017. “Spatial Models of Legislative Effectiveness.” American Journal of Political Science61 (3): 575–90.
23.
HuntC. R.2022. Home Field Advantage: Roots, Reelection, and Representation in the Modern Congress. University of Michigan Press.
24.
KogerG.LeboM. J.. 2017. Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology. University of Chicago Press.
25.
KornbergM.2023. Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process. Columbia University Press.
26.
KrehbielK.1992. Information and Legislative Organization. University of Michigan Press.
27.
KrehbielK.1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of US Lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.
28.
KrehbielK.2004. “Legislative Organization.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives18 (1): 113–28.
29.
LaPiraT. M.DrutmanL.KosarK. R.. 2020. Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform. University of Chicago Press.
30.
LewallenJ.2020. Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress. University of Michigan Press.
31.
ManleyJ. F.1970. The Politics of Finance: The House Committee on Ways and Means. Little, Brown and Co.
32.
McLainM.2024. “The Traceability of Presidential Policymaking in the Face of Congressional Sanctioning.” Political Research Quarterly77 (4): 1415–30.
33.
ParkH. M.2012. “Why Does the Majority Party Bother to Have Minority Party Members on Committees?” Journal of Theoretical Politics24 (2): 248–64.
34.
PolsbyN. W.1968. “The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review62 (1): 144–68.
35.
PolsbyN. W.GallaherM.RundquistB. S.. 1969. “The Growth of the Seniority System in the US House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review63 (3): 787–807.
36.
RobertsJ. M.2010. “The Development of Special Orders and Special Rules in the US House, 1881-1937.” Legislative Studies Quarterly35 (3): 307–36.
37.
RohdeD. W.1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. University of Chicago Press.
38.
SalaB.2003. “Party Loyalty and Committee Leadership in the House, 1921-1940.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, edited by BradyD.McCubbinsM., 166–94. Stanford University Press.
39.
SchicklerE.PearsonK.. 2009. “Agenda Control, Majority Party Power, and the House Committee on Rules, 1937-52.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (4): 455–91.
40.
SinclairB.2016. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. 5th ed.CQ Press.
41.
SmithL. E.2021. “Trump and Congress.” Policy Studies42 (5-6): 528–43.
42.
SmithS. S.RickertP.. 2025. “Just One of Those Things: Parties and Exclusive Committees in the US House.” Studies in American Political Development39 (1): 26–43.
43.
StewartC.WoonJ.. 2017. Congressional Committee Assignments, 103rd to 114th Congresses, 1993–2017.
44.
TesoE.2025. “Influence-Seeking in US Corporate Elites' Campaign Contribution Behavior.” The Review of Economics and Statistics107 (3): 685–96.
45.
VoldenC.WisemanA. E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
