Diagnosis in Marriage and Family Counseling: An Ethical Double Bind

Abstract

The increasing influence of third-party payers over the diagnostic and treatment practices in the field of mental health counseling has created several ethical dilemmas for marriage and family counselors. In particular, the required use of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) for diagnoses places counselors in the position of misdiagnosing individuals in order to provide counseling for the family. This article is the first of two and overviews some of the primary ethical dilemmas associated with diagnosis in the field of marriage and family counseling. Part 2 will introduce case vignettes and apply an ethical lens to the issues described in the overview.

Keywords

diagnosis family counseling counseling ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Counseling Association (ACA) . (1995). Code of ethics and standards of practice. Alexandria, VA: Author.

American Psychiatric Association (APA) . (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Barstow, S. , Alpert, D. , & Campbell, C. (2004, May). Washington update. Counseling Today, 46(11), 1, 34, 38.

Bray, J. H. (1995). Current issues in evaluating families. Family Relations, 44, 469-478.

Chiu, T. L. (1996). Problems caused for mental health professionals worldwide by increasing multicultural populations and proposed solutions. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 24, 129-140.

Christensen, L. L. , & Miller, R. B. (2001). Marriage and family therapists evaluate managed mental health care: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 509-514.

Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) . (2001). The 2001 standards. Retrieved July 7, 2004, from http://www.counseling.org/cacrep/

Gergen, K. J. , Hoffman, L. , & Anderson, H. (1996). Is diagnosis a disaster? A constructionist trialogue. In F. W. Kaslow (Ed.), Handbook of relational diagnosis (pp. 102-118). New York: John Wiley.

Grotevant, H. D. , & Carlson, C. I. (1989). Family assessment: A guide to methods and measures. New York: Guilford.

10.

Hamann, E. E. (1994). Clinicians and diagnosis: Ethical concerns and clinician competence. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 259-260.

11.

Hohenshil, T. H. (1996). Role of assessment and diagnosis in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75, 64-67.

12.

International Association of Marriage and Family Counselors (IAMFC) . (2002). Ethical standards. Retrieved July 5, 2004, from http://www.iamfc.com/ethical_codes.html

13.

L’Abate, L. (1994). Family evaluation: A psychological approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Melito, R. (2003). Values in the role of the family therapist: Self determination and justice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 3-11.

15.

Nichols, M. P. , & Schwartz, R. C. (2001). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

16.

Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517-535.

17.

Shumway, S. T. , Wampler, R. S. , Dersch, C. , & Arredondo, R. (2004). A place for marriage and family services in employee assistance programs (EAPs): A survey of EAP client problems and needs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 71-79.

18.

Sue, D. W. , Ivey, A. E. , & Pedersen, P. B. (1996). A theory of multicultural counseling and therapy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

19.

Sue, D. W. , & Sue, D. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. New York: John Wiley.