Understanding couples' relationship problems is fundamental to couple therapy. Although research has documented common relationship problems, no study has used open-ended questions to explore problems in couples seeking therapy in naturalistic settings. The present study used a reliable coding system to explore the relationship problems reported by 108 couples. The most common problems were related to communication, emotional affection or distance, specific areas of the current relationship, and lack of physical affection or sex. Comparisons of therapeutic mandates revealed that commitment or security problems and infidelity or flirting problems were more common among couples pursuing an ambivalence resolution mandate than among couples pursuing an alleviation of distress mandate. Results demonstrated the importance of identifying distinct therapeutic mandates in couple therapy.
AllenE. S.AtkinsD. C.BaucomD. H.SnyderD. K.GordonK. C.GlassS. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 101–130.
2.
BattleC. C.ImberS. D.Hoehn-SaricR.StoneA. R.NashE. R.FrankJ. D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184–192.
3.
BoisvertJ. M.LadouceurR.BeaudryM.FreestonM. H.TurgeonL.TardifC.LorangerM. (1995). Perception of marital problems of and their prevention by Quebec young adults. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 33–44.
4.
Clarke-StewartA.BrentanoC. (2006). Divorce: Causes and consequences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
DossB. D.AtkinsD. C.ChristensenA. (2003). Who’s dragging their feet? Husbands and wives seeking marital therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 165–177.
6.
DossB. D.SimpsonL. E.ChristensenA. (2004). Why do couples seek marital therapy?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 608–614.
7.
GeissS. K.O'LearyK. D. (1981). Therapist ratings of frequency and severity of marital problems: Implications for research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 515–520.
8.
GordonK. C.BaucomD. H.SnyderD. K. (2004). An integrative intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 213–231.
9.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
HelmekeK. B.SprenkleD. H. (2000). Clients' perceptions of pivotal moments in couples therapy: A qualitative study of change in therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 469–483.
11.
HenryR. G.MillerR. B. (2004). Marital problems occuring in midlife: Implications for couples therapists. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 405–417.
12.
HsuehA. C.MorrisonK. R.DossB. D. (2009). Qualitative reports of problems in cohabiting relationships: Comparisons to married and dating relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 236–246.
13.
LevensonR. W.CarstensenL. L.GottmanJ. M. (1993). Long-term marriage: Age, gender, and satisfaction. Psychology and Aging, 8, 301–313.
14.
MillerR. B.YorgasonJ. B.SandbergJ. G.WhiteM. B. (2003). Problems that couples bring to therapy: A view across the family life cycle. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 395–407.
15.
MondorJ.SabourinS.WrightJ.Poitras-WrightH.McDuffP. (2011). Premature disengagement from couple therapy in a naturalistic setting: The role of therapeutic mandates and attachment representations, Manuscript submitted for publication.
16.
Poitras-WrightH.St-PèreF. (2004). Grille d'évaluation des mandats en thérapie pour la recherche sur l'efficacité de la consultation conjugale [A therapeutic mandate evaluation grid for use in research on the effectiveness of couple therapy]. Unpublished document.
17.
SabourinS.LussierY.LaplanteB.WrightJ. (1990). Unidimensional and multidimensional models of dyadic adjustment: A hierarchical reconciliation. Psychological Assessment, 2, 333–337.
18.
ShadishW. R.BaldwinS. A. (2005). Effects of behavioral marital therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 6–14.
19.
SnyderD. K.CastellaniA. M.WhismanM. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317–344.
20.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
21.
Statistics Canada. (2006). 2006 Census of population. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 97-563-XCB2006054.
22.
StoraasliR. D.MarkmanH. J. (1990). Relationship problems in the early stages of marriage: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 80–98.
23.
TremblayN.WrightJ.SabourinS.MamodhoussenS.McDuffP. (2008). Refining therapeutic mandates in couple therapy outcome research: A feasibility study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 137–148.
24.
WeissR. L.HeymanR. E. (1990). Observation of marital interaction. In FinchamF. D.BradburyT. N. (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: Basic issues and applications (pp. 87–117). New York: Guilford Press.
25.
WhismanM. A.BeachS. R. H.SnyderD. K. (2008). Is marital discord taxonic and can taxonic status be assessed reliably? Results from a national representative sample of married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 745–755.
26.
WhismanM. A.DixonA. E.JohnsonB. (1997). Therapists' perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 361–366.
27.
WrightJ.SabourinS.MondorJ.McDuffP.MamodhoussenS. (2007). The clinical representativeness of couple therapy outcome research. Family Process, 46, 301–316.
