Abilities are as important as interests in career choice and development. Reviving cognitive assessment in career counseling promises to help counselees better understand their career options and how to enhance their competitiveness for the ones they prefer. Nearly a century of research on human cognitive abilities and jobs' aptitude demands in the U.S. economy reveals that the two domains are structured in essentially the same way. The author describes that common structure and how it can be used in assessing person-job match in terms of general ability level and ability profile. She also suggests ways of resolving various technical and professional questions, such as which cognitive abilities to assess, how to assess them, what the most useful aptitude-based occupational classification would be, and how to use cognitive assessments in a broader “reality-based exploration” process intended to expand people's career opportunities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (1999). Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 777-786.
2.
Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22(2), 227-257.
3.
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 218-245.
4.
Austin, J. T., & Hanisch, K. A. (1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: A longitudinal analysis using Project TALENT data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 77-89.
5.
Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Brody, N. (in press-a). Construct validation of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (STAT): Comment and reanalysis. Intelligence.
7.
Brody, N. (in press-b). What Sternberg should have concluded. Intelligence.
8.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1998). Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 989-1015.
10.
Dawis, R. V. (2002). Person-environment-correspondence theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 427-464). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Furnham, A. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: Culture and gender difference in self and other estimates of both general (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1381-1405.
12.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Gottfredson, G. D., & Holland, J. L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland occupational codes (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1978). An analytical description of employment according to race, prestige, and Holland type of work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, 210-221.
15.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1980). Construct validity of Holland's occupational typology in terms of prestige, census, Department of Labor, and other classification systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(6), 697-714.
16.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations [Monograph]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545-579.
17.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1985a). Education as a valid but fallible signal of worker quality: Reorienting an old debate about the functional basis of the occupational hierarchy. In A. C. Kerchoff (Ed.), Research in sociology of education and socialization (Vol. 5, pp. 119-165). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
18.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1985b). A system for reality-based career exploration: Methods and materials (Technical report for Grant NIE-83-0002). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
19.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1986a). Occupational aptitude patterns map: Development and implications for a theory of job aptitude requirements [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 254-291.
20.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1986b). Special groups and the beneficial use of vocational interest inventories. In W. B. Walsh & S. Osipow (Eds.), Advances in vocational psychology, Vol. 1: The assessment of interests (pp. 127-198). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1996a). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 179-232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1996b, Winter). What do we know about intelligence? The American Scholar, pp. 15-30.
23.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13-23.
24.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997b). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79-132.
25.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1998, Winter). The general intelligence factor. Scientific American Presents, 9(4), 24-29.
26.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2000). Intelligence. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology, Vol. 2 (2nd ed., pp. 1359-1386). New York: Macmillan Reference.
27.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2002a). g: Highly general and highly practical. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 331-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2002b). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 85-148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The science and politics of intelligence in gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 24-40). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Gottfredson, L. S. (in press-a). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence.
31.
Gottfredson, L. S. (in press-b). On Sternberg's “Reply to Gottfredson.” Intelligence.
32.
Hartigan, J. A., & Wigdor, A. K. (Eds.). (1988). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
34.
Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 250-261.
35.
Humphreys, L. G., & Yao, G. (2002). Prediction of graduate major from cognitive and self-report test scores obtained during the high school years. Psychological Reports, 90, 3-30.
36.
Hunt, E. (2001). Multiple views of multiple intelligence [Review of the book Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligence in the 21st century]. Contemporary Psychology, 46(1), 5-7.
37.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
38.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
39.
Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
40.
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718-729.
41.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
42.
Peterson, G. W., Sampson, J. P., Jr., Lenz, J. G., & Reardon, R. C. (2002). A cognitive information processing approach to career problem solving and decision making. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 312-369). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2000). On the dimensional structure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 313-320.
44.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2001). Behavioral genetics (4th ed.). New York: Worth and W. H. Freeman.
45.
Roberts, R. D., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2001). Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence: Some new data and conclusions. Emotion, 1, 196-231.
46.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
47.
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.
48.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
49.
Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Wigdor, A. K., & Garner, W. R. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Part I: Report of the committee. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
