A Qualitative Inquiry Into Decisions to Leave Engineering Among Korean Women With Engineering Degrees

Abstract

The longstanding underrepresentation of women in engineering fields is a global issue. The present study explores the experiences of 15 Korean women who earned engineering degrees and then changed their careers to non-engineering fields. Participants completed semi-structured interviews, and qualitative data from these interviews were analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods. Five domains emerged from the data: psychosocial struggles, anticipated difficulties in engineering, systemic gender marginalization, perceived lack of support, and deciding to leave. These findings reveal the underlying dynamics of environmental, socio-cognitive, and affective factors that not only influence non-persistence but also shape women’s experiences of leaving engineering and navigating alternative career paths. Participants’ decisions to leave were influenced by structural and cultural barriers, such as gender discrimination, anticipated challenges as women, and limited opportunities for advancement. The results highlight the need for gender-inclusive culture, supportive environments, and meaningful representation to improve retention and equity for women in engineering. This study offers important implications for practice and research in supporting women in engineering and advancing gender diversity within the field.

Keywords

women in engineering Korean women gender diversity consensual qualitative research career transition experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayre

Mills

Gill

(2013). ‘Yes, I do belong’: The women who stay in engineering. Engineering Studies, 5(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2013.855781

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, 2.

Britton

D. M.

(2017). Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society, 31(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216681494

Buse

Bilimoria

Perelli

(2013). Why they stay: Women persisting in US engineering careers. Career Development International, 18(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2012-0108

Byars-Winston

Rogers

J. G.

Branchaw

Pribbenow

C. M.

Hanke

Pfund

(2018). New measures assessing predictors of academic persistence for historically underrepresented racial/ethnic undergraduates in science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar50. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0183

Cadaret

M. C.

Hartung

P. J.

Subich

L. M.

Weigold

I. K.

(2017). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002

Chan

Rottmann

Moore

Radebe

(2022). Who identifies as an engineering leader? Exploring influences of gender, race, and professional experience . In ASEE 2022 Annual Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, Minneapolis, MN, 26–29 June 2022. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--41852

Cheryan

Ziegler

S. A.

Montoya

A. K.

Jiang

(2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052

Dennehy

T. C.

Dasgupta

(2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114

10.

Fernando

Cohen

Duberley

(2018). What helps? Women engineers’ accounts of staying on. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12192

11.

Flores

L. Y.

Navarro

R. L.

Lee

B. H.

Diaz

Martinez

(2021). Social cognitive predictors of Latinx and White engineering students’ academic satisfaction and persistence intentions: Exploring interactions among social identities and institutional context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127(3), Article 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103580

12.

Flores

L. Y.

Navarro

R. L.

Lee

H. S.

Luna

L. L.

(2014). Predictors of engineering-related self-efficacy and outcome expectations across gender and racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007902

13.

Flores

L. Y.

Troyka

Lee

(2023). Building program structures to advance vocational research on women. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(6), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231175194

14.

Fouad

N. A.

Chang

W. H.

Wan

Singh

(2017). Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875

15.

Fouad

N. A.

Kozlowski

M. B.

Singh

Linneman

N. G.

Schams

S. S.

Weber

K. N.

(2020). Exploring the odds: Gender differences in departing the engineering profession. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719876892

16.

Fouad

N. A.

Singh

Cappaert

Chang

W. H.

Wan

(2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92(3), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002

17.

Gladstone

J. R.

Cimpian

(2021). Which role models are effective for which students? A systematic review and four recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of role models in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00315-x

18.

Gregor

Dunn

Campbell-Halfaker

Martin-Fernandez

Ferrer

Robinson

(2023). Plugging the leaky pipeline: A qualitative investigation of untenured female faculty in STEM. Journal of Career Development, 50(2), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453221101588

19.

Hill

C. E.

(Ed.), (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association.

20.

Jung

Kim

J. Y. E.

(2020). Women in engineering: Almost no gap at university but a long way to go for sustaining careers. Sustainability, 12(20), 8299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208299

21.

Kali

P. K.

Piaget

Baller

Zahidi

(2023). Global gender gap report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf

22.

Kim

M. S.

Yang

J. W.

Yon

K. J.

(2016). Qualitative research on career choices and graduate program experience of female graduate students in Science and Engineering. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 28(1), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2016.02.28.1.191

23.

Kim

Lee

H. S.

(2024). Group differences in the structural relationships of efficacy, emotion, and interpersonal influence on female students’ career aspirations based on the proportion of female faculty in engineering majors. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 31(4), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2024.04.31.4.85

24.

Korea Foundation for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology . (2023). Analysis report on the statistics of development and utilization of women and men in ICT. https://www.wiset.or.kr/module/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/thumbnail/pblcte/TP_20231221091059482Ft91.pdf

25.

Korean Ministry of Science and ICT . (2023). 2021 report on the status of women in science, engineering, and technology. Korea Foundation for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology.

26.

Lee

H. S.

Flores

L. Y.

Navarro

R. L.

Kanagui-Muñoz

(2015). A longitudinal test of social cognitive career theory’s academic persistence model among Latino/a and White men and women engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.003

27.

Lee

H. S.

Flores

L. Y.

Navarro

R. L.

Suh

H. N.

(2018). Development and validation of the negative outcome expectations scale in engineering (NOES-E). Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679923

28.

Lee

H. S.

(2019). The structural relations of engineering students perceived career barrier, engineering self-efficacy and academic persistence across gender. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 26(8), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.21509/kjys.2019.08.26.8.231

29.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

30.

Lent

R. W.

Miller

M. J.

Smith

P. E.

Watford

B. A.

Lim

R. H.

Hui

(2016). Social cognitive predictors of academic persistence and performance in engineering: Applicability across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.012

31.

Lin

Deemer

E. D.

(2021). Stereotype threat and career goals among women in STEM: Mediating and moderating roles of perfectionism. Journal of Career Development, 48(5), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319884652

32.

Martinez

Christnacht

(2024). Women making gains in STEM occupations but still underrepresented. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov

33.

Navarro

R. L.

Flores

L. Y.

Lee

H. S.

Gonzalez

(2014). Testing a longitudinal social cognitive model of intended persistence with engineering students across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.007

34.

Navarro

R. L.

Flores

L. Y.

Legerski

J.-P.

Brionez

May

S. F.

Suh

H. N.

Slivensky

D. R.

Tapio

Lee

H.-S.

Garriott

P. O.

Hunt

H. K.

Desjarlais

C. D.

Lee

B.-H.

Diaz

Zhu

Jung

A.-K.

(2019). Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions, satisfaction, and engagement. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000319

35.

Kyun

Lee

(2019). A comparative study on the development of female manpower in science and technology fields between Korea and China. Korea Institution for international Economic Policy. https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a10101080000&bid=0001&list_no=2447&act

36.

Parkman

(2016). The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16(1), 51–60.

37.

Schmader

(2023). Gender inclusion and fit in STEM. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-043052

38.

Settles

I. H.

Jones

M. K.

Buchanan

N. T.

Brassel

S. T.

(2022). Epistemic exclusion of women faculty and faculty of color: Understanding scholar (ly) devaluation as a predictor of turnover intentions. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1914494

39.

Shiang

L. S.

Ngo

(2020). Unconscious and unseen barriers: A gender study of Malaysian women engineers. In International journal of communication, management and humanities AID conference proceedings (pp. 108–117).

40.

Society of Women Engineers . (2024). State of women in engineering. https://research.swe.org

41.

UNESCO . (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377250

42.

Williams

E. N.

Hill

C. E.

(2012). Establishing trustworthiness in consensual qualitative research. In Hill

C. E.

(Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 69–80). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13720-005

43.

Yon

K. J.

Yang

J. W.

Lee

J. S.

Jang

A. K.

Kim

J. K.

(2013). Differences in perceived career barriers by gender and affiliation (undergraduate, graduate): A study focusing on a science and engineering university. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 18(2), 295–316.