Do cultural factors moderate the relationship between sexual orientation and gender-related personality traits? To answer this question, the authors assessed gender-related traits in 90 gay men, 82 lesbians, 71 heterosexual men, and 95 heterosexual women from three cultural groups: Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, and White Americans. Among the gender-related traits measured were gender diagnosticity (GD), which assesses maleversus female-typicality of occupational and hobby preferences; self-ascribed masculinity and femininity; masculine instrumentality; and feminine expressiveness. We found strong homosexual-heterosexual differences on GD measures, moderate to strong differences in self-ascribed masculinity and femininity, and weak and inconsistent differences on instrumentality and expressiveness. Participants from traditional, gender-polarized cultures (Asians and Hispanics) tended to show larger heterosexual-homosexual differences in gender-related traits than participants from a nontraditional and gendernonpolarized culture (American Whites).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, J. M. (1995). Biological perspectives on sexual orientation. In A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 102-135). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bailey, J. M., Finkel, E., Blackwelder, K., & Bailey, T. (1996). Masculinity, femininity, and sexual orientation. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
3.
Bailey, J. M.,& Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43-55.
4.
Bem, D. J. (1996). Exotic become erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 320-335.
5.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Berry, J. W. (1980). Introduction to methodology. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Blanchard, R. (1997). Birth order and sibling sex ratio in homosexual versus heterosexual males and females. Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 27-67.
8.
Blanchard, R., & Klassen, P. (1997). H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185, 373-378.
9.
Blanchard, R., Zucker, K. J., Siegelman, M., Dickey, R., & Klassen, P. (1998). The relation of birth order to sexual orientation in men and women. Journal of Biosocial Science, 30, 511-519.
10.
Bohan, J. S. (1996). Psychology and sexual orientation: Coming to terms. New York: Routledge.
11.
Bolton, R. (1994). Sex, science, and social responsibility: Cross-cultural research on same-sex eroticism and social intolerance. Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 134-190.
12.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis& J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Carrier, J. (1976). Cultural factors affecting urban Mexican male homosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5, 103-124.
14.
Ch’u, T. (1987). The position of women in China. In L. H. Nelson (Ed.), The human perspective: Readings in world civilization (Vol. 1, pp. 85-109). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15.
Cole, S. W., Kemeny, M. E.,& Taylor, S. E. (1997). Social identity and physical health: Accelerated HIV progression in rejection-sensitive gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 320-335.
16.
Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development?Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55-107.
17.
Diamond, M. (1993). Homosexuality and bisexuality in different populations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 291-310.
18.
Duley, M. I., & Edwards, M. (Eds.). (1986). The cross-cultural study of women: A comprehensive guide. New York: Feminist Press.
19.
Ellis, L. (1996a). Theories of homosexuality. In R. C. Savin-Williams & K. M. Cohen (Eds.), The lives of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: Children to adults (pp. 11-34). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
20.
Ellis, L. (1996b). The role of perinatal factors in determining sexual orientation. In R. C. Savin-Williams & K. M. Cohen (Eds.), The lives of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: Children to adults (pp. 35-69). FortWorth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
21.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Kagan, J. (1964). Acquisition and significance of sex-typing and sex-role identity. In M. L. Hoffman& L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1, pp. 137-167). New York: Russell Sage.
23.
Kite, M. E.,& Deaux, K. (1984). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 11, 83-96.
24.
Kitzinger, C. (1995). Social constructionism: Implications for gay and lesbian psychology. InA. R. D’Augelli& C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 136-161). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82-173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T.,& Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Lippa, R. (1991). Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains and relationship to the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1000-1011.
28.
Lippa, R. (1995). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1184-1202.
29.
Lippa, R. A. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the “people-things” dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009.
30.
Lippa, R. A. (2000). Gender-related traits in gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women: The virtual identity of homosexual-heterosexual diagnosticity and gender diagnosticity. Journal of Personality, 68, 899-925.
31.
Lippa, R.,& Arad, S. (1997). The structure of sexual orientation and its relation to masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: Different for men and women. Sex Roles, 37, 187-208.
32.
Lippa, R., & Connelly, S. C. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051-1065.
33.
McDonald, G. J. (1984). Identity congruity and identity management among gay men. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
34.
McKnight, J. (1997). Straight science: Homosexuality, evolution, and adaptation. New York: Routledge.
35.
Meyer-Bahlbur, H. (1984). Psychoendocrine research on sexual orientation: Current status and future options. Progress in Brain Research, 61, 375-398.
36.
Miller, E. M. (2000). Homosexuality, birth order, and evolution: Towards an equilibrium reproductive economics of homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 1-34.
37.
Morales, E. S. (1990). Ethnic minority families and minority gays and lesbians. Marriage and Family Review, 14, 217-239.
38.
Morales, E. S. (1992). Latino gays and latina lesbians. In S. Dworkin & F. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Counseling gay men and lesbians (pp. 125-139). Alexandria, VA: American Association of Counseling and Development.
39.
Markow, T. A. (1994). Developmental instability, its origins and evolutionary implications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
40.
Pescatello, A. (Ed.). (1973). Female and male in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
41.
Pillard, R. C. (1991). Masculinity and femininity in homosexuality: “ Inversion” revisited. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 32-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Ross, M. W. (1983). Societal relationships and gender role in homosexuals: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 273-278.
43.
Spence, J. T.,& Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
44.
Storms, M. D. (1979). Sex role identity and its relationship to sex role attributions and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1779-1789.
45.
Suinn, R. M., Rickard-Figueroa, K., Lew, S., & Vigil, P. (1987). The Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale: An initial report. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 401-407.
46.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990a). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Williams, J. E.,& Best, D. L. (1990b). Measuring sex stereotypes: Amultinational study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
