In 1896 Boas argued that “if anthropology desires to establish laws governing the growth of culture it must not confine itself to comparing the results of the growth alone, but whenever such is feasible it must compare the processes of growth” (p. 280). However, later it was argued that evolutionary inferences could not and should not be made from synchronic data. But is the comparative evolutionary method of anthropology entirely illegitimate? In this article, the authors test this hypothesis using synchronic and diachronic data on kinship organization and terminology from the Circum-Mediterranean region. This test appears to support the idea that inferences about specific evolutionary developments can be made on the basis of a synchronic association. Contrary to most anthropological discourse of the recent decades, the authors maintain that a synchronic association can serve as a sound basis for making inferences about specific evolutionary developments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amir'jants, I. A. (1979). Araby juzhnogo Iraka [Arabs of Southern Iraq]. Rasy i narody, 9, 223-237.
2.
Amir'jants, I. A. (1999). Iraktsy [The Iraqis]. In V. A. Tishkov (Ed.), Narody i religii mira (pp. 193-194). Moscow: Bol'shaja Rossijskaja Entsiklopedija.
3.
Boas, F. (1940). The limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. In F. Boas (Ed.), Race, language, and culture (pp. 261-283). New York: Macmillan. (Originally published 1896)
4.
Bradley, C., Moore, C. C., Burton, M. L., & White, D. R. (1989). A cross-cultural historical study of subsistence change. World Cultures, 5(3), files STDS49.COD, STDS49.DAT.
5.
Bradley, C., Moore, C. C., Burton, M. L., & White, D. R. (1990). A cross-cultural historical study of subsistence change. American Anthropologist, 92, 105-115.
6.
Burton, M. L., Moore, C. C., Whiting, J. W. M., & Romney, A. K. (1996). Regions based on social structure. Current Anthropology, 37, 87-123.
7.
Carneiro, R. L. (1969). The measurement of cultural development in the ancient Near East and in Anglo-Saxon England. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II, 31, 1013-1023.
8.
Chlenov, M. A. (1999). Evrei [The Jews]. In V. A. Tishkov (Ed.), Narody i religii mira (pp. 167-169). Moscow: Bol'shaja Rossijskaja Entsiklopedija.
9.
Dal', V. I. (1989). Tolkovyj slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo jazyka (Vols. 1-4). Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
10.
de Munck, V., & Korotayev, A. (2000). Cultural units in cross-cultural research. Ethnology, 39, 335-348.
11.
Divale, W. T. (2001). Standard cross-cultural sample variables. World Cultures, 12(2), STDS01-87.SAV.
12.
Ember, M., & Ember, C. R. (1983). Marriage, family, and kinship. Comparative studies of social organization. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
Goldenweiser, A. (1937). Anthropology. New York: F. S. Crofts.
15.
Hays, D. G. (1998). The measurement of cultural evolution in the nonliterate world. Homage to Raoul Naroll. New York: Metagram Press.
16.
Henke, R. (1973). Appendix to Naroll, 1973. In R. Naroll & F. Naroll (Eds.), Main currents in cultural anthropology (pp. 355-360). New York: Appleton.
17.
Kirej, N. I. (1996). Etnografija arabov Perednej Azii i Severnoj Afriki [Ethnography of the Arabs of West Asia and North Africa]. Krasnodar, Russia: KubGU.
18.
Korotayev, A. (2003). Unilineal descent organization and deep Christianization: A cross-cultural comparison. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 133-157.
19.
Korotayev, A., & Kazankov, A. (2000). Regions based on social structure: A reconsideration (or apologia for diffusionism). Current Anthropology, 41, 668-690.
20.
Korotayev, A., Kazankov, A., Dreier, L., & Dmitrieva, N. (2003). An apologia for the comparative evolutionary method of anthropology. World Cultures, 14(1).
21.
Krasnovskaja, N. A. (1989). Narody Italii [Peoples of Italy]. In Ju. V. Ivanova (Ed.), Brak u narodov Zapadnoj i Juzhnoj Evropy (pp. 107-133). Moscow: Nauka.
22.
Krasnovskaja, N. A. (1999). Ital'jantsy [The Italians]. In V. A. Tishkov (Eds.), Narody i religii mira (pp. 200-201). Moscow: Bol'shaja Rossijskaja Entsiklopedija.
23.
Krjukov, M. V. (1968). Tipy rodstva i ih istoricheskoe sootnoshenie [Kinship types and their historical correlation]. In L. V. Danilova (Ed.), Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskih obshchestv (pp. 352-383). Moscow: Nauka.
24.
Krjukov, M. V. (1972). Sistema rodstva kitajtsev [Chinese Kinship System]. Moscow: Nauka.
25.
Krjukov, M. V. (1995). Sinhronno-diahronnyj metod i kontseptsija transformatsionnoj mnogolinejnosti sistem rodstva [Synchronic-diachronic method and the concept of kinship system transformational multilinearity]. In V. A. Popov (Ed.), Algebra rodstva (Vol. 1, pp. 111-137). St. Petersburg, Russia: Kunstkamera.
26.
Lenski, G. (1966). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Mandelbaum, M. (1971). History, man, and reason: A study in nineteenth-century thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Marano, L. A. (1973). A macrohistoric trend toward world government. Behavior Science Notes, 8, 35-39.
29.
Moiseev, A. I. (1963). Terminy rodstva v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Kinship terms in modern Russian]. Filologicheskie nauki, (3), 120-132.
30.
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Macmillan.
31.
Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas: A summary. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
32.
Murdock, G. P. (1970). Kin term patterns and their distribution. Ethnology, 9, 165-207.
33.
Murdock, G. P. (1985). Kin term patterns and their distribution. World Cultures, 1(4), fileSTDS25.DAT.
34.
Murdock, G. P., Textor, R., Barry, H., III, White, D. R., Gray, J. P., & Divale, W. (1999-2000). Ethnographic atlas. World Cultures, 10(1), 24-136, files AT01-09.SAV; 11(1), file EA10.SAV.
35.
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329-369.
36.
Murdock, G. P., & Wilson, S. F. (1972). Settlement patterns and community organization: Cross-cultural codes 3. Ethnology, 11, 254-295.
37.
Murdock, G. P., & Wilson, S. F. (1985). Settlement patterns and community organization: Cross-cultural codes 3. World Cultures, 1(1), STDS3.DAT.
38.
Nisbet, R. A. (1969). Social change and history: Aspects of the Western theory of development. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Ozhegov, S. I. (1978). Slovar' russkogo jazyka [Dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.
40.
Pershits, A. I. (1958). Araby Iraka [The Arabs of Iraq]. Sovetskaja Etnografija, (5), 77-90.
41.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1941). The study of kinship systems. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 71, 49-89.
42.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1950). Introduction. In A. R. Radcliffe-Brown & D. Forde (Eds.), African systems of kinship and marriage (pp. 1-85). London: Oxford University Press.
43.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society. London: Cohen & West.
44.
Sanderson, S. K. (1990). Social evolutionism. A critical history. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
45.
Shmajlova, N. (1999). Sravnitel'nyj analiz istoricheskogo razvitija sistem terminov rodstva v russkom i arabskom yazykah [Comparative analysis of historical evolution of kinship terminology in Russian and Arabic]. Unpublished master's thesis, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow.
46.
Sumnikova, N. I. (1969). Terminy rodstva i svojstva v sovremennom russkom jazyke [Kinship and affinity terms in modern Russian]. Russkaja Rech', 2, 117-122.
47.
Van Ess, J. (1956). The spoken Arabic of Iraq (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
48.
Vlasova, I. V. (1987). Sem'ja [Family]. In K. V. Chistov (Ed.), Etnografija vostochnyh slavjan (pp. 361-371). Moscow: Nauka.
49.
White, D. R., Burton, M. L., Bradley, C., & Moore, C. C. (1989). World-system linkages in the standard sample. World Cultures, 5(3), files STDS47-52.COD, STDS47-52.DAT.
50.
Zor'ko, F., Majzel', B. N., & Skvortsova, N. A. (1998). Nuovo dizionario Italiano-Russo [New Italian-Russian dictionary].Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
