Dow and Eff recently reported high levels of network autocorrelation for over eleven hundred and fifty variables coded for the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS) with respect to five distinct measures of network proximity: distance, language, cultural complexity, religion, and ecological niche. Most of the variables were discrete, either binary or ordinal, as are the vast majority of variables in all cross-cultural samples. A large percentage showed significant levels of autocorrelation with respect to two or more networks simultaneously. One implication of these findings is that there is a need in comparative research for statistical models that can deal with binary and ordinal dependent variables while simultaneously controlling for one or more autocorrelation process. The current paper suggests one such regression modeling procedure and applies it in a reanalyses of the causes of polygyny. Both spatial autocorrelation by itself, and spatial and language autocorrelation in combination, were found to be significant predictors of polygyny.
Aldrich, J.H., & Nelson, F. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models. Sage Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 45. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Anselin, L., & Bera, A.K. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
3.
Anselin, L., Florax, R.J.G., & Rey, S.J. (2004). Econometrics for spatial models: Recent advances . In L. Anselin, R. J. G. Florax, & S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics (pp. 1-24). Heidelberg , Germany: Springer-Verlag.
4.
Beron, K.J., & Vijverberg, W.P. (2004). Probit in a spatial context . In L. Anslein, R. J. G. Floax, & S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics (pp. 169-192). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
5.
Bolduc, D., Fortin, B., & Gordon, S. (1997). Multinomial probit estimation of spatially interdependent choices: An empirical comparison of two new techniques. International Regional Science Review, 20, 77-101.
6.
Bollen, K. (1996). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109-121.
7.
Bondarenko, D., & Korotayev, A. (2000). Family size and community organization: A cross-cultural comparison. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 152-184.
8.
Bound, J., Jaeger, D.A., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variable estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 90, 443-450.
9.
Burton, M.L. (1999). Language and region codes for the Standard Cross Cultural Sample. Cross-Cultural Research, 33, 63-83.
10.
Case, A., Rosen, H.S., & Hines, J. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 53, 285-307.
11.
De Munk, V.C., & Korotayev, A.V. (2007). Wife-husband intimacy and female status in cross-cultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 307-335.
12.
Dow, M.M. (1984). A bi-parametric approach to network autocorrelation: Galton's problem. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 201-217.
13.
Dow, M.M. (2007). Galton's problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 336-363.
14.
Dow, M.M., Burton, M.L., White, D. & Reitz, K. (1984). Galton's problem as network autocorrelation. American Ethnologist, 11, 754-770.
15.
Dow, M.M., & Eff, E.A. (2008). Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Cross-Cultural Research , 42, 148-171.
16.
Ember, M., Ember, C.R., & Low, B.S. (2007). Comparing explanations of polygyny. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 328-440.
17.
Fleming, M.M. (2004). Techniques for estimating spatially dependent discrete choice models. In L. Anslein, R. J. Floax, & S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics (pp. 145-166). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Kelejian, H.H., & Prucha, I.R. (1998). A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics , 17, 99-121.
21.
Kim, J., & Feree, G.D. (1981). Standardization in causal analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 10, 187-210.
22.
Lee, G.R. (1979). Marital structure and economic systems. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 701-713.
23.
Liao, T.F. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Sage University Paper Series No. 101 . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Long, J.S., & Freese. J. (2003). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
26.
McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion .) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 42, 109-142.
Murdock, G.P., & Morrow, D. (1970). Subsistence economy and supportive practices: Cross-cultural codes. Ethnology, 9, 302-330.
29.
Osmond, M.E. (1965). Toward monogamy: A cross-cultural study of correlates of type of marriage. Social Forces, 44, 8-16.
30.
Pregibon, D. (1981). Logistic regression diagnostics. Annals of Statistics, 9, 705-724.
31.
Rivers, D., & Vuong. Q. (1988). Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics , 39, 347-366.
32.
Sanderson, S. (2001). Explaining monogamy and polygyny in human societies: Comment on Kanazawa and Still. Social Forces, 80, 329-336.
33.
Spencer, P. (1980). Polygyny as a measure of social differentiation in Africa. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.), Numerical techniques in social anthropology (pp. 117-160). Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues .
34.
StataCorp. (2006). Stata Statistical Software Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
35.
Verdon, M. (1983). Polygyny, descent, and local fission: A comparative hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 1-22.
36.
Vuong, Q. (1984). Two-stage conditional maximum likelihood estimation of econometric models. Social Science Working Paper 538. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.
37.
White, D.R. (1988). Rethinking polygyny: Co-wives, codes, and cultural systems. Current Anthropology, 29, 529-572.
38.
White, D.R., & Burton. M.L. (1988). Causes of polygyny: Ecology, economy, kinship, and warfare. American Anthropologist, 90, 871-887.
39.
White, D.R., Burton, M.L., & Dow, M.M. (1981). Sexual division of labor in African agriculture . American Anthropologist, 83, 824-849.
40.
Winship, C., & Mare, R.D. (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49, 512-525.
