This study examined the degree to which hunter-gatherers exhibited concern for animals. Six types of concern (sympathy, consequential, identity-based, respectful, protective, and indifference) were assessed in twenty-eight hunting-gathering groups from around the world using eHRAF World Cultures. Findings demonstrated that sympathy for animal agents was low, and indifference was high. High levels of consequential concern and moderate levels of identity and respectful concern were evident. Protective concern was found in about a third of the groups. Higher levels of concern were experienced when the animals were perceived as either pseudo-humans or pseudo-spirits. The transition from hunter-gatherer to agro-industrial lifestyle has led to fewer interactions and less overall concern for animals, but it has not produced a decrease in sympathy for animal agents, which was already relatively low among foragers. These findings lend support to the theory that humans did not evolve to experience high levels of sympathetic concern for animals as animal agents, and it helps to explain the widespread present exploitation of animals. It also demonstrates that concern can and does arise when animals take on pseudo-human agency.
AdriaenseJ. E. C.KoskiS. E.HuberL.LammC. (2020). Challenges in the comparative study of empathy and related phenomena in animals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.021
2.
AllegriF. (2022). Relations. Beyond anthropocentrism (2021). LED Edizioni Universitarie.
3.
AlvardM. S. (1993). Testing the ecologically noble savage? Hypothesis: Interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology, 21(4), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891140
BarrettC. (2016). Adaptations to predators and prey. In BussD. (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology. (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 200–223). Wiley.
9.
BastianB.LoughnanS.HaslamN.RadkeH. R. M. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291
10.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy. (pp. 3–15). Boston Review. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
11.
BekoffM. (2004). Wild justice and fair play: Cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. Biology and Philosophy, 19(4), 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/sBIPH-004-0539-x
12.
BerkesF.FolkeM. K.CarlGadgilM. (1998). Minireviews: Exploring the basic ecological unit: Ecosystem-like concepts in traditional societies. Ecosystems, 1(5), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900034
13.
BieseleM.BarclayS. (2001). Ju/’hoan women’s tracking knowledge and its contribution to their husbands’ hunting success. In African study monographs. ary issue (Issue No. 26, pp. 67–84). Research Committee for African area studies, Kyoto University. https://ehrafworldcultures-yale-edu.felix.albright.edu/document?id=fx10-068
14.
BloomP. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion (1st ed.). Ecco, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers.
15.
Blurton-JonesN.KonnerM. (1976). Bushman knowledge of animal behavior. In LeeR.DeVoreI. (Eds.), Kalahari hunter-gatherers (pp. 325–348). Harvard University Press.
16.
BoyerP. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Basic Books.
17.
BoyerP. (2003). Religious thought and behavior as byproducts of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 119–124.
18.
BradshawJ.PaulE. (2010). Could empathy for animals have been an adaptation in the evolution of Homo sapiens?Animal Welfare, 19(S1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096272860000230X
19.
BrightmanR. A. (1993). Grateful prey: Rock Cree human-animal relationships. University of California Press.
20.
BrownD. (1991). Human Universals. McGraw Hill.
21.
CallicottJ. (1991) The wilderness Idea Revisited: The Sustainable development alternative (13, pp. 235–247). Environmental Professional.
22.
CareyS. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.
23.
CaviolaL.EverettJ. A. C.FaberN. S. (2019). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182
24.
ChagnonN. A. (2012). The yanomamo (6th ed). Cengage.
25.
CikaraM.BruneauE.Van BavelJ.SaxeR. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125.
26.
CristE.Center for Environmental Philosophy, The University of North Texas. (2004). Against the social construction of nature and wilderness: Environmental Ethics, 26(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200426138
De LagunaF. (1972). Under Mount Saint Elias: The history and culture of the Yakutat Tlingit. In Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology (Vol. 7, p. 3 v. [i-xxiv, 1-548; xxix–xli, 549-914; xlvii–xlix, 915-1395], plates). Smithsonian Institution Press; [for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.]. https://ehrafworldcultures-yale-edu.felix.albright.edu/document?id=na12-020
DescartesR. (2007). Descartes: From the Letters of 1646 and 1649. In KalofL.FitzgeraldA. (Eds.), The animals reader (pp. 59–62). Berg. (Original work published 1646).
32.
DescolaP. (2013). Beyond nature and culture: Univ. Chicago Press.
De WaalF. B. M.FerrariP. F. (2010). Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.003
35.
DhontK.HodsonG.LeiteA. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model(Sd–harm). European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069
36.
DhontK.HodsonG.LoughnanS.AmiotC. E. (2019). Rethinking human-animal relations: The critical role of social psychology. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219864455
37.
DouglasM. (2005). Purity and danger: An analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
38.
EliadeM. (1972). Shamanism: Archaic techniques of ecstasy. Princeton University Press. eHRAF World Cultures. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu
Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations. (2021). World food and agriculture—Statistical yearbook 2021. Food & Agriculture Org.
42.
GaytonA. H. (1946). Culture-environment integration: External references in yokuts life. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 2(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.2.3.3628717
43.
GigerenzerG. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. Viking.
44.
GlockerM. L.LanglebenD. D.RuparelK.LougheadJ. W.GurR. C.SachserN. (2009). Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology, 115(3), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01603.x
45.
GusindeM. (1931). The fireland indians: Vol. 1. The selk’nam, on the life and thought of a hunting people of the great island of tierra del fuego (Vol. 1). Verlag. (Original work published 1931).
HerzogH. (2010). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: Why it’s so hard to think straight about animals (1st ed). Harper.
48.
HoffmanD. D. (2019). The case against reality: Why evolution hid the truth from our eyes (1st ed.). W.W. Norton & Company. Independent Publishers since 1923.
49.
IngoldT. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(8), 1796–1810. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40156
50.
IngoldT. (2011). From trust to domination: An alternative history of human-animal relations. In ManningA.SerpellJ. (Eds.), Animals and human society: Changing perspectives (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
JordanM. R.AmirD.BloomP. (2016). Are empathy and concern psychologically distinct?Emotion, 16(8), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000228
53.
KahnemanD. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin Books.
54.
KalofL.FitzgeraldA. J. (Eds.), (2007). The animals reader: The essential classic and contemporary writings.
55.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
56.
KellertS.WilsonE. (Eds.), (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
57.
KnowltonT. W.RobertsS. G. (2023). Explaining mythical composite monsters in a global cross-cultural sample. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(aop), 1-24.
KopninaH. (2020). Human/environment dichotomy. In CallanH. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology (pp. 1–9). John Wiley and Sons.
62.
KurzbanR. (2010). Why everyone (Else) is a hypocrite: Evolution and the modular mind. Princeton University Press.
63.
LaakasuoM.SundvallJ. R. I.BergA.DrosinouM.HerzonV.KunnariA.KoverolaM.RepoM.SaikkonenT.PalomäkiJ. (2021). Moral psychology and artificial agents (Part one): Ontologically categorizing bio-cultural humans. In ThompsonS. J. (Ed.), Advances in human and social aspects of technology (pp. 166–188). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4894-3.ch010
64.
LeopoldA. (1989). A Sand County almanac and sketches here and there (Special commemorative ed). Oxford Univ. Pr.
PandaB.LeepsaN. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467
PlousS. (2003). Is there such as thing as prejudice towards animals? In Understanding Prejudice and discrimination (pp. 509–528). McGraw-Hill.
80.
Prato-PrevideE.Basso RicciE.ColomboE. S. (2022). The complexity of the human–animal bond: Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism in human–animal relationships and animal hoarding. Animals, 12(20), 2835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202835
81.
PrgudaE.NeumannD. (2014). Inter-human and animal-directed empathy: A test for evolutionary biases in empathetic responding. Behavioural Processes, 108, 80–86. ISSN 0376-6357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.012
82.
ReganT. (2004). The case for animal rights (Updated with a new preface, [2004 ed.]). University of California Press.
83.
RichersonP. J.BoydR. (2010). The Darwinian theory of cultural evolution and gene- culture coevolution. In BellM. A.FutuymaD. J.EanesW. F.LevintonJ. S.. (Eds.), Evolution since Darwin: The first 150 years. Sinauer. [.Google Scholar].
84.
SerpellJ. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge University Press.
85.
SerpellJ. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection—beyond the “cute response.” Society and Animals, 11(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853003321618864
86.
SheldrakeM. (2020). The ‘enigma’ of Richard Schultes, Amazonian hallucinogenic plants, and the limits of ethnobotany. Social Studies of Science, 50(3), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720920362
87.
ShepardP. (1993). On animal friends. In KellertS.WilsonE. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 275–300). Island Press.
88.
ShipmanP. (2010). The animal connection and human evolution. Current Anthropology, 51(4), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/653816
89.
SingerP. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals: Distributed by Random House.
90.
SingerT.LammC. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749
SmithE. A. (2017). Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. Routledge.
93.
SnodgrassJ.TiedjeK. (2008). Indigenous nature reverence and conservation: Seven ways of transcending an unnecessary dichotomy. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 2(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v2i1.6
StewardJ. (1959). The concept and method of cultural ecology. Readings in Anthropology, 2, 81–95.
96.
TannerA. (2000). Bringing home animals: Religious ideology and mode of production of the Mistassini Cree hunters (Sixth printing). ISER.
97.
TattersallI. (2013). Homo ergaster and its Contemporaries. In HenkeW.TattersallI. (Eds.), Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Springer.
98.
TaylorK.AlvarezL. R. (2019). An estimate of the number of animals used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 47(5–6), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261192919899853
99.
ThompsonB.QuinterC. (2020). The effects of kinship, reciprocity, and conscious deliberation on the level of concern for non-humans: How our psychology affects levels of concern for non-humans. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2020.000
100.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. (pp. 19–136). Oxford University Press.
UlrichR. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4
106.
Van PetegemP.BlieckA. (2006). The environmental worldview of children: A cross-cultural perspective. Environmental Education Research, 12(5), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601053662
107.
VarellaM. A. C. (2018). The biology and evolution of the three psychological tendencies to anthropomorphize biology and evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01839
108.
ViningJ. (2003). The connection to other animals and caring for nature. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 87–99.
109.
WhiteL. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.
