Response style, specifically the tendency to use response categories that are distant from the midpoint of a Likert-type scale, has been linked to culture and to the personal meaningfulness of the item. In this study, 58 Spanish-English bilinguals completed two gender role attitudes scales—the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS) and the Historic-Sociocultural Premises Scale (HSCP)—with items randomly assigned to be presented in English or Spanish. The HSCP was rated as more meaningful, and participants used more extreme categories in Spanish. Participants rated items on the AWS as more meaningful and used more extreme categories when items were presented in their first language; meaningfulness did not completely account for the latter effect. The results suggest that both language and meaningfulness affect response style. Response style is important not only as a confounding variable in crosscultural research but as an indicator of personal meaning and other culturally related phenomena such as language.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bachman, J. G.,& O’Malley, P. M. (1984). Yea-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes: Black-white differences in response styles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491-509.
2.
Bellezza, F. S., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1986). Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 299-303.
3.
Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and crosscultural comparisons of rating scales among east Asian and north American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170-175.
4.
Chia, R. C., Allred, L. J., & Jerzak, P. A. (1997). Attitudes toward women in Taiwan and China: Current status, problems, and suggestions for future research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 137-150.
5.
Chun, K. -T., Campbell, J. B., & Yoo, J. H. (1974). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: A reminder. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 465-480.
6.
Díaz-Guerrero, R. (1972). Una escala factorial de premisas históricosocioculturales de la familia Mexicana [A factorial scale of historicsociocultural premises of the Mexican family]. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 6, 235-244.
7.
Díaz-Guerrero, R. (1975). Psychology of the Mexican: Culture and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
8.
Gibbons, J. L., Hamby, B. A., & Dennis, W. D. (1997). Researching gender-role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 151-170.
9.
Greenleaf, E. A. (1992). Measuring extreme response style. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 328-351.
10.
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131-149.
11.
Hui, C. H.,& Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296-309.
12.
Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S. -C., Gelfand, M. J., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
13.
Marín, G., Gamba, R. J., & Marín, B. V. (1992). Extreme response style and acquiescence among Hispanics: The role of acculturation and education. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 498-509.
14.
Marín, G., Triandis, H. C., Betancourt, H., & Kashima, Y. (1983). Ethnic affirmation versus social desirability: Explaining discrepancies in bilinguals’ responses to a questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 173-186.
15.
Pérez-Prada, E. (1992). Gender roles in Spain and the USA. Unpublished master’s thesis, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.
16.
Ralston, D. A., Cunniff, M. K., & Gustafson, D. J. (1995). Cultural accommodation: The effect of language on the responses of bilingual Hong Kong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 714-727.
17.
Shapiro, A. H., Rosenblood, L., Berlyne, G. M., & Finberg, J. (1976). The relationship of test familiarity to extreme response styles in Bedouin and Moroccan boys. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7, 357-364.
18.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 667-668.
19.
Stening, B. W., & Everett, J. E. (1984). Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 151-156.
20.
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Triandis, H. C., & Marín, G. (1983). Etic plus emic versus pseudoetic: A test of a basic assumption of contemporary cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 489-500.
22.
van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1984). Answers without questions: A note on response style in questionnaires. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 827-831.
24.
Yates, J. F., Lee, J. -W., & Bush, J. G. (1997). General knowledge overconfidence: Cross-national variations, response style, and “reality.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 87-94.
25.
Zax, M., & Takahashi, S. (1967). Cultural influences on response styles: Comparison of Japanese and American college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 71, 3-10.
