Anatomic reduction of ankle fractures may influence outcomes but the relationships between these 2 variables are still unknown and require further investigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between radiologic alignment of surgically treated ankle fractures and functional outcomes.
Methods:
This retrospective study included patients who were surgically treated for Weber B and C ankle fractures. The outcome measures consisted of the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and the foot and ankle disability measure. Standard radiographs included anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views of the ankle, both on pre- and postoperatively. Between June 2011 and December 2013, a total of 152 patients were treated for ankle fractures and 76 patients with a mean age of 41.3 ± 17.1 years and a mean follow-up of 39.6 ± 8.9 months were included. There were 45 Weber type B fractures (mean age 43.4 ± 17.8, 28 females, 17 males) and 31 Weber type C fractures (mean age 40.7 ± 17.3, 12 females, 19 males).
Results:
Linear regression did not reveal any significant relationships with the exception of age. There was a moderate correlation between the OMAS outcome score and age (r2 = 0.46, P = .01).
Conclusion:
We found that younger age was a moderate predictor of functional outcome following surgical treatment of ankle fractures. Radiographic alignment using standard non-weight-bearing radiographs and fracture severity did not predict functional outcomes at 24 months postoperatively.
Level of Evidence:
Level III, prognostic, retrospective cohort study.
BauerMBergstromBHemborgASandegardJ.Malleolar fractures: nonoperative versus operative treatment. A controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:17-27.
2.
BeauchampCGClayNRThextonPW.Displaced ankle fractures in patients over 50 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(3):329-332.
3.
DavidovitchRWalshMSpitzerAEgolKA.Functional outcome after operatively treated ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(8):728-733.
4.
DonkenCCVerhofstadMHEdwardsMJvan LaarhovenCJ.Twenty-one year follow-up of supination-external rotation type II-IV (OTA Type B) ankle fractures: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:e108-e114.
5.
EgolKATejwaniNCWalshMGCaplaELKovalKJ.Predictors of short-term functional outcome following ankle fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88A(5):974-979.
6.
EgolKAPahkBWalshMTejwaniNCDavidovitchRIKovalKJ.Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):7-11.
7.
HoshinoCMNomotoEKNorheimEPHarrisTG.Correlation of weightbearing radiographs and stability of stress positive ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(2):92-98.
8.
JiangKNSchulzBMTsuiYLGardnerTRGreisbergJK.Comparison of radiographic stress tests for syndesmotic instability of supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(6):e123-e127.
9.
LambersKOotesDRingD.Incidence of patients with lower extremity injuries presenting to US emergency departments by anatomic region, disease category, and age. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:284-290.
10.
LinCWDonkersNARefshaugeKMBeckenkampPRKheraKMosleyAM.Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD005595.
11.
LitrentaJSaperDTornettaPIII. Does syndesmotic injury have a negative effect on functional outcome? A multicentre prospective evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:410-413.
12.
MakwanaNKBhowalBHarperWMHuiWM.Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83-B(4):525-529.
13.
MalekIAMachaniBMevchaAMHyderNH.Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the Weber classification of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1204-1206.
14.
MartinRLIrrgangJJBurdettRGContiSF.Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Disability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(11):968-983.
15.
McPhailSMDunstanJCanningJHainesTP.Life impact of ankle fractures: qualitative analysis of patient and clinician experiences. BMC Musculosk Disord. 2012;13:244.
16.
MichelsenJDAhnUMHelgemoSL.Motion of the ankle in a simulated supination-external rotation fracture model. J Bone Joint Am. 1996;78(7):1024-1031.
17.
MullerMEAllgowerMSchneiderRWilleneggerH.Manual of Internal Fixation. Technique Recommended by the AO Group. 2nd ed.New York: Springer; 1979.
18.
NilssonGNybergPEkdahlCEnerothM.Performance after surgical treatment of patients with ankle fracture—14-month follow-up. Physiother Res Int. 2003;8(2):69-82.
19.
NillsonGEnerothMEkdahlC.The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures. BMC Musculosk Disord. 2013;14:109.
20.
OlerudCMolanderH.A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Traum Surg. 1984;103(3):190-194.
21.
PakarinenHJFlinkkilaTEOhtonenPP. Syndesmotic fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(12):1103-1109.
22.
PannucciCWilkinsEG.Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619-625.
23.
ParadisC.Bias in surgical research. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):180-188.
24.
PorterDAMayBDBerneyT.Functional outcome after operative treatment for ankle fractures in young athletes: a retrospective case series. Foot Ankle Int2008;29(9):887-894.
25.
RichterJSchulzeWClasbrummelBMuhrG.The role of the tibiofibular syndesmotic and the deltoid ligaments in stabilizing Weber B type ankle joint fractures—an experimental investigation [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106(5):359-366.
26.
RungpraiCGoetzJEArunakulM. Validation and reproducibility of a biplane imaging system versus conventional radiography of foot and ankle radiographic parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(11):1166-1175.
27.
SandersDWTieszerCCorbettB.Operative versus nonoperative treatment of unstable lateral malleolar fractures: a randomized multicenter trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:129-134.
28.
SegalGElbazAParsiA. Clinical outcomes following ankle fracture: a cross-sectional observational study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7(1):50.
29.
ShahASKadakiaARTanGJKaradshehMSWolterTDSabbB.Radiographic evaluation of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(10):870-876.
30.
StewartCSaleemOMukherjeeDPSukMMarymontJAnissianL.Axial load weightbearing radiography in determining lateral malleolus fracture stability: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(7):548-552.
31.
TejwaniNCMcLaurinTMWalshMBhadsavleSKovalKJEgolKA.Are bimalleolar fractures poorer than those of lateral malleolar fractures with medial ligamentous injury?J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(7):1438-1441.
32.
ThakoreRVHooeBSConsidineP. Ankle fractures and employment: a life-changing event for patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(5):417-422.
33.
Van Schie-Van der WeertEMVan LieshutEMMDe VriesMRVan der ElstMSchepersT.Determinants of outcome in operatively and non-operatively treated Weber-B ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Traum Surg. 2012;132(2):257-263.
34.
WeberMBurmeisterHFlueckigerGKrauseFG.The use of weightbearing radiographs to assess the stability of supination-external rotation fractures of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(5):693-698.
35.
WeeningBBhandariM.Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma2005; 19 (2):102-108
36.
YablonIGHellerFGShouseL.The key role of the lateral malleolus in displaced fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(2):169-173.
37.
YangYhouJLiBhaoHYuTYuT.Operative exploration and reduction of syndesmosis in Weber type C ankle injury. Acta Orthop Bras. 2013;21(2):103-108.
38.
YinMCYuanXFMaJM. Evaluating the reliability and reproducibility of the AO and Lauge-Hansen classification systems for ankle injuries. Orthopedics. 2015;38(7):e265-e230.
