Age Differences in Simple and Procedural Reaction Time Among Healthy Military Personnel

Abstract

Knowledge of cognitive processing changes among adults is important as it can impact their work and home functioning. However, basic cognitive changes due to aging among healthy working adults are either not as well documented or focus on adults over 60 years of age. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of younger (age 21-38) and older (age 39-58) military personnel on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric (ANAM) tests of simple and procedural reaction time. Descriptive statistics including correlation analyses were used to examine the data. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare the groups. Linear regression was used to predict age based on the three reaction time tests. Results of the correlation analyses failed to find a significant relationship between age and reaction time (p > .05). Results of the t-tests failed to find significant mean differences between younger and older participants (p > .05). Results of the linear regression analyses failed to find significance for predicting age based on the selected reaction time measures (p > .05). These results appear to support findings that age-related differences in reaction time do not occur during less complex reaction time tasks.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alfred

Rice

(in press). Age and Cognitive Performance. Proceedings of the 2012 Applied Human Factors & Ergonomics Conference, San Francisco, CA.

Anstey

K.J.

Low

(2004). Normal cognitive changes in aging. Australian Family Physician, 33 (10), 783-787.

Army Policy Message 06-06 (2006). Change to Maximum Age Criteria. 5 April 2006. Retrieved 30 January 2012 from: http://www.armyreenlistment.com/Messages/Policy/PM_06_06_age.pdf

Automated Neuropscyhological Assessment Metrics (Version 4) [Computer Software] (2007). Norman, OK: Center for the Study of Human Operator Performance (C-SHOP), University of Oklahoma.

Center for the Study of Human Operator Performance (2007). Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) Version 4 User Manual. Norman, OK: C-SHOP. Retrieved June 13, 2012 from: http://www.c-shop.ou.edu/literature/manual.pdf

Bleiberg

Kane

R. L.

Reeves

D. L.

Garmoe

W. S.

Halpern

E. L.

(2000). Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14(3), 287-294.

Boesveldt

J. Frasnelli

Gordon

A. R.

Lundström

J. N.

(2010). The fish is bad: Negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors. Biological Psychology 84(2), 313-317.

Botwinick

(1966). Cautiousness in advanced age. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 347-353.

Christensen

(2001). What cognitive changes can be expected with normal aging? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 768–775.

10.

C-SHOP (2007). ANAM4 TBI-MIL: User Manual. Center for the Study of Human Operator Performance, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.

11.

Der

Deary

I. J.

(2006). Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom health and lifestyle survey. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 62-73.

12.

Gorus

De Raedt

Lambert

Lemper

Mets

(2008). Reaction times and performance variability in normal aging, cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 21(3), 204-219.

13.

Hultsch

D.F.

MacDonald

S.W.

Dixon

R.A.

(2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57, 101–115.

14.

Jenkins

Myerson

Joerding

J.A.

Hale

(2000). Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition. Psychology and Aging, 15(1), 157-175.

15.

Kosinski

R.J.

(2010). A literature review on reaction time. Clemson University. Retrieved February 23, 2012 from: http://biology.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm

16.

Luchies

C. W.

Schiffman

Richards

L. G.

Thompson

M. R.

Bazuin

DeYoung

A. J.

(2002). Effects of age, step direction, and reaction condition on the ability to step quickly. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A, 57(4), M246.

17.

National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008, HR 4986, Section 1673. 28 Jan 2008. Improvement of medical tracking system for members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas. Retrieved 30 January 2012 from: www.dod.gov/dodgc/olc/docs/pl110-181.pdf.

18.

Nettelbeck

Rabbitt

P.M.A.

(1992). Aging, cognitive performance, and mental speed. Intelligence, 16(2), 189-205.

19.

Redfern

M. S.

Muller

Jennings

J. R.

Furman

J. M.

(2002). Attentional dynamics in postural control during perturbations in young and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A, 57(8), B298.

20.

Thorne

D.R.

(2006). Throughput: a simple performance index with desirable characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 569-573.

21.

Welford

A. T.

(1980). Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In Welford

A. T.

(Ed.), Reaction Times. Academic Press, New York, pp. 73-128.