Regression analysis of driver ratings of alerts issued by an in-vehicle active safety system during a field operational test identified contextual factors that influence driver acceptance of system alerts. A nominal characterization of pedestrian location and two quantitative measures of pedestrian motion predict more than 60% of the variability in driver ratings and do not interact. This finding is empirical support for the classic notion of the field of safe travel (Gibson & Crooks, 1938).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FarberE.PaleyM. (1993). Using freeway traffic data to estimate the effectiveness of rear-end collision countermeasures. Proceedings of the 1993 Annual Meeting of IVHS America. Washington, D.C.
2.
GibsonJ. J.CrooksL. E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. The American Journal of Psychology, 51, 453-471.
3.
HimanenV.KumalaR. (1988). An application of logit models in analysing the behaviour of pedestrians and car drivers on pedestrian crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 20, 187–197.
4.
JacksonL.ChapmanP.CrundallD. (2009). What happens next? Predicting other road users’ behaviour as a function of driving experience and processing time. Ergonomics, 52, 154 - 164.
5.
KällhammerJ.-E.SmithK. (2012). Assessing contextual factors that influence acceptance of pedestrian alerts by a night vision system. Human Factors. Pre-published 13March2012, DOI:10.1177/ 0018720812437411.
6.
MarshallD. C.LeeJ. D.AustriaP. A. (2007). Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human Factors49, 145–157.
7.
SchmidtB.FärberS. (2009). Pedestrians at the kerb – Recognising the action intentions of humans. Transportation Research Part F, 12, 300–310.
8.
Swedish Research Council. (2002). Ethical principles for research using human participants. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
9.
van der LaanL. D.HeinoA.De WaardP. (1997). A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C, 5, 1-10.