Police in-vehicle technologies especially mobile computer terminals (MCTs) are the major cause of motor vehicle crashes for law enforcement officers. Previous studies have found several usability issues with the design of MCT interfaces. The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for classification of MCT interface usability based on a combination of officer performance, visual attention allocation, and subjective measures. It was found that speed deviation, secondary task completion time, off-road fixation frequency and glance duration are informative features that associate with MCT usability. The developed algorithm has the potential to be used in MCT design and development process to ensure efficient interaction in multi-tasking situations of driving and using the MCT.
References
1.
BeckersN.SchreinerS.BertrandP.MehlerB.ReimerB. (2017). Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 25-34.
2.
BLS (2016). Table A-6. Fatal occupational injuries resulting from transportation incidents and homicides by occupation, all United States, 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cftb0300.xlsx
3.
BrookeJ. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.
4.
CallanderM.ZormanL. (2007, April). Usability on patrol. In CHI'07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1709-1714). ACM.
5.
CitrowskeJ.GummertJ.HanegraafL.KidwellE.MencelK.MurphyD.… TschidaA. (2011). Distracted Driving by Law Enforcement Officers Resulting in Auto Liability Claims: Identification of the Issues and Recommendations for Implementation of a Loss Control Program. PSA689 Public Administration Capstone. St. Mary’s University of Minnesota, Winona, Minnesota.
6.
DumasJ. S. (2002, January). User-based evaluations. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1093-1117). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
7.
EckerR.BroyV.ButzA.De LucaA. (2009, September). pieTouch: a direct touch gesture interface for interacting with in-vehicle information systems. In Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on Human-Computer interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (p. 22). ACM.
8.
FengF.LiuY.ChenY. (2017). Effects of Quantity and Size of Buttons of In-Vehicle Touch Screen on Drivers’ Eye Glance Behavior. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(12), 1105-1118.
9.
FiltnessA. J.Mitsopoulos-RubensE.LennéM. G. (2013). The impact of interface modality on police officers' visual behaviour when using an in-vehicle system. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg, Sweden.
HamptonP.LanghamM. (2005). A contextual study of police car telematics: the future of in-car information systems. Ergonomics, 48(2), 109-118.
12.
HarveyC.StantonN. A.PickeringC. A.McdonaldM.ZhengP. (2011). To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems. Ergonomics, 54(7), 609-625.
KimH.KwonS.HeoJ.LeeH.ChungM. K. (2014). The effect of touch-key size on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety during simulated driving. Applied ergonomics, 45(3), 379-388.
KunA. L.MillerW. T.LenharthW. H. (2004). Computers in police cruisers. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(4), 34-41.
17.
LantzB. (2013). Machine learning with R. Packt Publishing Ltd.
18.
MarcusA.GasperiniJ. (2006). Almost dead on arrival: A case study of non-user-centered design for a police emergency-response system. Interactions, 13(5), 12-18.
19.
MeyerD.DimitriadouE.HornikK.WeingesselA.LeischF.ChangC.LinC. (2019). e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071/index.html
20.
MillerW. T.KunA. L. (2013, October). Using speech, GUIs and buttons in police vehicles: field data on user preferences for the Project54 system. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 108-113). ACM.
21.
Mitsopoulos-RubensE.TrotterM. J.LennéM. G. (2011). Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: A comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 583-591.
22.
Mitsopoulos-RubensEveFiltnessAshleigh J.LennéMichael G. (2013, August) Assessment of police subjective workload and preference for using a voice-based interface during simulated driving. Presented atthe Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
23.
National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (2018a). Causes of Law Enforcement Deaths Over the Past Decade (2008-2017) (Washington, DC: National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund). Retrieved February2, 2019 from https://nleomf.org/facts-figures/causes-of-law-enforcement-deaths
PankokC.KaberD. (2018). The effect of navigation display clutter on performance and attention allocation in presentation-and simulator-based driving experiments. Applied Ergonomics, 69, 136-145.
27.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
YagerC.DinakarS.SanagaramM.FerrisT. K. (2015). Emergency vehicle operator on-board device distractions (Technical Report). College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
30.
ZahabiM.KaberD. (2018a). Identification of task demands and usability issues in police use of mobile computing terminals. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 161–171.
31.
ZahabiM.KaberD. (2018b). Effect of police mobile computer terminal interface design on officer driving distraction. Applied Ergonomics, 67, 26-38.
