We describe a case study of a civil suit involving an elevator incident causing serious injury to a 5-year-old male. We illustrate how scientific principles and measurements of conspicuity, cognitive development and parental supervision inform a human factors analysis of the contributing issues of an unusual incident sequence.
References
1.
BjorklundD. F. (1989) Children’s thinking: developmental function and individual differences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
2.
FilipponeJ.FeldmanJ.D.SchlossR.D.CooperD.A.StablerJ.L. (2012) Elevator and escalator accident reconstruction and litigation, 3rd edition. Tuscon: Lawyers and Judges Publishing.
3.
GinsburgH.OpperS. (1979). Piaget’s Theory of Intellectual Development: 2d Ed. Prentice-Hall.
4.
GoldschmidM.L. (1967) Different Types of Conservation and Nonconservation and Their Relation to Age, Sex, IQ, MA, and Vocabulary. Child Development, 38(4), pp. 1229-1246.
5.
LanghamM.P.MoberlyN.J. (2003). Pedestrian conspicuity research: A review. Ergonomics, 46, 345-363.
6.
PoratheT.StrandL. (2011) Which sign is more visible? Measuring the visibility of signs through the conspicuity index method. European Transportation Research Review, 3, pp 35-45.
7.
SalujaG.BrennerR.MorrongielloB. A.HaynieD.RiveraM.ChengT. L. (2004). The role of supervision in child injury risk: definition, conceptual and measurement issues. Injury control and safety promotion, 11(1), 17-22.
8.
MorrongielloB. A.OndejkoL.LittlejohnA. (2004). Understanding toddlers’ in-home injuries: II. Examining parental strategies, and their efficacy, for managing child injury risk. Journal of pediatric psychology, 29(6), 433-446.
9.
ToetA.KooiF.L.BijlP.ValetonJ.M. (1998) Visual conspicuity determines human target acquisition performance. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 37(7), pp. 1969-75.
10.
WertheimA.H. (2010) Visual conspicuity: A new simple standard, its reliability, validity and applicability. Ergonomics, 53(3), pp. 421–442.
