User-Centered Approaches for Designing Robots: Methods and Measures for Engaging End Users

Abstract

Robots are increasingly integrated into everyday life as companions and assistants, raising an important question in human-robot interaction research: Are these robots truly designed to meet our needs? Understanding users’ needs regarding their health, work, interactions, wellness, and quality of life is vital to designing robots that support them reliably. This design thinking approach puts the users first, with adequate consideration for their perceptions, interests, preferences, concerns, and needs. The critical question is not whether robots can provide support but how best to design them to make them more usable and useful for a range of end-users, including persons with disabilities, professional healthcare providers, older adults, young adults, children, and family care partners. The goal of this panel would be to discuss approaches, design techniques, and lessons learned while implementing user-centered design approaches that prioritize the users in the design of assistive robots. The panelists are experts who have a wealth of experience in human-factors design and healthcare, health technology innovation, human-robot interaction, usability evaluation, and human-machine teaming. Their discussion will enhance our understanding of user-centered approaches to design and focus on design to meet the users’ needs, preferences, capabilities, and limitations.

Keywords

human-robot interaction user-centered design participatory design methods and measures human factors design health technology innovation usability evaluation human-machine teaming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avioz-Sarig

Olatunji

Sarne-Fleischmann

Edan

(2021). Robotic system for physical training of older adults. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(5), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00697-y

Babalola

G. T.

Gaston

J.-M.

Trombetta

Tulk Jesso

(2024). A systematic review of collaborative robots for nurses: Where are we now, and where is the evidence? Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1398140

Beer

J. M.

Prakash

Smarr

C.-A.

Chen

T. L.

Hawkins

Nguyen

Deyle

Mitzner

T. L.

Kemp

C. C.

Rogers

W. A.

(2017). Older users’ acceptance of an assistive robot: Attitudinal changes following brief exposure. Gerontechnology: International Journal on the Fundamental Aspects of Technology to Serve the Ageing Society, 16(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2017.16.1.003.00

Law

Sutherland

Ahn

H. S.

MacDonald

B. A.

Peri

Johanson

D. L.

Vajsakovic

D.-S.

Kerse

Broadbent

(2019). Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: A qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care. BMJ Open, 9, e031937. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031937

Lyons

J. B.

Hamdan

I. aldin

T. Q.

(2023). Explanations and trust: What happens to trust when a robot partner does something unexpected? Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107473

Olatunji

S. A.

Oron-Gilad

Markfeld

Gutman

Sarne-Fleischmann

Edan

(2021). Levels of automation and transparency: Interaction design considerations in assistive robots for older adults. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(6), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3107516

Olatunji

S. A.

Shim

J. S.

Syed

Tsai

Y.-L.

Pereira

A. E.

Mahajan

H. P.

Mudar

R. A.

Rogers

W. A.

(2025). Robotic support for older adults with cognitive and mobility impairments. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 12, 1545733. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2025.1545733

Ostrowski

A. K.

Breazeal

Park

H. W.

(2022). Mixed-method long-term robot usage: Older adults’ lived experience of social robots. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 33–42). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889488

Smarr

C. A.

Fausset

C. B.

Rogers

W. A

. (2011). Understanding the potential for robot assistance for older adults in the home environment. Georgia Institute of Technology.

10.

Wada

Shibata

(2007). Social effects of robot therapy in a care house—Change of social network of the residents for two months. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 1250–1255). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363156