Measuring Adaptive Behavior in Inpatient Neuropsychiatry: The Behavioural Assessment Scale

Abstract

The Behavioural Assessment Scale (BAS) was administered to a sample of 95 inpatients with neuropsychiatric conditions. The total scores in the sample ranged from 26 to 145 (maximum possible score is 163), without any evidence of the "floor effect" encountered with other tests used with this population. Investigation into the psychometric structure of the BAS revealed three factors interpreted as Daily Living Skills, Communication/Social Skills, and Problem Behavior. The high intercorrelation between the two dominant factors was interpreted as general sensitivity of the BAS to global decline in functioning associated with severity of illness. These results confirm a previous psychometric investigation carried out on an elderly psychiatric sample. A recommendation is made for interpreting subscales based on these factor domains when specific abilities are of interest and using a Global Functioning subscale as a measure of overall adaptive behavior for both adult and geriatric inpatient neuropsychiatry patients.

Keywords

Behavioural Assessment Scale factor analysis reliability validity Nursing Rating Scale

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Clark, C. M. , & Ewbank, D. C. (1996). Performance of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale: A caregiver questionnaire for rating severity in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 10, 31-39.

Cliff, N. (1987). Analyzing multivariate data. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harcourt BraceJovanovich.

Folstein, M. , Folstein, S. , & McHugh, P. (1975). Mini-Mental State.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: ErIbaum.

Guadagnoli, E. , & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.

Hersch, E. L. , Kral, V. A. , & Palmer, R. B. (1978). Clinical value of the London Psychogeriatric Rating Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 26, 348-354.

Iverson, G. L. , & Haley, G. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Behavioural Assessment Scale. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 138-138.

Ritchie, K. , & Ledesert, B. (1991). The measurement of incapacity in the severely demented elderly: The validation of a behavioural assessment scale. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 6, 217-226.

Saxton, J. , McGonigle-Gibson, K. L. , Swihart, A. A. , Miller, V. J. , & Boller, F. (1990). Assessment of the severely impaired patient: Description and validation of a new neuropsychological test battery. Psychological Assessment, 2, 298-303.

10.

Schmitt, F. A. , Ashford, W. , Ernesto, C. , Saxton, J. , Schneider, L. S. , Clark, C. M. , Ferris, S. H. , Mackell, J. A. , Schafer, K. , Thal, L. J. , & The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study . (1997). The Severe Impairment Battery: Concurrent validity and the assessment of longitudinal change in Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11, S51-S56.

11.

Spiegel, R. , Brunner, C. , Ermini-Funfschilling, D. , Monsch, A. , Notter, M. , Puxty, J. , & Tremmel, L. (1991). A new behavioral assessment scale for geriatric outand inpatients: The NOSGER (Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39, 339-347.

12.

Woodward T. S. , & Iverson, G. L. (1999). The Behavioural Assessment Scale: Internal consistency and factor structure for an elderly psychiatric population. Applied Neuropsychology, 6, 170-177.

13.

World Health Organization (WHO) . (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.