An experimental scale for the assessment of prison violence risk among maximum security inmates was developed from a logistic regression analysis involving inmates serving parole-eligible terms of varying length (n = 1,503), life-without-parole inmates (n = 960), and death-sentenced inmates who were mainstreamed into the general prison population (n = 132). Records of institutional violent misconduct of these 2,595 inmates were retrospectively examined for an 11-year period (1991 to 2002). Predictors affecting the likelihood of such misconduct included age, type and length of sentence, education, prior prison terms, prior probated sentences, and years served. The scale was modestly successful, as demonstrated by an overall omnibus area under the curve of .719. Double cross-validation demonstrated minimal shrinkage. The authors have termed this experimental scale the Risk Assessment Scale for Prison.
Alexander, J., & Austin, J. (1992). Handbook for evaluating objective prison classification systems. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
2.
Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Strand, S. (2000). Prediction of violence using the HCR-20: A prospective study in two maximum security correctional institutions. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 167-175.
4.
Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Edens, J. F., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, J. K. (2002). Psychopathy as a predictor of institutional misbehavior among sex offenders: A prospective replication. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 497-511.
5.
Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., & Ryan, J. (2001). Evaluating risk for violence: A preliminary study of the HCR-20, PCL-R and VRAG in a Scottish prison sample (Report prepared for the Scottish Prison Service). Edinburgh: Scottish Prison Service Occassional Service.
6.
Cunningham, M. D., & Goldstein, A. M. (2003). Sentencing determinations in death penalty cases. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 407-436). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Cunningham, M. D., & Reidy, T. J. (1998a). Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy: Diagnostic dilemmas in classifying patterns of antisocial behavior in sentencing evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 16, 333-351.
8.
Cunningham, M. D., & Reidy, T. J. (1998b). Integrating base rate data in violence risk assessments at capital sentencing. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 16, 71-95.
9.
Cunningham, M. D., & Reidy, T. J. (1999). Don’t confuse me with the facts: Common errors in violence risk assessment at capital sentencing. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 20-43.
10.
Cunningham, M. D., & Reidy, T. J. (2002). Violence risk assessment at federal capital sentencing: Individualization, generalization, relevance, and scientific standards. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 512-537.
11.
Cunningham, M. D., Reidy, T. J., & Sorensen, J. R. (in press). Is death row obsolete? A decade of mainstreaming death-sentenced inmates in Missouri. Behavioral Sciences & the Law.
12.
Douglas, K. S., & Webster, C. D. (1999). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 3-19.
13.
Edens, J. F. (2001). Misuses of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: Two case examples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1082-1093.
14.
Edens, J. F., Petrila, J., & Buffington-Vollum, J. K. (2001). Psychopathy and the death penalty: Can the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised identify offenders who represent “a continuing threat to society?”Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 433-481.
15.
Edens, J. F., Poythress, N., & Lilienfield, S. (1999). Identifying inmates at risk for disciplinary infractions: A comparison of two measures of psychopathy. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 435-443.
16.
Edens, J. F., Poythress, N., & Watkins, M. M. (2001). Further validation of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory among offenders: Personality and behavioral correlates. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 403-415.
17.
Flanagan, T. J. (1980). Time served and institutional misconduct: Patterns of involvement in disciplinary infractions among long-term and short-term inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 357-367.
18.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Law, M. A. (1997). Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 414-432.
19.
Hare, R. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
20.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1989). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.
21.
Kennedy, T. D. (1986). Trends in inmate classification: A status report of two computerized psychometric approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 165-184.
22.
Kosson, D. S., Steuerwald, B. L., Forth, A. E., & Kirkhart, K. J. (1997). A new method for assessing the interpersonal behavior of psychopathic individuals: Preliminary validation studies. Psychological Assessment, 9, 89-101.
23.
Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
24.
Lombardi, G., Sluder, R. D., & Wallace, D. (1997). Main streaming death-sentenced inmates: The Missouri experience and its legal significance. Federal Probation, 61, 3-11.
25.
Marquart, J. W., Ekland-Olson, S., & Sorensen, J. R. (1989). Gazing into the crystal ball: Can jurors accurately predict dangerousness in capital cases?Law & Society Review, 23, 449-168.
26.
Megargee, E. I. (1984). Derivation, validation, and application of an MMPI-based system for classifying criminal offenders. Medicine and Law, 3, 109-118.
27.
Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Monahan, J. (1996). Violence prediction: The past twenty years. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 107-120.
29.
Morey, L. C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
30.
National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. (1992). Jail classification system development: A review of the literature, revised edition. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
Osborne, J. W. (2000). Prediction in multiple regression. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(2). Retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=2
32.
Quay, H. (1984). Managing adult inmates: Classification for housing and program assignments. Adult Internal Management System (AIMS) classification manual. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
33.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
Reidy, T. J., Cunningham, M. D., & Sorensen, J. R. (2001). From death to life: Prison behavior of former death row inmates in Indiana. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 62-82.
35.
Saldano v. Texas, 530 U. S. 1212 (2000).
36.
Shah, S. (1978). Dangerousness: A paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 224-238.
37.
Sorensen, J. R., & Pilgrim, R. L. (2000). An actuarial risk assessment of violence posed by capital murder defendants. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90, 1251-1270.
38.
Sorensen, J. R., & Wrinkle, R. D. (1996). No hope for parole: Disciplinary infractions among death-sentenced and life-without-parole inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 542-552.
39.
Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83-100.
40.
Van Voorhis, P. (1994). Psychological classification of the adult male prison inmate. New York: State University of New York Press.
41.
Walters, G. D., Duncan, S. A., & Geyer, M. D. (2003). Predicting disciplinary adjustment in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation: A direct comparison of the PCL-R and the PAI. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 14, 382-393.
42.
Webster, C. D., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. (1997). The HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
43.
Widiger, T. A., & Corbitt, E. (1995). Antisocial personality disorder. In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), The DSM IV personality disorders (pp. 103-134). New York: Guilford.
