This study compares two instruments frequently used to assess risk for violence, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV), in a large sample of civil psychiatric patients. Despite a strong bivariate relationship with community violence, the VRAG could not improve on the predictive validity of the PCL:SV alone, even though the VRAG includes several ostensible violence risk factors other than psychopathy. Moreover, incremental validity analyses indicated that the remaining VRAG items accounted for little or no variance in violent outcomes once psychopathy scores were controlled. Conversely, the PCL:SV continued to account for considerable variance after controlling for the VRAG. These results reflect the limited validity of the VRAG items in civil psychiatric samples beyond the variance that is explained by the PCL:SV alone.
Banks, S., Robbins, P., Silver, E., Vesselinov, R., Steadman, H., Monahan, J., et al. (2004). A multiple-models approach to violence risk assessment among people with mental disorder. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 31, 324-340.
2.
Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Edens, J. F., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, J. (2002). Psychopathy as a predictor of institutional misbehavior among sex offenders: A prospective replication. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 497-511.
3.
Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1999). Evaluating the screening version of the Hare PCL-R: An item response theory analysis. Psychological Assessment, 11, 3-13.
4.
Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., & Ryan, J. (2001). Evaluating risk for violence: A preliminary study of the HCR-20, PCL-R and VRAG in a Scottish Prison Sample. Report prepared for the Scottish Prison Service.
5.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFImanualsupplement. Odessa, FL: PAR, Inc.
6.
Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 917-930.
7.
Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383..
8.
Douglas, K. S., Vincent, G. M., & Edens, J. F. (2006). Risk for criminal recidivism: The role of psychopathy. In C. Patrick (Ed.), Handbookof psychopathy. New York: Guilford.
9.
Edens, J. F., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Keilen, A., Roskamp, P., & Anthony, C. (2005). Predictions of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: Is it time to “disinvent the wheel?”Law and Human Behavior, 29, 55-86.
10.
Edens, J. F., & Campbell, J. (in press). Identifying youths at risk for institutional misconduct: A meta-analytic investigation of the Psychopathy Checklist measures. Psychological Services.
11.
Edens, J. F., Campbell, J., & Weir, J. (in press). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior.
12.
Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (in press). On the validity of validity scales: The importance of defensive responding in the prediction of institutional misconduct. Psychological Assessment.
13.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “un-paralleled” measure of offender risk?Criminal Justice & Behavior, 29, 397-426.
14.
Glover, A. J. J., Nicholson, D. E., Hemmati, T., Bernfeld, G. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). A comparison of predictors of general and violent recidivism among high risk federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 235-249.
15.
Guy, L. G., Edens, J. F., Anthony, C., & Douglas, K. S. (2005). Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1056-1064.
16.
Hare, R. D. (1991). The psychopathy checklist-revised manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
17.
Hare, R. D. (2003). The psychopathy checklist-revised manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
18.
Harris, G., Rice, M., & Camilleri, J. (2004). Applying a forensic actuarial assessment to nonforensic patients. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1063-1074.
19.
Harris, G., Rice, M., & Quinsey, V. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disorderedoffenders: The developmentof a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
20.
Harris, G., Rice, M., Quinsey, V., Lalumiere, M., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
21.
Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Screening Version (PCL:SV). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
22.
Hunsley, J. (2003). Introduction to the special section on incremental validity and utility in clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15, 443-445.
23.
Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instrumentsin predictinginstitutionalmisconductandnew convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
24.
Loranger, A., Lezenweger, M., Gartner, M., Susman, A., Herzig, J., & Zammit, G. (1991). Trait-state artifacts and the diagnosis of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 720-728.
25.
Lyon, D. R., Hart, S. D., & Webster, C. D. (2001). Violence and risk assessment. In J. R. P. Ogloff & R. A. Schuller (Eds.), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives (pp. 314-350). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
26.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Robbins, P. C., Appelbaum, P. S., Banks, S., Grisso, T., et al. (2005). An actuarial modelof violencerisk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56, 810-815.
27.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthurstudyof mentaldisorder andviolence. New York: Oxford Press.
28.
Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: PAR, Inc.
29.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E.,& Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: APA.
30.
Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178-200.
31.
Skeem, J. L., Miller, J., Mulvey, E., Tiemann, J., & Monahan, J. (2005). Using a five-factor lens to explore the relation between personality traits and violence in psychiatric patients. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 73, 454-463.
32.
Skeem, J. L., & Mulvey, E. (2001). Psychopathy and communityviolence among civil psychiatric patients: Results from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 358-374.
33.
Walters, G. (2003). Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the Psychopathy Checklist factor scores: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 541-558.
34.
Walters, G. D. (in press). Risk-appraisal versus self-report in the prediction of criminal justice outcomes: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice & Behavior.
35.
Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2). Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University, MHLP Institute.
