Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) as a Measure of Treatment Effectiveness With Psychiatric Inpatients
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2006
Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) as a Measure of Treatment Effectiveness With Psychiatric Inpatients
Assessment procedures to evaluate inpatient treatment effectiveness can provide information to inform clinical practice. The Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) represents a standardized approach to assess patients’ target problems that combines elements of individualized and nomothetic approaches. Although previous evaluations of CASPER with other patient populations have been encouraging, its use as a measure of change with an inpatient population has not been examined. In this study, 75 psychiatric inpatients completed CASPER and the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32) at hospital admission and discharge. Results supported the concurrent validity of CASPER as a measure of pre- and posttreatment functioning and suggested that CASPER may provide a sensitive measure of change during inpatient treatment. Findings also supported the notion that patients’ ratings of the extent to which their treatment focused on the problems they identified as a high priority were related to their overall treatment satisfaction.
American Psychiatric Association. (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4thed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Battle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A. R., Nash, E. R., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184-192.
3.
Bloom, B. L. (1992). Computer-assisted psychological intervention: A review and commentary. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 169-197.
4.
Carr, A. C., Ghosh, A., & Ancill, R. J. (1983). Can a computer take a psychiatric history?Psychological Medicine, 13, 151-158.
5.
Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology: Challenges to the current system and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 121-153.
6.
Deane, F., Spicer, J., & Todd, D. (1997). Validity of a simplified target complaints measure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 119-130.
7.
Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90 administration, scoring, and procedures manual-1. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.
8.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595-605.
9.
Dignon, A. M. (1996). The development of a language for automating medical interviews. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 515-526.
10.
Doerfler, L. A., Addis, M. E., & Moran, P. W. (2002). Evaluating mental health outcomes in an inpatient setting: Convergent and divergent validity of the OQ-45 and BASIS-32. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 29, 394-403.
11.
Eisen, S. V. (1995). Assessment of subjective distress by patient self-report versus structured interview. Psychological Reports, 76, 35-39.
12.
Eisen, S. V., & Culhane, M. A. (1999). Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32).In M. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (2nd ed., pp. 759-790). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Eisen, S. V., Dill, D. L., & Grob, M. C. (1994). Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 242-247.
14.
Eisen, S. V., Grob, M. C., & Klein, A. A. (1986). BASIS: The development of a self-report measure for psychiatric inpatient. The Psychiatric Hospital, 17, 165-171.
15.
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.
16.
Erdman, H. P., Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., Jefferson, J. W., Salinger, R., & Olson, W. (1981). Clinical usefulness of a computer program for psychiatric diagnosis. In B. Shriver, R. Walker, & R. Grams (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.802-817). North Hollywood, CA: Western Periodicals.
17.
Erdman, H. P., Klein, M. H., & Greist, J. H. (1985). Direct patient computer interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 760-773.
18.
Farrell, A. D. (1999). Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) as a measure of treatment effectiveness in an outpatient training clinic. Psychological Assessment, 11, 345-358.
19.
Farrell, A. D., Camplair, P. S., & McCullough, L. (1987). Identification of target complaints by computer interview: Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 55, 691-700.
20.
Farrell, A. D., Li, X., Auerbach, S. M., & May, J. C. (1998, November). Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) for identifying target problems of women in a residential drug treatment program. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, DC.
21.
Farrell, A. D., & McCullough, L. (1989). User’s manual for the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER). Unpublished manual.
22.
Farrell, A. D., & McCullough-Vaillant, L. (1996). Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER): Development and current status. In M. Miller, K. Hammond,& M. Hile (Eds.), Mental health computing (pp. 34-53). New York: Springer.
23.
Greist, J. H., & Klein, M. H. (1980). Computer programs for patients, clinicians, and researchers in psychiatry. In J. Sidowski, J. Johnson,& T. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental care delivery systems (pp. 161-182). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24.
Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., Erdman, H. P., & Jefferson, J. W. (1983). Clinical computer applications in mental health. Journal of Medical Systems, 7, 175-185.
25.
Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., & Van Cura, L. J. (1973). A computer interview for psychiatric patient target symptoms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 247-253.
26.
Harris, G., Hilton, N., & Rice, M. (1993). Patients admitted to psychiatric hospital: Presenting problems and resolution at discharge. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 267-285.
27.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1967). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
28.
Holcomb, W. R., Parker, J. C., & Leong, G. B. (1997). Outcomes of inpatients treated on a VA psychiatric unit and a substance abuse treatment unit. Psychiatric Services, 48, 699-707.
29.
Kazdin, A. E. (1998). Research design in clinical psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Kiesler, D. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 110-136.
31.
Longabaugh, R., Fowler, R., Stout, R., & Kriebel, G. (1983). Validation of a problem-focused nomenclature. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 453-461.
32.
Maruish, M. E. (Ed.). (1994). Introduction. In The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
McCullough, L., Farrell, A. D., & Longabaugh, R. (1986). The development of a microcomputer-based mental health information system: A potential tool for bridging the scientist-practitioner gap. American Psychologist, 41, 207-214.
34.
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., & O’Brien, C. P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 26-33.
35.
Mintz, J., & Kiesler, D. (1982). Individualized measures of psychotherapy outcome. In P. Kendall & J. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp.491-543). New York: John Wiley.
36.
Moreland, K. L., Fowler, R. D., & Honaker, L. M. (1994). Future directions in the use of psychological treatment planning and outcome assessment: Predictions and recommendations. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 581-602). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Morlan, K. K., & Tan, S. Y. (1998). Comparison of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 885-894.
38.
Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1996). Treatment outcome measures: Nomothetic or idiographic?Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 164-167.
39.
Petrie, K., & Abell, W. (1995). Responses of parasuicides to a computerized interview. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 415-418.
40.
Plutchik, R., & Karasu, T. B. (1991). Computers in psychotherapy: An overview. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 33-44.
41.
Rabinowitz, J., Modai, I., & Inbar-Saban, N. (1994). Understanding who improves after psychiatric hospitalization. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 89, 152-158.
42.
Roy-Byrne, P., Dagadakis, C., Ries, R., Decker, K., Jones, R., Bolte, M. A., et al. (1995). A psychiatrist-rated battery of measures for assessing the clinical status of psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatric Services, 46, 347-352.
43.
Russo, J., Roy-Byrne, P., Jaffe, C., Ries, R., Dagadakis, C., Dwyer-O’Connor, E., et al. (1997). The relationship of patient-administered outcome assessments to quality of life and physician ratings: Validity of the BASIS-32. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 24, 200-214.
44.
Sederer, L., Hermann, R., & Dickey, B. (1995). The imperative of outcome assessment in psychiatry. American Journal of Medical Quality, 10, 127-132.
45.
Stevenson, J., McCullough, L., Stout, R., & Longabaugh, R. (1989). The development of an individualized, problem-oriented psychiatric outcome measure. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 12, 134-158.
46.
St. Martin, S. R. (2003). Validity of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER)in a psychiatric outpatient population. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
47.
Strong, J. E. (2002). Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) interview with a psychiatric inpatient population. Master’s thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
48.
Strong, J. E., & Farrell, A. D. (2003). Evaluation of the Computerized Assessment System for Psychotherapy Evaluation and Research (CASPER) interview with a psychiatric inpatient population. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 967-984.
49.
Strupp, H. H. (1996). The tripartite model and the Consumer Reportsstudy. American Psychologist, 51, 1017-1024.
50.
Williams, P. (1979). Deciding how to treat: The relevance of psychiatric diagnosis. Psychological Medicine, 9, 179-186.
