This two-part study sought to determine the equivalence of the California Verbal Learning Tests (CVLT-1 and CVLT-2) in the detection of malingering in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain. Part 1 compared a variety of scores from the two versions in carefully matched patient groups. Part 2 used criterion groups (known-groups) methodology to examine the relative rates of false positive (FP) errors across the two versions. Participants were 442 TBI (CVLT-1 = 310; CVLT-2 = 132) and 378 chronic pain patients (CVLT-1 = 250; CVLT-2 = 128). Overall, the CVLT-2 was more difficult than the CVLT-1, with the chronic pain patients showing larger version effects than the TBI patients. The two versions of the CVLT were equally accurate in detecting malingering in TBI and chronic pain. However, they were not interchangeable. The use of CVLT-1 cutoffs with the CVLT-2 may result in an increased risk of FP error. Appropriate cutoff adjustment in clinical practice is recommended.
Ashendorf, L., O'Bryant, S.E., & McCaffrey, R.J. (2003). Specificity of malingering detection strategies in older adults using the CVLT and WCST. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 255-262.
2.
Bianchini, K.J., Greve, K.W., & Glynn, G. (2005). On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal , 5, 404-417.
Butcher, J.N., Dahlstrom, W.G., Graham, J.R., Tellegren, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota .
5.
Curtis, K.L., Greve, K.W., Bianchini, K.J., & Brennan, A. (2006). California Verbal Learning Test indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Sensitivity and specificity in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 13, 46-61.
6.
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test (Rev. ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
7.
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
8.
Doane, B.M., Greve, K.W., & Bianchini, K.J. (2005). Agreement between the Abbreviated and Standard Portland Digit Recognition Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 99-104.
9.
Donders, J., & Boonstra, T. (2007). Correlates of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 21, 319-326.
10.
Etherton, J.L., Bianchini, K.J., Ciota, M.A., Heinly, M.T., & Greve, K.W. (2006). Pain, malingering, and the WAIS-III Working Memory Index. The Spine Journal, 6, 61-71.
11.
Etherton, J.L., Bianchini, K.J., Heinly, M.T., & Greve, K.W. (2006). Pain, malingering, and performance on the WAIS-III Processing Speed Index. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1218-1237.
12.
Greiffenstein, M.F., Baker, W.J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesic measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218-224.
13.
Greve, K.W., & Bianchini, K.J. (2006). Classification accuracy of the Portland Digit Recognition Test in traumatic brain injury: Results of a known-groups analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist , 20, 816-830.
14.
Greve, K.W., Bianchini, K.J., & Doane, B.M. (2006). Classification accuracy of the test of memory malingering in traumatic brain injury: Results of a known-groups analysis . Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1176-1190.
15.
Greve, K.W., Bianchini, K.J., Love, J.M., Brennan, A., & Heinly, M.T. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 491-512.
16.
Heinly, M.T., Greve, K.W., Bianchini, K.J., Love, J.L., & Brennan, A. (2005). WAIS Digit Span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury . Assessment, 12, 429-444.
17.
Lees-Haley, P.R., English, L.T., & Glenn, W.J. (1991). A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports, 68, 203-210.
18.
Martens, M., Donders, J., & Millis, S.R. (2001). Evaluation of invalid response sets after traumatic head injury. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2, 1-18.
19.
Meyers, J.E., Millis, S.R., & Volkert, K. (2002). A validity index for the MMPI-2. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 157-169.
20.
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86-87.
21.
Millis, S.R., & Putnam, S.H. (1997). The CVLT in the assessment of financially compensable mild head injury: Further development. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Neuropsychology Society, Bergen, Norway.
22.
Millis, S.R., Putnam, S.H., Adams, K.M., & Ricker, J.H. (1995). The California Verbal Learning Test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 463-471.
23.
Millis, S.R., & Volinsky, C.T. (2001). Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: Beyond malingering tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 809-828.
24.
Millis, S.R., Wolfe, P., Larrabee, G., Hanks, R., Sweet, J., & Fichtenberg, N. (2007). The California Verbal Learning Test-II in the detection of incomplete effort. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(S1), 193-194.
25.
Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E.M., & Condit, D.C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration . Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094-1102.
26.
Moore, B.A. & Donders, J. (2004). Predictors of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 975-984.
27.
Rabin, L.A., Barr, W.B., & Burton, L.A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33-65.
28.
Slick, D.J., Sherman, E.M.S., & Iverson, G.L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingering neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545-561.
29.
Sweet, J.J., Wolfe, P., Sattlberger, E., Numan, B., Rosenfeld, J.P., Clingerman, S., et al. (2000). Further investigation of traumatic brain injury versus insufficient effort with the California Verbal Learning Test . Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 105-113.
30.
Tombaugh, T. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering manual. New York: MultiHealth Systems.
31.
Trueblood, W. (1994). Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of malingered and other invalid WAIS-R and clinical memory data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 597-607.
