The latent structure of the California Verbal Learning Test—Second Edition (CVLT-II) was examined in a clinical sample of 223 persons with traumatic brain injury that had been screened to remove individuals with complicating premorbid (e.g., psychiatric) or comorbid (e.g., financial compensation seeking) histories. Analyses incorporated the z scores from 12 CVLT-II variables. Maximum-likelihood confirmatory analyses were performed to test the fit and parsimony of four hypothetical models. A four-factor model, consisting of Attention Span, Learning Efficiency, Delayed Memory, and Inaccurate Memory, met all the a priori specified criteria for model fit and parsimony. This model was consistent with that identified previously in a confirmatory factor analysis of the CVLT-II standardization sample. The results support the construct validity of the CVLT-II in individuals with traumatic brain injury and indicate that a multifactorial interpretation is appropriate for clinical practice.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
2.
Baldo, J.V., Delis, D., Kramer, J., & Shimamura, A. ( 2002). Memory performance on the California Verbal Learning Test-II: Findings from patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 539-546.
3.
Bell, B.D., Hermann, B.P., & Seidenberg, M. (2004). Significant discrepancies between immediate and delayed WMS-III indices are rare in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 18, 303-311.
4.
Burton, D.B., Ryan, J.J., Axelrod, B.N., Schellenberger, T., & Richards, H.M. (2003). A confirmatory factor analysis of the WMS-III in a clinical sample with cross-validation in the standardization sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 629-641.
5.
Caruso, J.C., & Cliff, N. ( 1999). The properties of equally and differentially weighted WAIS-III factor scores. Psychological Assessment, 11, 198-206.
Coronado, V.G., Johnson, R.L., Faul, M., & Kegler, S.R. ( 2006). Incidence rates of hospitalization related to traumatic brain injury-12 states, 2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55, 201-204.
8.
Crawford, J.R., Sutherland, D., & Garthwaite, P.H. (2008). On the reliability and standard errors of measurement of contrast measures from the D-KEFS. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 1069-1073.
9.
Curtiss, G., Vanderploeg, R.D., Spencer, J., & Salazar, A.M. ( 2001). Patterns of verbal learning and memory in traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , 7, 574-585.
10.
Delis, D.C., Jacobson, M., Bondi, M.W., Hamilton, J.M., & Salmon, D.P. ( 2003). The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: Lessons from memory assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 936-946.
11.
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. ( 2000). California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
12.
Delis, D.C., Wetter, S.R., Jacobson, M.W., Peavy, G., Hamilton, J., Gongvatana A., et al. (2005). Recall discriminability: Utility of a new CVLT-II measure in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 708-715.
13.
Dodson, C.S., Bawa, S., & Krueger, L.E. ( 2007). Aging, meta-memory, and high-confidence errors: A misrecollection account. Psychology and Aging, 22, 122-133.
14.
Donders, J. ( 2006). Performance discrepancies on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample. Psychological Assessment, 18, 458-463.
15.
Donders, J. ( 2008a). A confirmatory factor analysis of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample. Assessment, 15, 123-131.
16.
Donders, J. ( 2008b). Subtypes of learning and memory on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 741-748.
17.
Donders, J., & Nienhuis, J.B. (2007). Utility of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition, recall discriminability indices in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 354-358.
18.
Donders, J., Tulsky, D.S., & Zhu, J. ( 2001). Criterion validity of new WAIS-III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 892-898.
19.
Eslinger, P.J., Zappala, G., Chakara, F., & Barrett, A.M. ( 2007). Cognitive impairments after TBI. In N. D. Zasler, D. I. Katz, R. D., & Zafonte (Eds.), Brain injury medicine (pp. 779-790). New York: Demos.
20.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. ( 1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-50.
21.
Hanks, R.A., Ricker, J.H., & Millis, S.R. ( 2004). Empirical evidence regarding the neuropsychological assessment of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. In J. H. Ricker (Ed.), Differential diagnosis in adult neuropsychological assessment (pp. 218-242). New York: Springer .
22.
Hatcher, L. ( 1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
23.
Jacobs, M.L., & Donders, J. ( 2007). Criterion validity of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 143-149.
24.
Kaufman, A.S., & Lichtenberger, E.O. (1999). Essentials of WAIS-III assessment. New York: Wiley.
25.
Lange, R.T., Chelune, G.J., Taylor, M.J., Woddward, T.S., & Heaton, R.K. ( 2006). Development of demographic norms for four new WAIS-III/WMS-III indexes. Psychological Assessment, 18, 174-182.
26.
Martin, T.A., Donders, J., & Thompson, E. ( 2000). Potential of and problems with new measures of psychometric intelligence after traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 402-408.
27.
McCabe, D.P., Smith, A.D., & Parks, C.M. ( 2007). Inadvertent plagiarism in young and older adults: The role of working memory capacity in reducing memory errors. Memory & Cognition, 35, 231-241.
28.
Moore, B.A., & Donders, J. ( 2004). Predictors of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 975-984.
29.
Mottram, L., & Donders, J. ( 2005). Construct validity of the California Verbal Learning Test-Children’s Version (CVLT-C) after pediatric traumatic brain injury . Psychological Assessment, 17, 212-217.
30.
Roebuck-Spencer, T., & Sherer, M. ( 2008). Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. In J. E. Morgan, J. E. & J. H. Ricker (Eds.). Textbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 411-429). New York: Taylor & Francis.
31.
SAS Institute. (1990). SAS/STAT user’s guide (Version 6, 4th ed., Vol. 1). Cary, NC: Author.
32.
Sheslow, D., & Adams, W. ( 1999).Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning-Second Edition. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
33.
Stricker, J.L., Brown, G.G., Wixted, J., Baldo, J.V., & Delis, D.C. ( 2002). New semantic and serial clustering indices for the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition: Background, rationale, and formulae. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 425-435.
34.
Thompson, B. ( 2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Tulsky, D.S., Chelune, G.J., & Price, L.R. ( 2004). Development of a new Delayed Memory Index for the WMS-III . Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 563-576.
36.
Van der Heijden, P., & Donders, J. ( 2003). A confirmatory factor analysis of the WAIS-III in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 59-65.
37.
Vanderploeg, R.D., Crowell, T.A., & Curtiss, G. ( 2001). Verbal learning and memory deficits in traumatic brain injury: Encoding, consolidation, and retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 185-195.
38.
Wiegner, S., & Donders, J. ( 1999). Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 159-170.
