Abstract

Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Crowe, M. L., Campbell, W. K., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2019). Using dominance analysis to decompose narcissism and its relation to aggression and externalizing outcomes. Assessment, 26, 260-270. doi: 10.1177/1073191116685811
In the above referenced article, in tables 1 and 2, the negative correlations have been incorrectly set as positive.
The correct version of tables are given below:
Outcome Measure Correlations.
Note: *=p<.05, **=p<.01; RPQ = Reactive-Proactive Questionnaire, SRASBM = Self-report of Aggressive and Social Behaviors Measure, SRASBM-Prp = Proactive Relational Aggression, SRASBM-RP = Reactive Relational Aggression, SRASBM-Rom = Romantic Relational Aggression, CAB = Crime and Analogous Behavior Scale, RSE = Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale; Correlations above the diagonal are from Sample 2, correlation below the diagonal are from Sample 1
Zero-order Relations and General Dominance Values for FFNI Variant and Factor Scales.
Note: *=p<.05, **=p<.01; S1: Sample 1; S2 = Sample 2; FFNI = Five Factor Narcissism Inventory, RPQ = Reactive-Proactive Questionnaire, SRASBM = Self-report of Aggressive and Social Behaviors Measure, CAB = Crime and Analogous Behavior Scale, RSE = Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale; GD Weight = General dominance weight; The proportion of R2 accounted for is derived from the ratio of the general dominance weight to the total R2; Percentages with mismatching superscripts indicate that the general dominance weights are significantly different from one another based on bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Matching superscripts indicate no significant differences between weights.
