Abstract
Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIE) poses a threat to one’s moral beliefs that can lead to prolonged and impairing mental health outcomes related to moral injury (MI). In a large German-speaking sample (N = 364, 48.9% female) of high-risk populations (legal, health care, military, security, social sector, press), we administered the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) and Moral Injury and Distress Scale (MIDS) to investigate the frequency of PMIE exposure and MI outcome and distress. About three-quarters of the sample endorsed having experienced a PMIE, while 11.5% and 5.5.% screened positive for clinically meaningful MI on the MIDS and MIOS, respectively. Both the MIOS and the MIDS demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency. The CFA provided further evidence for their factorial validity; correlations supported aspects of convergent and discriminant validity. Exposure to PMIE and MI is a highly prevalent phenomenon across different occupational fields in Germany. The German versions of both scales seem suitable for assessing MI outcome and distress.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
