Ethical Considerations in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract

Background

The second half of the 20th century saw not only important developments in medical science and technology, but also a rapid growth in the application of biomedical ethics in medical decision making. Withdrawal of treatment, allowing to die, informed consent, and patient autonomy are concerns that now comprise a part of the overall medical treatment, particularly in patients with head and neck cancers.

Methods

The author discusses ethical issues relating to disfigurement/dysfunction in head and neck cancer patients and examines the aspects of “principlism” — autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Two case reports are presented to illustrate the ethical challenges that may confront physicians who treat head and neck cancer patients.

Results

Head and neck oncology generates unique problems relating to disfigurement and dysfunction. An algorithm that considers the patient's medical good and greater good, as well as the goods of others, can assist in arriving at appropriate ethical decisions.

Conclusions

Bioethical decision making requires the integration of virtues with principles, followed by the application of these standards to each patient.

References

Some might view quality of life issues as having but a tangential relationship to ethics, but to do so would be to define ethics too narrowly. Ethics is more than just principles, rules, and virtues. Normative ethics is inevitably grounded upon value systems, and it is those value systems that will be operative in making quality of life decisions.

Dropkin

M.J.

, Scott

D.W.

. Body image reintegration and coping effectiveness after head and neck surgery. The Journal: Official Publication of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses. 1983; 2: 7–16.

Dropkin

M.J.

, Malgady

, Scott

D.W.

. Scaling of disfigurement and dysfunction in postoperative head and neck patients. Head Neck Surg. 1983; 6: 559–570.

Dropkin

M.J.

. Coping with disfigurement and dysfunction and length of hospital stay after head and neck cancer surgery. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 1997; 15: 22–26.

Pruyn

J.F.A.

, de Jong

P.C.

, Bosman

L.J.

. Psychosocial aspects of head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol. 1986; 11: 469–474.

Rapoport

, Kreitler

, Chaitchik

. Psychosocial problems in head-and-neck cancer patients and their change with time since diagnosis. Ann Oncol. 1993; 4: 69–73.

Hassan

S.J.

, Weymuller

E.A.

. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993; 15: 485–496.

List

M.A.

, D'Antonio

L.L.

, Cella

D.F.

. The performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer therapy: Head and Neck Scale. Cancer. 1996; 77: 2294–2301.

Katz

M.R.

, Irish

J.C.

, Devins

G.M.

. Reliability and validity of an observer-rated disfigurement scale for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2000; 22: 132–141.

10.

Weymuller

E.A.

, Yueh

, Deleyiannis

W.B.

. Quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126: 329–335.

11.

Schwartz

, Patrick

D.L.

, Yueh

. Quality-of-life outcomes in the evaluation of head and neck cancer treatments. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127: 673–678.

12.

Portenoy

R.K.

. Quality-of-life issues in patients with head and neck cancer. In Harrison

L.B.

, Sessions

R.B.

, and Hong

W.K.

eds. Head and Neck Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1999: 217–231.

13.

Conley

. Ethics in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981; 107: 655–657.

14.

Conley

. The meaning of life-threatening disease in the area of the head and neck. Acta Otolaryngol. 1985; 99: 201–204.

15.

Frank

H.A.

, Davidson

T.M.

. Ethical dilemmas in head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 1989; 11: 22–26.

16.

O'Donovan

L.J.

. A profession of trust: reflections on a fundamental virtue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 118: 565–570.

17.

Sulmasy

D.P.

. Appearance and morality: ethics and otolaryngology – head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 126: 4–7.

18.

Pellegrino

E.D.

. Ethical considerations in head and neck cancer. In: Harrison

L.B.

, Sessions

R.B.

, Hong

W.K.

, eds. Head and Neck Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1999: 1039–1048.

19.

Dropkin

M.J.

. Disfigurement and dysfunction with head and neck cancer surgery. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 1998; 16: 28–29.

20.

Veatch

R.M.

. Doctor does not know best: why in the new century physicians must stop trying to benefit patients. J Med Philos. 2000; 25: 701–721.

21.

Quill

T.E.

, Brody

. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125: 763–769.

22.

Beauchamp

T.L.

, Childress

J.H.

. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001. Readers interested in the sources and development of these principles are referred to this text in particular.

23.

Pellegrino

E.D.

, Thomasma

D.C.

. The Virtues in Medical Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993.

24.

Gert

, Culver

C.M.

, Clouser

K.D.

. Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1997.

25.

Faden

R.R.

, Beauchamp

T.L.

. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.

26.

Pellegrino

E.D.

, Thomasma

D.C.

. For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1988: 54–55.

27.

Cassell

E.J.

. The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1991.

28.

Pellegrino

E.D.

, Thomasma

D.C.

. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1981.