Quality of Care in Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Background:

High-quality health care is safe, effective, efficient, timely, patient-centered, and equitable. A current focus on quality assessment and improvement in oncology care, specifically in surgical oncology, is aimed toward providing optimal health services that consistently fulfill these elements for cancer patients.

Methods:

In surgical oncology, outcomes have historically focused on perioperative morbidity and mortality. To assess care metrics in the United States, we review structural and process measures of quality care in surgical oncology.

Results:

Most quality metrics in surgical oncology pertain to structural measures of care such as accreditation, procedure volumes, provider specialization, and multidisciplinary teams. Process measures, such as surgical technique, are also important but are not easily quantified.

Conclusions:

Policy implications of quality metrics in surgical oncology include formal regionalization of care, changes in payment structures, and public reporting. More comprehensive assessments of outcomes are gaining traction in the field of surgical oncology; this shift in focus to the patient's perspective will enhance the quality of care delivered by surgical oncologists.

References

McGlynn

E.A.

, Asch

S.M.

, Adams

. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(26): 2635–2645.

Malin

J.L.

, Schneider

E.C.

, Epstein

A.M.

. Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(4): 626–634.

United States Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.

Aiello Bowles

E.J.

, Tuzzio

, Wiese

C.J.

. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer. 2008; 112(4): 934–942.

Donabedian

. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44(3 suppl): 166–203.

Beck

A.H.

. The Flexner Report and the Standardization of American Medical Education. JAMA. 2004; 291(17): 2139–2140.

Flexner

. Medical Education in the United States and Canada Bulletin Number Four. New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1910.

Luce

J.M.

, Bindman

A.B.

, Lee

P.R.

. A brief history of health care quality assessment and improvement in the United States. West J Med. 1994; 160(3): 263–268.

Commission on Cancer.

A multidisciplinary program of the American College of Surgeons.

General Information. http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/cocar.html. Accessed July 13, 2009.

10.

Commission on Cancer.

A multidisciplinary program of the American College of Surgeons.

Cancer Program Accredition. http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/whatis.html. Accessed July 13, 2009.

11.

Commission on Cancer.

A multidisciplinary program of the American College of Surgeons.

National Cancer Data Base. http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/index.html. Accessed July 13, 2009.

12.

Bilimoria

K.Y.

, Stewart

A.K.

, Winchester

D.P.

. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15(3): 683–690.

13.

American College of Surgeons.

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Program Overview. https://acsnsqip.org/main/about_overview.asp. Accessed July 13, 2009.

14.

American College of Surgeons.

National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers.

Accreditation Application. http://www.accreditedbreastcenters.org/accreditation/application.html. Accessed July 13, 2009.

15.

Begg

C.B.

, Cramer

L.D.

, Hoskins

W.J.

. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998; 280(20): 1747–1751.

16.

Birkmeyer

J.D.

, Siewers

A.E.

, Finlayson

E.V.

. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15): 1128–1137.

17.

Birkmeyer

J.D.

, Stukel

T.A.

, Siewers

A.E.

. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(22): 2117–2127.

18.

Daly

J.M.

. Society of Surgical Oncology presidential address: volume, outcome, and surgical specialization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004; 11(2): 107–114.

19.

Halm

E.A.

, Lee

, Chassin

M.R.

. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137(6): 511–520.

20.

Hannan

E.L.

, Radzyner

, Rubin

. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery. 2002; 131(1): 6–15.

21.

Hillner

B.E.

, Smith

T.J.

, Desch

C.E.

. Hospital and Physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(11): 2327–2340.

22.

Kizer

K.W.

. The volume-outcome conundrum. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(22): 2159–2161.

23.

Luft

H.S.

, Bunker

J.P.

, Enthoven

A.C.

. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301(25): 1364–1369.

24.

The Leapfrog Group. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/about_us. Accessed July 13, 2009.

25.

The Leapfrog Group: Fact Sheet: Evidence-Based Hospital Referral. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-Evidence-based_Hospital_Referral_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2009.

26.

Fong

, Gonen

, Rubin

. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(4): 540–544; discussion 544-547.

27.

Bilimoria

K.Y.

, Bentrem

D.J.

, Feinglass

J.M.

. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(28): 4626–4633.

28.

Schell

M.T.

, Barcia

, Spitzer

A.L.

. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system. HPB Surg. 2008; 2008: 825940.

29.

Bilimoria

K.Y.

, Phillips

J.D.

, Rock

C.E.

. Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16(7): 1799–1808.

30.

Grilli

, Minozzi

, Tinazzi

. Do specialists do it better? The impact of specialization on the processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1998; 9(4): 365–374.

31.

Aiello Bowles

E.J.

, Tuzzio

, Wiese

C.J.

. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer. 2008; 112(4): 934–942.

32.

Firth-Cozens

. Multidisciplinary teamwork: the good, bad, and everything in between. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10(2): 65–66.

33.

Houssami

, Sainsbury

. Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42(15): 2480–2491.

34.

Stephens

M.R.

, Lewis

W.G.

, Brewster

A.E.

. Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2006; 19(3): 164–171.

35.

Fleissig

, Jenkins

, Catt

. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(11): 935–943.

36.

Davison

A.G.

, Eraut

C.D.

, Haque

A.S.

. Telemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings. J Telemed Telecare. 2004; 10(3): 140–143.

37.

Fallowfield

, Jenkins

. Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 1999; 35(11): 1592–1597.

38.

Firth-Cozens

. Cultures for improving patient safety through learning: the role of teamwork. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10(Suppl 2): ii26–ii31.

39.

Jenkins

V.A.

, Fallowfield

L.J.

, Poole

. Are members of multidisciplinary teams in breast cancer aware of each other's informational roles? Qual Health Care. 2001; 10(2): 70–75.

40.

Desch

C.E.

, McNiff

K.K.

, Schneider

E.C.

. American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(21): 3631–3637.

41.

Commission on Cancer. A Multidisciplinary Program of the American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Database: National Quality Forum Endorsed Commission on Cancer Measures for Quality of Cancer Care for Breast and Colorectal Cancers. http://www.facs.org/cancer/qualitymeasures.html. Accessed July 13, 2009.

42.

Chang

G.J.

, Rodriguez-Bigas

M.A.

, Skibber

J.M.

. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(6): 433–441.

43.

Wong

S.L.

, Ji

, Hollenbeck

B.K.

. Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA. 2007; 298(18): 2149–2154.

44.

Ridgway

P.F.

, Darzi

A.W.

. The role of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. Cancer Control. 2003; 10(3): 205–211.

45.

Heald

R.J.

, Husband

E.M.

, Ryall

R.D.

. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982; 69(10): 613–616.

46.

Landheer

M.L.

, Therasse

, van de Velde

C.J.

. The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002; 28(6): 571–602.

47.

The American Society of Breast Surgeons. Mastery of Breast Surgery: Pilot Program Background & History. http://www.breastsurgeons.org/mastery/background.php. Accessed July 13, 2009.

48.

Liu

J.H.

, Zingmond

D.S.

, McGory

M.L.

. Disparities in the Utilization of High-Volume Hospitals for Complex Surgery. JAMA. 2006; 296(16): 1973–1980.

49.

Dudley

R.A.

, Johansen

K.L.

, Brand

. Selective referral to highvolume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000; 283(9): 1159–1166.

50.

Werner

R.M.

, Goldman

L.E.

, Dudley

R.A.

. Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. JAMA. 2008; 299(18): 2180–2187.

51.

, Parikh

, Yermilov

. The surgeon's role in the quality of oncologic care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007; 5(6): 565–567.