A “grandmother cell” is a hypothetical neuron that responds only to a highly complex, specific, and meaningful stimulus, such as the image of one’s grandmother. The term originated in a parable Jerry Lettvin told in 1967. A similar concept had been systematically developed a few years earlier by Jerzy Konorski who called such cells “gnostic” units. This essay discusses the origin, influence, and current status of these terms and of the alternative view that complex stimuli are represented by the pattern of firing across ensembles of neurons.
Adrian ED, Matthews B.1927. The action of light on the eye. Part 1. The discharge of impulses in the optic nerve and its relation to the electric changes in the retina. J Physiol97:378-414.
2.
Allman JM, Kaas JH. 1971. A representation of the visual field in the caudal third of the middle temporal gyrus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). Brain Res31:85-101.
3.
Anstis SM. 1975. What does visual perception tell us about visual coding? In: Gazzaniga MS, Blakemore C, editors. Handbook of psychobiology. New York: Academic Press. p 269-323.
4.
Barlow HB. 1953. Summation and inhibition in the frog’s retina. J Physiol119:69-88.
5.
Barlow HB. 1972. Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology. Perception1:371-394.
6.
Barlow HB. 1995. The neuron in perception. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p 415-434.
7.
Blakemore C.1973. The language of vision. New Scientist58:674-677.
8.
Boring EG. 1950. A history of experimental psychology. 2nd ed.New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
9.
Caramazza A.2000. The organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor-in-chief. The new cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p 1037-1046.
10.
Churchland PS. 1986. Neurophilosophy: toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
11.
Cowey A.1994. Cortical visual areas and the neurobiology of higher visual processes. In: Farah MJ, Ratcliff G, editors. The neuropsychology of high-level vision: collected tutorial essays. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum. p 3-31.
12.
Desimone R.1991. Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. J Cognit Neurosci3:1-8.
13.
Fonberg E.1974. Professor Jerzy Konorski. Acta Neurobiol Exp34:655-664.
14.
Frisby JP. 1980. Seeing. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
15.
Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR. 1998. Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind. New York: W. W. Norton.
16.
Gross CG. 1968. Review of J. Konorski, Integrative activity of the brain (1967). Science160:652-653.
17.
Gross CG. 1992. Representation of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond335:3-10.
18.
Gross CG. 1998a. Brain, vision, memory: tales in the history of neuroscience. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
19.
Gross CG. 1998b. Galen and the squealing pig. The Neuroscientist4:216-221.
20.
Gross CG. 2000. Coding for visual categories in the human brain. Nat Neurosci3:855-856.
21.
Gross CG, Bender DB, Rocha-Miranda CE. 1969. Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey. Science166:1303-1306.
22.
Gross CG, Rocha-Miranda CE, Bender DB. 1972. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. J Neurophysiol35:96-111.
23.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1962. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in cats visual cortex. J Physiol Lond160:106-154.
24.
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1965. Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Neurophysiol28:229-289.
25.
James W.1890. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
26.
Konorski J.1948. Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
27.
Konorski J.1967. Integrative activity of the brain; an interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Konorski J.1974. Jerzy Konorski. In: Lindzey G, editor. A history of psychology in autobiography. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
29.
Kreiman G, Fried I, Koch C.2001. Single neuron responses in humans during binocular rivalry and flash suppression. Abstr Soc Neurosci27.
30.
Kreiman G, Koch C, Fried I.2000. Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe. Nat Neurosci3:946-953.
31.
Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH. 1959. What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proc Inst Radio Engin47:1940-1951.
32.
Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH. 1961. Two remarks on the visual system of the frog. In: Rosenblith WA, editor. Symposium on principles of sensory communication. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 757-776.
Marr D.1982. Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
35.
Martin A, Underleider LG, Haxby JV. 2000. Category specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor-in-chief. The new cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p 1023-1036.
36.
Mishkin M.1966. Visual mechanisms beyond the striate cortex. In: Russel RW, editor. Frontiers in physiological psychology. New York: Academic Press. p. 93-119.
37.
Muller JM. 1838 [1965]. On the specific energies of nerves. In: Herrnstein R, Boring E, editors. A sourcebook of the history of psychology. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
38.
Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W.1982. Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res47:329-342.
39.
Pribram KH, Mishkin M.1955. Simultaneous and successive visual discrimination by monkeys with inferotemporal lesions. J Comp Physiol Psychol48:198-202.
40.
Rolls ET. 1984. Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Hum Neurobiol3:209-222.
41.
Rosenblith WA, editor. 1961. Symposium on principles of sensory communication. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
42.
Rozenzweig MR, Leiman AL, Breedlove SM. 1999. Biological psychology: an introduction to behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. 2nd ed.Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
43.
Roth P.1969. Portnoy’s complaint. New York: Random House.
44.
Sherrington CS. 1940. Man on his nature. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
45.
Tanaka K.1996. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci19:109-139.
46.
Yamane S, Kaji S, Kawano K.1988. What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey?Exp Brain Res73:209-214.
