The brain is neither uniform nor composed of similar modules but is rather a mosaic of different and highly interconnected regions. Accordingly, knowledge of functional connectivity between brain regions is crucial to understanding perception, cognition, and behavior. Functional connectivity methods estimate similarities between activity recorded in different regions of the brain. They are often applied to resting state activity, thus providing measures that are by nature task independent. The spatial patterns revealed by functional connectivity are not only shaped by the underlying anatomical structure of the brain but also partially depend on the history of task-driven coactivations. Inter-subject differences in functional connectivity may, at least to some degree, underlie variability observed in task performance across healthy subjects and in behavioral impairments in neurological patients. In this respect, recent studies have demonstrated that behavioral deficits in patients with brain injury are not only due to local tissue damage but also due to altered functional connectivity among structurally intact regions connected to the damaged site. Studies based on functional connectivity have the potential to advance basic understanding of how brain lesions induce neuropsychological syndromes. Furthermore, they may eventually suggest improved rehabilitation strategies for patients with brain injury, through the design of individualized treatment and recovery protocols.
AlstottJBreakspearMHagmannPCammounLSpornsO. 2009. Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol5:e1000408.
2.
BaldassarreALewisCMCommitteriGSnyderAZRomaniGLCorbettaM. 2012. Individual variability in functional connectivity predicts performance of a perceptual task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A109:3516–21.
3.
BattelliLAlvarezGACarlsonTPascual-LeoneA. 2009. The role of the parietal lobe in visual extinction studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci21:1946–55.
4.
BeckmannCFDe LucaMDevlinJTSmithSM. 2005. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci360:1001–13.
5.
BianciardiMFukunagaMvan GelderenPHorovitzSGde ZwartJAShmueliK, and others. 2009. Sources of functional magnetic resonance imaging signal fluctuations in the human brain at rest: a 7 T study. Magn Reson Imaging27:1019–29.
6.
BiswalBYetkinFZHaughtonVMHydeJS. 1995. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med34:537–41.
7.
BrookesMJWoolrichMLuckhooHPriceDHaleJRStephensonMC, and others. 2011. Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A108:16783–8.
8.
CataniMFfytcheDH. 2005. The rises and falls of disconnection syndromes. Brain128:2224–39.
9.
CorbettaM. 2012. Functional connectivity and neurological recovery. Dev Psychobiol54:239–53.
10.
CordesDHaughtonVMArfanakisKCarewJDTurskiPAMoritzCH, and others. 2001. Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol22:1326–33.
11.
DamoiseauxJSRomboutsSABarkhofFScheltensPStamCJSmithSM, and others. 2006. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A103:13848-53.
12.
de PasqualeFDella PennaSSnyderAZLewisCMantiniDMarzettiL and others. 2010. Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A107:6040–5.
13.
DosenbachNUFairDAMiezinFMCohenALWengerKKDosenbachRA, and others. 2007. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A104:11073–8.
14.
EldaiefMCHalkoMABucknerRLPascual-LeoneA. 2011. Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the brain’s intrinsic activity in a frequency-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A108:21229–34.
15.
EngelAKFriesPSingerW. 2001. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci2:704–16.
16.
FoxMDCorbettaMSnyderAZVincentJLRaichleME. 2006a. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A103:10046–51.
17.
FoxMDRaichleME. 2007. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci8:700–11.
18.
FoxMDSnyderAZVincentJLCorbettaMVanERaichleME. 2005. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A102:9673–8.
19.
FoxMDSnyderAZVincentJLRaichleME. 2007. Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron56:171–84.
20.
FoxMDSnyderAZZacksJMRaichleME. 2006b. Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat Neurosci9:23–5.
21.
FristonKJ. 2011. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect1:13–36.
22.
GillebertCRMantiniDThijsVSunaertSDupontPVandenbergheR. 2011. Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention. Brain134:1694–709.
23.
GrefkesCFinkGR. 2011. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain134:1264–76.
24.
GreiciusMDKrasnowBReissALMenonV. 2003. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A100:253–8.
25.
GreiciusMDSupekarKMenonVDoughertyRF. 2009. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex19:72–8.
26.
GusnardDARaichleME. 2001. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci2:685–94.
27.
HagmannPCammounLGigandetXMeuliRHoneyCJWedeenVJ, and others. 2008. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol6:e159.
28.
HampsonMPetersonBSSkudlarskiPGatenbyJCGoreJC. 2002. Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images. Hum Brain Mapp15:247– 62.
29.
HeBJSnyderAZVincentJLEpsteinAShulmanGLCorbettaM. 2007. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron53:905–18.
30.
HillisAEWitykRJBarkerPBBeauchampNJGailloudPMurphyK, and others. 2002. Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain125:1094–104.
HoneyCJSpornsOCammounLGigandetXThiranJPMeuliR, and others. 2009. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A106:2035–40.
33.
HoyerEHCelnikPA. 2011. Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci29:395–409.
34.
Johansen-BergHRushworthMF. 2009. Using diffusion imaging to study human connectional anatomy. Annu Rev Neurosci32:75–94.
35.
KinsbourneM. 1970. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Trans Am Neurol Assoc95:143–6.
36.
KleinschmidtARusconiE. 2011. Gerstmann meets Geschwind: a crossing (or kissing) variant of a subcortical disconnection syndrome?Neuroscientist17:633–44.
37.
LaufsHHoltJLElfontRKramsMPaulJSKrakowK, and others. 2006. Where the BOLD signal goes when alpha EEG leaves. Neuroimage31:1408–18.
38.
LaufsHKrakowKSterzerPEgerEBeyerleASalek-HaddadiA, and others. 2003. Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A100:11053–8.
39.
LewisCMBaldassarreACommitteriGRomaniGLCorbettaM. 2009. Learning sculpts the spontaneous activity of the resting human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A106:17558–63.
40.
LoweMJMockBJSorensonJA. 1998. Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. Neuroimage7:119–32.
41.
LuJLiuHZhangMWangDCaoYMaQ, and others. 2011. Focal pontine lesions provide evidence that intrinsic functional connectivity reflects polysynaptic anatomical pathways. J Neurosci31:15065–71.
42.
MantiniDPerrucciMGDel GrattaCRomaniGLCorbettaM. 2007. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A104:13170–5.
43.
MasonMFNortonMIVan HornJDWegnerDMGraftonSTMacraeCN. 2007. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science315:393–5.
44.
MurphyKBirnRMHandwerkerDAJonesTBBandettiniPA. 2009. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced?Neuroimage44:893–905.
45.
NaeserMAMartinPIHoMTregliaEKaplanEBashirS, and others. 2012. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and aphasia rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil93(1 Suppl.):S26–34.
46.
NguyenDKBotezMI. 1998. Diaschisis and neurobehavior. Can J Neurol Sci25:5–12.
47.
OliveriMBisiachEBrighinaFPiazzaALa BuaVBuffaD, and others. 2001. rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect. Neurology57:1338–40.
48.
Pascual-LeoneAWalshVRothwellJ. 2000. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience—virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol10:232–7.
49.
PowerJDBarnesKASnyderAZSchlaggarBLPetersenSE. 2012. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage59:2142–54.
50.
RaichleMEGusnardDA. 2002. Appraising the brain’s energy budget. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99:10237–9.
51.
SalmelinRHariR. 1994. Characterization of spontaneous MEG rhythms in healthy adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol91:237–48.
SmithSMFoxPTMillerKLGlahnDCFoxPMMackayCE, and others. 2009. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A106:13040–5.
54.
TalelliPWallaceADileoneMHoadDCheeranBOliverR, and others. 2012. Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair26:976–87.
55.
Valero-CabreARushmoreRJPayneBR. 2006. Low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on the posterior parietal cortex induces visuotopically specific neglect-like syndrome. Exp Brain Res172:14–21.
56.
van den HeuvelMMandlRLuigjesJHulshoffPH. 2008. Microstructural organization of the cingulum tract and the level of default mode functional connectivity. J Neurosci28:10844–51.
57.
van der WerfYDSanz-ArigitaEJMenningSvan den HeuvelOA. 2010. Modulating spontaneous brain activity using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. BMC Neurosci11:145.
58.
Van DijkKRHeddenTVenkataramanAEvansKCLazarSWBucknerRL. 2010. Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J Neurophysiol103:297–321.
59.
Van EssenDCUgurbilK. 2012. The future of the human connectome. Neuroimage1299–310.
60.
VincentJLKahnISnyderAZRaichleMEBucknerRL. 2008. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol100:3328–42.
61.
WardNS. 2006. The neural substrates of motor recovery after focal damage to the central nervous system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil87(12Suppl. 2):S30–5.
62.
WestlakeKPNagarajanSS. 2011. Functional connectivity in relation to motor performance and recovery after stroke. Front Syst Neurosci5:8.
