BanduraA. (2006). Adolescent development from a genetic perspective. In PajaresF., & UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
2.
BleyN. S., & ThorntonC. A. (2001). Anchoring adolescents' understanding of math concepts in rich problem-solving environments.Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 299–314.
3.
CarbonneauK. J., MarleyS. C., & SeligJ. P. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives.Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400.
4.
ComptonD. L., FuchsL. S., FuchsD., LambertW., & HamlettC. (2012). The cognitive and academic profiles of reading and mathematics learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(1), 79–95.
5.
EllisE. S., & LenzB. K. (1996). Perspectives on instruction in learning strategies. In DeshlerD. D., EllisE. S., & LenzB. K. (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities (2nd ed.; pp. 9–60). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Co.
6.
KrawecJ., HuangJ., MontagueM., KresslerB., & De AlbaA. M. (2013). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on knowledge of math problem-solving processes of middle school students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 80–92.
7.
LaneK. L., Barton-ArwoodS. M., NelsonJ. R., & WehbyJ. (2008). Academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in a self-contained setting.Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(1), 43–62.
8.
MacciniP., & HughesC. A. (2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 10–21.
9.
MacciniP., MulcahyC. A., & WilsonM. G. (2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 58–74.
10.
MacciniP., & RuhlK. L. (2000). Effects of a graduated instructional sequence on the algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities.Education and Treatment of Children, 23(4), 465–489.
11.
MillerS. P., StringfellowJ. L., KaffarB. J., FerreiraD., & ManclD. B. (2011). Developing computation competence among students who struggle with mathematics.Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(2), 38–46.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
13.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics.Washington, DC: Authors.
14.
NelsonJ. R., BennerG. J., LaneK., & SmithB. W. (2004). An investigation of the academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders in public school settings.Exceptional Children, 71(1), 59–73.
15.
NelsonJ. R., BennerG. J., & MooneyP. (2008). Instructional practices for students with behavioral disorders: Strategies for reading, writing, and math.New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
NessB. M., & MiddletonM. J. (2012). A framework for implementing individualized self-regulated learning strategies in the classroom.Intervention in School and Clinic, 47(5), 267–275.
17.
RalstonN. C., BennerG. J., TsaiS., RiccominiP. J., & NelsonR. J. (2014). Mathematics instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A best-evidence synthesis.Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(1), 1–16.
18.
RoditiB. N., & SteinbergJ. (2007). The strategic math classroom: Executive function processes and mathematics learning. In MeltzerL. (Ed.), Executive function in education (pp. 237–260). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
ScheuermannA. M., DeshlerD. D., & SchumakerJ. B. (2009). The effects of the explicit inquiry routine on the performance of students with learning disabilities on one-variable equations.Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(2), 103–120.
20.
SchwabJ. R., TucciS., & JolivetteK. (2013). Integrating schema-based instruction and response cards for students with learning disabilities and challenging behaviors.Beyond Behavior22(3), 24–30.
21.
SwansonH. L., & JermanO. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature.Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 249–274.
22.
SwansonH. L., LussierC., & OroscoM. (2013). Effects of cognitive strategy interventions and cognitive moderators on word problem solving in children at risk for problem solving difficulties.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(4), 170–183.
23.
Temple-HarveyK., & VannestK. J. (2012). Students with emotional disturbance: Predictive factors of participation and performance on a statewide accountability assessment in math.Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 226–236.
24.
TempletonT. N., NeelR. S., & BloodE. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(4), 226–239.
25.
U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Thirty-fifth annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act.Washington, DC: Author.
26.
Van de WalleJ. A., KarpK., Bay-WilliamsJ. M., & WrayJ. A. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
27.
VerschaffelL., GreerB., & De CorteE. (2000). Making sense of word problems.Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
28.
WitzelB. S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings.Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 49–60.