The purpose of this research was to psychometrically evaluate the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), modified for use with new, first-time parents by extending the items of communication, sensuality, and sexuality. A total of 820 Swedish respondents, 6 months after the birth of their first child, participated in the study. Psychometric evaluation was conducted with factor analysis. The obtained factor structure was tested with multitrait analysis program. Thirty-three itemswere found to fit into a five-factor solution, explaining 50% of the total variance. Descriptive data revealed thatmost new parentswere satisfied with their intimate relationship in general, but dissatisfied with their sexual lives. Themodified DAS, now called the Quality of Dyadic Relationship Instrument includes 33 items and seems to be a useful, updated measurement for assessing quality of the intimate relationship in new first-time parents.
Ahlborg, T., Dahlöf, L. G., & Hallberg, L. R.-M. (in press). Quality of the intimate and sexual relationship in first-time parents six months after delivery. Journal of Sex Research.
2.
Ahlborg, T., & Strandmark, M. (2001). The baby was the focus of attention—first-time parents’ experiences of their intimate relationship. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 15, 318-325.
3.
Ahlborg, T., Strandmark, M.,& Dahlöf, L. G. (2000). First-time parents’ sexual relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 3, 127-139.
4.
Bäck-Wiklund, M., & Bergsten, B. (1997). Det moderna föräldraskapet[Modern parenthood]. Stockholm, Sweden: Natur & Kultur.
5.
Belsky, J. (1981). Early human experience: Afamily perspective. Developmental Psychology, 17, 3-23.
6.
Belsky, J., & Pensky, E. (1988). Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage & Family Review, 12, 133-156.
7.
Belsky, J., Spanier, G., & Rovine, M. (1983). Stability and change in marriage across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 567-577.
8.
Bird, C. E. (1999). Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amountanddivision of housework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 32-45.
9.
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: Adecade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
10.
Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1999). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Elek, S. M., Hudson, D. B.,& Bouffard, C. (2003). Marital and parenting satisfaction and infant care self-efficacy during the transition to parenthood: The effect of infant sex. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 26, 45-57.
12.
Glenn, N.,& McLanahan, S. (1982). Children and marital happiness, a further specification of the relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 63-72.
13.
Grote, N.,& Clark, M. (2001). Perceiving unfairness in the family: Cause or consequence of marital distress?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 281-293.
14.
Hays, R. D., & Hayashi, T. (1990). Beyond internal consistency: Rationale and users’ guide for Multitrait Analysis Program on the microcomputer. Behavior Research Methods: Instruments and Computers, 22, 167-175.
15.
Huston, T. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1991). Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: Alongitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 721-733.
16.
Hwang, P. (1999). Den nyfödda familjen [The newborn family]. In P. Hwang (Ed.), Spädbarnets psykologi (pp. 246-267). Stockholm, Sweden: Natur & Kultur.
17.
Kazak, A., Jarmas, A., & Snitzer, L. (1988). The assessment of marital satisfaction: An evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 82-91.
18.
Kurdek, L. A. (1999). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1283-1296.
19.
Lewis, J. (1988). The transition to parenthood II: Stability and change in marital structure. Family Process, 27, 273-283.
20.
Norton, R. (1983) Measuring marital quality: Acritical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 141-151.
21.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
O’Brien, M.,& Peyton, V. (2002). Parenting attitudes and marital intimacy: Alongitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 118-127.
23.
Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. (1982). Apsychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 739-741.
24.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 15-27.
25.
Statistics Sweden. (2002). Population statistics part 1-2. Orebro, Sweden: Official Statistics of Sweden.
26.
Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J.,& Ware, J. E. (1995). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey I: Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1349-1358.
27.
Wadsby, M. (2001). From pregnancy to parenthood: Astudy of couples’ relationships. Nordisk Psykologi, 53, 275-288.
28.
Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., Rogers, B. W.,& Reese, P. R. (1997). MAP-R for Windows: Multitrait/Multi-item analysis program—revised user’s guide. Boston: Health Assessment Lab.
