Sharing genetic risk information in families can be very challenging. However, the consequences of poor communication can be detrimental to the psychological health and well-being of parents and children in the present and the long term. Family nursing can play an important role in supporting family communication about genetic conditions. This role has several components: Firstly, improved assessment of families affected by or at risk from inherited genetic conditions. Secondly, facilitation of families’ discussions of genetic risk, especially between parents and children. Family nurses can use an integrated model of family care to support parents and their children in discussion of genetic risk information throughout the child’s development, including provision of assistance specifically for young people, who want to discuss the issues they face with informed nurses. Thirdly there is a role for family nurses in educating other specialist nurses in taking a more family-focused approach when they are caring for patients affected by genetic conditions. If the full benefits of genomic technologies are to be recognized and implemented, it is essential that the relational impact of the science be strengthened to enhance family relationships and support genetic risk information sharing.
AubeeluckA.BuchananH. (2007). The Huntington’s disease quality of life battery for carers: Reliability and validity. Clinical Genetics, 71, 434-445. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00784.x
2.
BieseckerB.ErbyL. (2008). Adaptation to living with a genetic condition or risk: A mini-review. Clinical Genetics, 74, 401-407. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01088.x
3.
Bronte-TinkewJ.RyanS.CarranoJ.MooreK. A. (2007). Resident fathers’ pregnancy intentions, prenatal behaviors, and links to involvement with infants. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 977-990. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00425.x
4.
CabreraN. J.FaganJ.FarrieD. (2008). Explaining the long reach of fathers’ prenatal involvement on later paternal engagement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1094-1107. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00551.x
CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
ChudleighJ.BuckinghamS.DignanJ.O’DriscollS.JohnsonK.ReesD.. . . MetcalfeA. (2016). Parents’ experiences of receiving the initial positive Newborn Screening (NBS) result for cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25, 1215-1226. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-9959-4
8.
D’Agincourt-CanningL. (2001). Experiences of genetic risk: Disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. Bioethics, 15, 231-247. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00234
DheensaS.MetcalfeA.WilliamsR. A. (2013). Men’s experiences of antenatal screening: A metasynthesis of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 121-133. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.05.004
11.
DheensaS.WilliamsR.MetcalfeA. (2013). Shattered schemata and fragmented identities: Men’s experiences of antenatal genetic screening in great Britain. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 1081-1103. doi:10.1177/0192513X13484274
12.
EislerI.EllisonM.FlinterF.GreyJ.HutchisonS.JacksonC.. . . UlphF. (2016). Developing an intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited genetic conditions and training genetic counsellors in its delivery. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24, 794-802. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.215
13.
EislerI.FlinterF.GreyJ.HutchisonS.JacksonC.LongworthL.. . . UlphF. (2017). Training genetic counsellors to deliver an innovative therapeutic intervention: Their views and experiences of facilitating multi-family discussion groups. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26, 199-214. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-0008-0
14.
FanosJ. H.DavisJ.PuckJ. M. (2001). Sib understanding of genetics and attitudes toward carrier testing for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 98, 46-56. doi:10.1002/1096-8628(20010101)98:1<46::AID-AJMG1008>3.0.CO;2-K
15.
FanosJ. H.PuckJ. M. (2001). Family pictures: Growing up with a brother with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 98, 57-63. doi:10.1002/1096-8628(20010101)98:1<57::AID-AJMG1007>3.0.CO;2-J
16.
FeethamS.L. (1999) The future in family nursing is genetics and it is now [Guest Editorial]Journal of Family Nursing, 5, 3-9. doi: 10.1177/107484079900500101
17.
Forrest KeenanK.van TeijlingenE.McKeeL.MiedzybrodzkaZ.impsonS. A. (2009). How young people find out about their family history of Huntington’s disease. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1892-1900. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.049
18.
GalloA. M.AngstD.KnaflK. A.HadleyE.SmithC. (2005). Parents sharing information with their children about genetic conditions. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19, 267-275. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.05.008
JamesC. A.HoltzmanN. A.HadleyD. W. (2003). Perceptions of reproductive risk and carrier testing among adolescent sisters of males with chronic granulomatous disease. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C, 119(1), 60-69. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.10007
22.
KenenR.Arden-JonesA.EelesR. (2004). We are talking but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a History of Breast/Ovarian Cancer (HBOC). Psycho-Oncology, 13, 335-345. doi:10.1002/pon.745
23.
KissaneD.BlochS.McKenzieM.McDowallA. C.NitzanR. (1998). Family grief therapy: A preliminary account of a new model to promote healthy family functioning during palliative care and bereavement. Psycho-Oncology, 7, 14-25. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199801/02)7:1<14::AID-PON313>3.0.CO;2-D
24.
LillieA. K.CliffordC.MetcalfeA. (2011). Caring for patients with a family history of cancer: Why concerns about genetic predisposition are missing from the palliative agenda. Palliative Medicine, 25, 117-124. doi:10.1177/0269216310383738
25.
McAllisterM.DaviesL.PayneK.NichollsS.DonnaiD.MacLeodR. (2007). The emotional effects of genetic diseases: Implications for clinical genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 143, 2651-2661. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32013
26.
McConkie-RosellA.SpiridigliozziG. A. (2004). “Family matters”: A conceptual framework for genetic testing in children. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 9-29. doi:10.1023/B:JOGC.0000013379.90587.ef
27.
MendesA.MetcalfeA.PanequeM.SousaL.ClarkeA. J.SequeirosJ. (2017). Communication of information about genetic risks: Putting families at the center. Fam Process. 2017 Jul 16. doi: 10.1111/famp.12306. [Epub ahead of print]
28.
MetcalfeA.CoadJ.PlumridgeG.GillP.FarndonP. (2008). Family communication between children and their parents about inherited genetic conditions: A meta-synthesis of the research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16, 1193-1200. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.84
29.
MetcalfeA.PlumridgeG.CoadJ.ShanksA.GillP. (2011). Parents’ and children’s communication about genetic risk: A qualitative study, learning from families’ experiences. European Journal Human Genetics, 9, 640-646. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.258
30.
MetcalfeA.PumphreyR.CliffordC. (2008). Children affected by genetic conditions in end-of-life care. Part 1: Development of a study. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 14, 596-601. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2008.14.12.32064
31.
MetcalfeA.PumphreyR.CliffordC. (2009). Children affected by genetic conditions in end-of-life care. Part 2: Findings and discussion. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 15, 22-28. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2009.15.1.37949
32.
MetcalfeA.PumphreyR.CliffordC. (2010). Hospice nurses and genetics: Implications for end-of-life care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 192-207. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02935.x
33.
MiesfeldtS.CohnW. F.JonesS. M.RopkaM. E.WeinsteinJ. C. (2003). Breast cancer survivors attitudes about communication of breast cancer risk to their children. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C, 119(1), 45-50. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.10012
34.
NereoN. E.FeeR. J.HintonV. J. (2003). Parental stress in mothers of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 473-484. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsg038
35.
PetersonS. K. (2005). The role of the family in genetic testing: Theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 627-639. doi:10.1177/1090198105278751
36.
PlumridgeG.MetcalfeA.CoadJ.GillP. (2010). Family communication about genetic risk information: Particular issues for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 152, 1225-1232. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33364
37.
PlumridgeG.MetcalfeA.CoadJ.GillP. (2011). Parents’ communication with siblings of children affected by an inherited genetic condition. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20, 374-383. doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9361-1
38.
PlumridgeG.MetcalfeA.CoadJ.GillP. (2012). The role of support groups in facilitating families in coping with a genetic condition and in discussion of genetic risk information. Health Expectations, 15, 255-266. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00663.x
39.
RollandJ. S. (2006). Genetics, family systems, and multicultural influences. Families, Systems, & Health, 24, 425-441. doi:10.1037/1091-7527.24.4.425
40.
RollandJ. S.WilliamsJ. K. (2005). Toward a biopsychosocial model for 21st-century genetics. Family Process, 44, 3-24. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00039.x
41.
RowlandE.MetcalfeA. (2013). Communicating inherited genetic risk between parent and child: A meta-thematic synthesis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 870-880. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.002
42.
SobelS.Brookes CowanC. (2003). Ambiguous loss and disenfranchised grief: The impact of DNA predictive testing on the family as a system. Family Process, 42, 47-57. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00047.x
43.
SobelS. K.Brookes CowanD. (2000). Impact of genetic testing for Huntington disease on the family system. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 90, 49-59. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000103)90:1<49::AID-AJMG10>3.0.CO;2-3
44.
TercyakK. P.HughesC.MainD.SnyderC.LynchJ. F.LynchH. T.LermanC. (2001). Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Patient Education & Counseling, 43, 213-224. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00122-1
45.
TercyakK. P.PeshkinB. N.StreisandR.LermanC. (2001). Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 336-346. doi:10.1002/pon.531
46.
TomarkenA.HollandJ.SchachterS.VanderwerkerL.ZuckermanE.NelsonC.. . . PrigersonH. (2008). Factors of complicated grief pre-death in caregivers of cancer patients. Psych-Oncology, 17, 105-111. doi:10.1002/pon.1188
47.
van OostromI.Meijers-HeijboerH.DuivenvoordenH. J.Bröcker-VriendsA. H.van AsperenC. J.SijmonsR. H.. . . TibbenA. (2007). Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: A prospective study. Clinical Genetics, 71, 35-42. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00731.x
48.
Van RiperM. (2006). Family nursing in the era of genomic health care: We should be doing so much more! [Guest Editorial]. Journal of Family Nursing, 12, 111-118. doi: 10.1177/107484070628727
49.
WaldbothV.PatchC.Mahrer-ImhofR.MetcalfeA. (2016). Living a normal life in an extraordinary way: A systematic review investigating experiences of families of young people’s transition into adulthood when affected by a genetic and chronic childhood condition. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, 44-59. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.007
50.
WilliamsR. A.DheensaS.MetcalfeA. (2011). Men’s involvement in antenatal screening: A qualitative pilot study using e-mail. Midwifery, 27, 861-866. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2010.09.004
