Science forms an integral part of our daily lives and plays an important role in democratic deliberation and decision making. One would expect this omnipresence of science to be reflected in television news programs in public broadcasting because of its responsibility to preserve the diversity and openness of the media. For this study, a representative sample of six Western European news programs was analyzed. The results show that science has a marginal presence and that “science news” is about technology or the natural sciences. In national, foreign, or economic news items, “embedded” scientists rarely comment on the issue at hand.
Adatto K. ( 1990). Sound bite democracy: Network evening news presidential campaign coverage, 1968 and 1988 (Research Paper R-2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John Slorenstein Bertone Center.
2.
Albæk, E., Munk Christiansen, P., & Togeby, L. ( 2003). Experts in the mass media: Researchers as sources in the Danish daily newspapers, 1961-2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 937-948.
3.
Altheide, D.L., & Snow, R.P. ( 1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Altheide, D.L., & Snow, R.P. ( 1991). Media worlds in the postjournalism era. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
5.
ARTE TV. (n.d.). Retrieved June 22, 2009, from http://www.arte.tv/de/alles-ueber/ARTE--The-Channel-_5Bengl-_5D/2197470.html/
6.
Bardoel, J., & Van Cuilenburg, J.J. (2003). Communicatiebeleid en communicatiemarkt [Communication policy and communication market]. Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever.
7.
Bauer, M., Ragnarsdottir, A., Rudolfsdottir, A., & Durant, J. ( 1995). Public perceptions of BSE and CJD risk in Europe. From science and technology in the British press, 1946-1990: A systematic content analysis of the press (Project report. Coding frame and sheet). Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/content/hcoding/hcindex.htm
8.
Bucchi, M., & Mazzolini, R.G. (2003). Big science, little news: News coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 7-24.
9.
Bucy, E.P., & Grabe, M.E. ( 2007). Taking television seriously: A sound and image bite analysis of presidential campaign coverage, 1992-2004. Journal of Communication , 57, 652-675.
10.
Cohen, J. ( 2002). Deliberation and democracy. In D. Estlund (Ed.), Democracy (pp. 87-106). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
Conrad, P. ( 1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8, 285-302.
12.
De Cheveigné, S. ( 2006). Science and technology on TV news. In J. Willems & W. Göpfert (Eds.), Science and the power of TV (pp. 85-100). Amsterdam : VU University Press.
13.
De Cheveigné, S., & Cheddadi, N. ( 1998, September 17-19). Science in European TV news. Paper presented at PCST-5 Conference "Science Without Frontiers,"Berlin, Germany.
14.
De Vreese, C., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. ( 2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication , 18, 107-122.
15.
Eide, M., & Ottoson, R. ( 1994). Science journalism without science journalists: Notes on a Norwegian media paradox. Public Understanding of Science , 3, 425-434.
16.
Entman, R.M. ( 1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication, 43, 51-57.
17.
European Commission. (2005). Social values, science and technology (Special Eurobarometer 225, Wave 63.1) . Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Research Directorate-General.
18.
European Commission. (2007). Scientific research in the media (Special Eurobaro meter 282, Wave 67.2). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Research Directorate-General .
19.
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M.H. ( 1965). The structure of foreign news. The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64-91.
20.
Gans, H.J. ( 2004). Deciding what’s news. A study of CBC evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1979)
21.
Golding, P., & Elliot, P. ( 1979). Making the news. London: Longman.
22.
Göpfert, W. ( 1996). Scheduled science: TV coverage of science, technology, medicine and social science and programming in Britain and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 361-374.
23.
Habermas, J. ( 2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411-426.
24.
Hagen, L.M. ( 1993). Opportune witnesses: An analysis of balance in the selection of sources and arguments in the leading German newspapers of the census issue . European Journal of Communication, 8, 317-343.
25.
Hagendijk, R.P. ( 1996). Wetenschap, constructivisme en cultuur [Science, constructivism and culture]. Amsterdam: Luna Negra .
26.
Hagendijk, R.P., & Meeus, J. ( 1993). Blind faith: fact, fiction and fraud in public controversy over science. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 391-415.
27.
Hallin, D.C. ( 1992). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968-1988 . Journal of Communication, 42, 6-24.
28.
Hallin, D.C., & Mancini, P. ( 2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics . New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Hargreaves, I., & Ferguson, G. ( 2001). Who’s misunderstanding whom? An inquiry into the relationship between science and the media. Swindon, UK: Economic & Social Research Council.
30.
Heinderyckx, F. ( 1993). Television news programmes in Western Europe: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication, 8, 425-450.
31.
Hilgartner, S. ( 2000). Science on stage. Expert advice as public drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
Kepplinger, H.M. ( 1995). Individual and institutional impacts upon press coverage of nuclear power and genetic engineering in Germany. In M. Bauer (Ed.), Resistance to new technology, nuclear power, information technology and biotechnology (pp. 357-379). London: Science Museum and Cambridge University Press .
33.
Leon, B. ( 2006). Science news as marginal topic. In J. Willems & W. Göpfert (Eds.), Science and the power of TV (pp. 101-114). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
34.
Leon, B. ( 2008). Science related information in European television: A study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science , 17, 443-460.
35.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Campanella Bracken, C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication. Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604.
36.
Maeseele, P., & Desmet, L. ( 2008). Hoe? Zo! Wetenschappen op televisie in Vlaanderen?! [How? So! Sciences on television in Flanders?!]. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap [Journal for Communication Sciences], 36, 187-203.
37.
McQuail, D. ( 2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory. London: Sage.
38.
Merton, R.K. ( 1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1942 )
39.
Nelkin, D. ( 1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology . New York: Freeman Press. (Original work published 1987)
40.
Nisbet, M.C., & Lewenstein, B.V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American media. The policy process and the elite press 1970 to 1999. Science Communication, 23, 359-391.
41.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. ( 2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
42.
Page, B.I. ( 1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Peters, H.P. ( 1995). The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: Co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture and Society, 17, 31-48.
44.
Peters, H.P. ( 2002). Scientists as "public experts." Tijdschrift voor Wetenschap , Technologie en Samenleving [Journal for Science, Technology and Society], 10, 39-42.
45.
Preston, P. ( 2009). New news nets: Media routines in a "knowledge society." In P. Preston (Ed.), Making the news (pp. 49-71). London: Routledge .
46.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F.G. ( 2005). Analyzing media messages. Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Schönbach, K. ( 1997). Das hyperaktive Publikum. Essay über eine Illusion [The hyper active public. Essay on an illusion]. Publizistiek , 42, 279-286.
48.
Schulz, W. ( 1976). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien [The construction of reality in news media]. Freiburg (Breisgau)/Munchen, Germany: Alber.
49.
Schulz, W. ( 1982). News structure and people’s awareness of political events. Gazette, 30, 139-153.
50.
Segun, E. ( 2003). The BSE saga: A cannibalistic tale. Science as Culture, 12, 3-22.
51.
Semetko, H., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93-109.
52.
Staab, J.F. ( 1990). The role of news factors in news selection: A theoretical reconsideration. European Journal of Communication, 5, 423-443.
53.
van Trigt, A.M. ( 1995). Making news about Medicine. Enschede, Netherlands: Febo Druk Design.
54.
Tuchman, G. ( 1979). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
55.
Verhoeven, P. ( 2005). Stuivertje-wisselen. Over de plaats van wetenschap en journalistiek in medische televisieprogramma’s in Nederland tussen 1961 en 2000. [Trading places. The place of science and journalism in medical television programmes in the Netherlands between 1961 and 2000] . Amsterdam: UAE.
56.
Verhoeven, P. ( 2006). The mediazation of science. Changes in medical programs on television. In J. Willems & W. Göpfert (Eds.), Science and the power of TV (pp. 29-40). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
57.
Verhoeven, P. ( 2008). Where has the doctor gone? The mediazation of medicine on Dutch television, 1961-2000. Public Understanding of Science , 17, 461-472.
58.
Verhoeven, P., & Lops, B. ( 2008). Sleutelen aan wetenschap op televisie. Een kleine geschiedenis van wetenschap op de Nederlandse televisie aan de hand van AVRO’s Vinger aan de Pols en VPRO’s Noorderlicht [Fiddling with science on television. A short history of science on Dutch Public television: the case of medical and science journalism]. Tijdschrift voor Mediageschiedenis [ Journal for Media History], 11, 109-131.
59.
Wallman, S. ( 1998). Ordinary women and shapes of knowledge: perspectives on the controversy STD and AIDS. Public Understanding of Science , 7, 169-185.
60.
Weigold, M. ( 2001). Communicating science. Science Communication , 23, 164-193.
61.
Wester, F., Pleijter, A., & Hijmans, E. ( 2002). Onderzoek in de krant [Research in the newspaper]. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap [Journal for Communication Science], 30, 55-75.
62.
Willems, J., Bos, M., & Van den Auweraert, A. (2006). PCST on television: A social service or risky business? In J. Willems & W. Göpfert (Eds.), Science and the power of TV (pp. 13-28). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
