The approach to the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is under constant revision with advances in technology, noninvasive approaches, and increasing awareness of the risks of ionizing radiation. Optimal approaches in some categories of patients are controversial. Data are insufficient for evidence-based recommendations. Therefore, this survey of investigators in the field was undertaken. Even among experts there were marked differences of opinion regarding the approach to the diagnosis of acute PE. Although CT pulmonary angiography was usually the imaging test of choice, the respondents were keenly aware of the dangers of ionizing radiation. In view of advances in scintigraphic diagnosis since the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) trial, ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scans or perfusion scans alone and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) V/Q lung scans are often recommended. The choice depends on the patient’s age, gender, and complexity of the findings on the plain chest radiograph.
Stein PDFowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism . N Eng J Med. 2006; 354(22):2317-2327.
2.
Goodman LR, Stein PD, Matta F., et al. CT Venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: data from PIOPED II. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(5):1071-1076.
3.
Goodman LR, Stein PD, Beemath A., et al. CT venography: continuous helical images versus reformatted discontinuous images using PIOPED II data. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2007; 189(2):409-412.
4.
Begemann PG, Bonacker M., Kemper J., et al. Evaluation of the deep venous system in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with multi-detector CT: a prospective study in comparison to Doppler sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27(3): 399-409.
5.
Stein PD, Matta F., Yaekoub AY, et al. CT venous phase venography with 64-slice CT angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost.2010;16(4): 422-429.
6.
Bhargavan M. , Sunshine JH, Lewis RSFrequency of use of imaging tests in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: effects of physician specialty, patient characteristics, and region. AJR Am J Roentgenol.2010;194(4):1018-1026.
7.
A Collaborative Study by the PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation-perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263(20):2753-2759.
8.
Gottschalk A. , Sostman HD, Coleman RE, et al. Ventilationperfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(7):1119-1126.
9.
Miniati M., Pistolesi M., Marini C., et al. Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 154(5):1387-1393.
10.
Stein PD, Gottschalk A.Review of criteria appropriate for a very low probability of pulmonary embolism on ventilation-perfusion lung scans: a position paper. Radiographics . 2000;20(1):99-105.
11.
Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A.Mismatched vascular defects: an easy alternative to mismatched segmental equivalent defects for the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104(5):1468-1471.
12.
Stein PD, Gottschalk A., Henry JW, Shivkumar K.Stratification of patients according to prior cardiopulmonary disease and probability assessment based on the number of mismatched segmental equivalent perfusion defects. Approaches to strengthen the diagnostic value of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104(5):1461-1467.
13.
Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A.The addition of clinical assessment to stratification according to prior cardiopulmonary disease further optimizes the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993 ;104(5):1472-1476.
14.
Bajc M., Neilly JB, Miniati M., Schuemichen C., Meignan M., Jonson B.EANM Committee. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.2009;36(8):1356-1370.
15.
Bajc M., Neilly JB, Miniati M., Schuemichen C., Meignan M., Jonson B.EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 ;36(9):1528-1538.
16.
Sostman HD, Miniati M., Gottschalk A., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1741-1748.
17.
Stein PD, Freeman LM, Sostman HD, et al. SPECT in acute pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med . 2009;50(12):1999-2007.
18.
Leblanc M., Leveill’ee F., Turcotte E.Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using 99mTc-Technegas. Nucl Med Commun. 2007 ;28(8):667-672.
19.
De Geeter FWTomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: still, we do not know. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(12): 2119-2120.
20.
Reid JH, Coche EE, Inoue T., et al, International Atomic Energy Agency Consultants’ Group. Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(3):505-521.
21.
Bajc M., Olsson CG, Olsson B., Palmer J., Jonson B.Diagnostic evaluation of planar and tomographic ventilation/perfusion lung images in patients with suspected pulmonary emboli. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004;24(5):249-256.
22.
Bajc M., Olsson B., Palmer J., Jonson B.Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. J Intern Med. 2008;264(4):379-387.
23.
13. Stein PD , Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, et al. Gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for acute pulmonary embolism: results of the PIOPED III Trial . Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(7):434-443.
24.
Kanal E., Barkovich AJ, Bell C., et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1-27.
25.
Chrysochou C. , Power A., Shurrab AE, et al. Low risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in nondialysis patients who have chronic kidney disease and are investigated with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging . Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2010; 5(3):484-489.
26.
Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, et al. Noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1994:154(3): 289-297.
27.
Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M., et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):98-107.
28.
Johnson SA, Stevens SM, Woller SC, et al. Risk of deep vein thrombosis following a single negative whole-leg compression ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;303(5):438-445.
29.
Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, et al. Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: Recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators. Am J Med. 2006;119(12):1048-1055.
30.
Perrier A., Roy PM, Aujesky D., et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med. 2004 ;116(5):291-299.
31.
Turkstra F. , Kuijer PM, van Beek EJ, et al. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(10):775-781.
32.
Schaefer-Prokop C., Prokop M.CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy. Eur Radiol. 2008 ; 18(12):2705-2708.
33.
Milne ENC.Female breast radiation exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6):E24.
34.
Magnevist. Wayne, NJ: Berlex Laboratories. Published Nov, 2002.
35.
Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T., Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation . Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(3):871-876.
36.
Cook JV, Kyriou J.Radiation from CT and perfusion scanning in pregnancy. BMJ . 2005;331(7512):350.
37.
Scarsbrook AF, Evans AL, Owen AR, Gleeson FVDiagnosis of suspected venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy. Clin Radiol. 2006;61(1):1-12.
Chunilal SD , Bates SMVenous thromboembolism in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and prevention. Thromb Haemost.2009; 101(3):428-438.
40.
Valentin J.Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus): ICRP Publication 90. Ann ICRP. 2003;33(1-2):1-206.
41.
Schembri GP , Miller A., Smart RCRadiation dosimetry and safety issues in the investigation of pulmonary embolism. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40(6):442-454.
42.
Jha S., Ho A., Bhargavan M., Owen JB, Sunshine JHImaging evaluation for suspected pulmonary embolism: what do emergency physicians and radiologists say?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):W38-W43.
U-King-Im JM, Freeman SJ, Boylan T., Cheow HKQuality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2709-2715.
45.
Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MAFemale breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1228-1233.
46.
International Commission on Radiological Protection.ICRP Publication 87: managing patient dose in computed tomography, 87. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(4):1-45.
47.
Campbell J. , Kalra MK, Rizzo S., et al. Scanning Beyond Anatomic Limits of the Thorax in Chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(6):1525-1530.
48.
Matsuoka S. , Hunsaker AR, Gill RR, et al. Vascular enhancement and image quality of MDCT pulmonary angiography in 400 cases: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings. AJR Am J Roentgeno . l. 2009;192(6):1651-1656.
49.
Yilmaz Mhmd , Albayram SMD, Yasar DP, et al. Female Breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31(1): 138-142.
50.
Stein EG, Haramati LB, Bellin E., et al. Radiation exposure from medical imaging in patients with chronic and recurrent conditions. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(5):351-359.
51.
Kline JA, Courtney DM, Beam DM, et al. Incidence and predictors of repeated computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med . 2009;54(1): 41-48.
52.
Sodickson A. , Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults . Radiology. 2009;251(1):175-184.
53.
Stein PD, Alavi A., Gottschalk A., et al. Usefulness of non-invasive diagnostic tools for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a normal chest radiograph. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 67(13):1117-1120.
54.
Forbes KP, Reid JH, Murchison JTDo preliminary chest X-ray findings define the optimum role of pulmonary scintigraphy in suspected pulmonary embolism? Clin Radiol . 2001;56(5): 397-400.
55.
Le Gal G., Bounameaux H.Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patients . J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(8):1244-1246.
56.
Einstein AJ , Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S.Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography . JAMA. 2007;298(3): 317-323.
57.
Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP. 1998;28(3):1-126.
