Abstract
This article addresses the following important questions regarding differentiation: What does it mean? What does it include? How is it implemented? Who receives differentiated experiences? Why does differentiation appear to be associated dominantly with gifted education? The author describes an introductory course of study that details objectives and experiences for gifted students who have been newly identified or who are continuing members of the gifted population.
“Facilitating gifted students’ understanding of the meaning of differentiation has the potential to enhance their involvement in differentiated experiences . . .”
Controversy regarding differentiation has been an integral component of gifted education. What does it mean? What does it include? How is it implemented? Who receives differentiated experiences? Why does differentiation appear to be associated dominantly with gifted education? These are among the prevalent questions that educators consistently attempt to answer with theories, curricular examples and models, professional learning opportunities, and personal experiences.
National, state, and district edicts; schools’ decisions; teachers’ practices; parents’ conversations; and gifted students’ queries have attempted to define, develop, demonstrate, and defend differentiation as a practice and obligation related to the identification and education of gifted students. The concept and implementation of differentiation is continually molded by contemporary political, social, economic, and educational factors. It is acknowledged that differentiation has been aligned with concepts of “privilege” and “priority” and has been perceived as a reward rather than an essential feature of the teaching and learning experience for gifted students. Other erroneous interpretations of the concept of differentiation appear to evolve from the gifted students’ own misinterpretations of the very process in which they have been engaged. “Because I am gifted” is an insufficient response to both peers and adults as to why a gifted student is involved in a differentiated curricular experience. A significant method to resolve the misunderstandings related to the why, what, and how of differentiation would be to directly address differentiation in a manner that specifically clarifies its definition and implementation to the gifted students for whom it is intended.
An Introduction to Differentiation: A Prerequisite Study
The concept of creating and offering an introductory session or “course of study” that focuses on the fundamental objectives, dimensions, and implementation of “differentiation” is suggested. This “course of study” would be provided as a prerequisite to gifted students’ actual engagement in differentiated curriculum experiences and can be provided to them within a classroom setting, school, or district programmatic structure. The “course of study” would include the following objectives and experiences for gifted students who have been newly identified or who are continuing members of the gifted population. The deliberately planned interactions among novice and experienced gifted students provide the opportunity for dialogue and exchanging of personally related questions and answers. This experience also potentially clarifies and underscores the academic, social, and emotional needs of gifted students to participate in differentiated learning experiences with both the efficacy of the meaning and the integrity to define differentiated experiences in relationship to the concept of “intellectual equity.” Facilitating gifted students’ understanding of the meaning of differentiation has the potential to enhance their involvement in differentiated experiences and to eradicate some of the speculation about gifted services.
The following components (see Table 1) are suggested to be included in the “study of differentiation” as a means to ameliorate the misconceptions that often surround the concept and implementation of differentiation to gifted students.
Outline for the Study of Differentiation
At the conclusion of the course, students should be able to address important questions related to the meaning of differentiation, what it includes, how it is implemented, and who is included.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Bio
Sandra N. Kaplan, EdD, is a clinical professor at the University of Southern California and past-president of the National Association for Gifted Children. She may be reached at University of Southern California, Rossier School of Education, Waite Phillips Hall 1002C, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
