AlexanderW.M.GeorgeP.S. (1981). The exemplary middle school (pp. 141–171). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
2.
BurnsR.B. (1987). Steering groups, leveling effects, and instructional paceAmerican Journal of Education, 96 (1), 24–55.
3.
FeldhusenJ.F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youthEducational Leadership, 46 (6), 6–11.
4.
FrasierM.M. (1989). Poor and minority students can be gifted, too!Educational Leadership, 46 (6), 16–18.
5.
GoodladJ.I.OakesJ. (1988). We must offer equal access to knowledgeEducational Leadership, 45 (5), 16–22.
6.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonR.T. (1989, April). What to say to parents of gifted students. The Cooperative Link.
7.
KulikC.C.KulikJ.A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findingsAmerican Education Research Journal. 19 (3), 415–428.
8.
KulikC.C.KulikJ.A. (1984). Synthesis of research on effects of accelerated instructionEducational Leadership, 42 (2), 84–89.
9.
KulikC.C.KulikJ.A. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievementEquity and Excellence, 23 (1–2), 22–30.
10.
KulikJ.A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented..
11.
MerenbloomE.Y. (1986). The team process in the middle school: A handbook for teachers, (pp. 86–93). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
12.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track Part I: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
13.
OakesJ. (1986a). Keeping track, Part I: The policy and practice of curriculum inequalityPhi Delta Kappan, 68 (1), 12–17.
14.
OakesJ. (1986b). Keeping track, part II: Curriculum inequality and school reformPhi Delta Kappan, 68 (2), 148–154.
15.
OakesJ. (1990, August). Beyond tracking: Making the best for schools. Presented at NCPEA Conference, California State University, Los Angeles.
16.
RenzulliJ.S.ReisS.M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press..
17.
RimmS.B. (1987 November/December). Why do bright children underachieve?Gifted Child Today, 10 (6), 30–36.
18.
RobinsonA. (1990a). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented studentsJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 (1), 9–27.
19.
RobinsonA. (1990b) Response to Slavin: Cooperation, consistency, and challenge for academically talented youthJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 (1), 31–36.
20.
RogersK.B. (1986, January). Review of research on the education of intellectually and academically gifted students. St. Paul, MN: Department of Education.
21.
RogersK.B. (1992). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of intellectually and academically gifted students. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Education.
SlavinR.E. (1986, June). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, The Johns Hopkins University.
24.
SlavinR.E. (1988). Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schoolsEducational Leadership, 46 (1), 67–75.
25.
SlavinR.E. (1990a). Ability grouping, coooperative learning and the giftedJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 (1), 3–8.
26.
SlavinR.E. (1990b). Response to Robinson: Cooperative learning and the gifted: Who benefits?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14 (1), 28–30.
27.
VonnegutK.Jr. (1961). Harrison Bergeron. First published in Fantasy and Science Fiction Magazine. Found in Vonnegut, K. Jr. (1968). Welcome to the monkey house, (pp. 7–13). New York: Delacourte Press, A Seymour Lawrence Book..
28.
WallachA. (1987, May/June). A second look at keeping track. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 16 (3), 34–37.
29.
WallachA. (1989). A misleading look at groupingEducational Leadership, 46 (6), 92.
30.
WebbN. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groupsInternational Journal of Educational Research, 13 (1), 21–39.