BuescherT. M. (1985). A framework for understanding the social and emotional development of gifted and talented adolescentsRoeper Review, 8, 10–15.
2.
BuescherT. M.OlszewskiP.HighamS. J. (1987, April). Influences on strategies adolescents use to cope with their own recognized talents. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings, Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288 285).
3.
ColemanL. J. (1985). Schooling the gifted. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41–56.
5.
ColemanL. J.SandersM. D. (1993). Understanding the needs of gifted students: Social needs, social choices and masking one's giftednessThe Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 22–25.
6.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J.StewartR. A. (1993). The social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigmRoeper Review, 16, 37–40.
7.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J.Terhaar-YonkersM. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftednessJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44–55.
8.
DelisleJ. R. (1984). Gifted children speak out. New York: Walker and Company.
9.
EriksonE. H. (1965). Identity versus identity diffusion In MussenP. H.CongerJ. J.KaganJ. (Eds.), Readings in child development and personality (pp. 435–441). New York: Harper & Row.
10.
GrossM. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youthRoeper Review, 11, 189–194.
11.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children In HorowitzF. D.O'BrienM. (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 149–195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
KulikJ. A.KulikL. C. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178–196). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
KwanP. C. F. (1992). On a pedestal: Effects of intellectual-giftedness and some implications for programme planningEducational Psychology, 12, 37–62.
16.
Manor-BullockR.LookC.DixonD. N. (1995). Is giftedness socially stigmatizing? The impact of high achievement on social interactionsJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 319–338.
17.
RimmS. B. (1988). Popularity ends at grade 12!Gifted Child Today, 11, 42–44.
18.
SilvermanL. K. (Ed.). (1993a). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love..
19.
SilvermanL. K. (1993b). Social development, leadership, and gender issues In SilvermanL. K. (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 291–327). Denver, CO: Love.
20.
SlavinR. E. (1991). Are cooperative learning and “untracking” harmful to the gifted? Response to AllanEducational Leadership, 48 (6), 68–71.
21.
SlavinR. E. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternativesElementary School Journal, 93, 535–552.
22.
SwiatekM. A. (1995). An empirical investigation of the social coping strategies used by gifted adolescents. Giftedness in the social context [Special issue]Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 154–161.
23.
SwiatekM. A.DorrR. M. (1996). Social coping strategies used by gifted adolescents: A replication of an empirical study. Unpublished manuscript.
24.
TannenbaumA. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27–44). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
ZiglerE.FarberE. A. (1985). Commonalities between the intellectual extremes: Giftedness and mental retardation In HorowitzF. D.O'BrienM. (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.