A numerical and experimental implementation and integration of Steiglitz–McBride algorithm with the frequency domain IIR filtering technique for active vibration control

Abstract

In adaptive control applications for noise and vibration, finite ımpulse response (FIR) or ınfinite ımpulse response (IIR) filter structures are used for online adaptation of the controller parameters. IIR filters offer the advantage of representing dynamics of the controller with smaller number of filter parameters than with FIR filters. However, the possibility of instability and convergence to suboptimal solutions are the main drawbacks of such controllers. An IIR filtering-based Steiglitz–McBride (SM) algorithm offers nearly-optimal solutions. However, real-time implementation of the SM algorithm has never been explored and application of the algorithm is limited to numerical studies for active vibration control. Furthermore, the prefiltering procedure of the SM increases the computational complexity of the algorithm in comparison to other IIR filtering-based algorithms. Based on the lack of studies about the SM in the literature, an SM time-domain algorithm for AVC was implemented both numerically and experimentally in this study. A methodology that integrates frequency domain IIR filtering techniques with the classic SM time-domain algorithm is proposed to decrease the computational complexity. Results of the proposed approach are compared with the classical SM algorithm. Both SM and the proposed approach offer multimodal vibration suppression and it is possible to predict the performance of the controller via simulations. The proposed hybrid approach ensures similar vibration suppression performance compared to the classical SM and offers computational advantage as the number of control filter parameters increases.

Keywords

Adaptive control IIR filtering Steiglitz–McBride Algorithm frequency domain adaptive filtering hybrid form of IIR filtering active vibration control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aridogan

Basdogan

Erturk

(2014) Analytical modeling and experimental validation of a structurally integrated piezoelectric energy harvester on a thin plate. Smart Materials and Structures 23: 045039.

Boz

Aridogan

Basdogan

(2015) A numerical and experimental study of optimal velocity feedback control for vibration suppression of a plate-like structure. Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control 34: 343–360.

Boz

Kulah

Aridogan

et al. (2011) Analog velocity feedback controller for vibration suppression and sound attenuation. ASME Conference Proceedings 2011: 207–214.

Chellabi

Stepanenko

Dost

(2009) Direct optimal vibration control of a piezoelastic plate. Journal of Vibration and Control 15: 1093–1118.

Das

Moreau

Cazzolato

(2013) A computationally efficient frequency-domain filtered-X LMS algorithm for virtual microphone. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 37: 440–454.

Diniz

PSR

(2008) Adaptive Filtering: Algorithms and Practical Implementation, Springer.

Duan

Lim

et al. (2014) Combined feedforward-feedback active control of road noise inside a vehicle cabin. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 136(4): 041020.

Fan

Yang

(1990) Analysis of a frequency-domain adaptive IIR filter. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 38: 864–870.

Gontijo WA, Tobias OJ, Seara R, et al. (2006) FxLMS algorithm with variable step size and variable leakage factor for active vibration control. In: 2006 international telecommunications symposium, Fortaleza, Brasil, 3–6 September 2006, pp.572–575.

10.

Hansen

(2013) Active Control of Noise and Vibration, CRC Press.

11.

Huang

Xiao

Sun

et al. (2013) A variable step-size FXLMS algorithm for narrowband active noise control. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 21: 301–312.

12.

Jackson

(2008) Frequency-domain Steiglitz–McBride method for least-squares IIR filter design, ARMA modeling, and periodogram smoothing. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 15: 49–52.

13.

Johnson

Jr Larimore

Feintuch

et al. (1977) Comments on and additions to “An adaptive recursive LMS filter”. Proceedings of the IEEE 65: 1399–1402.

14.

Kuo

Morgan

(1996) Active Noise Control Systems: Algorithms and DSP Implementations, Wiley.

15.

Qiu

et al. (2011) Piezoelectric vibration control for all-clamped panel using DOB-based optimal control. Mechatronics 21: 1213–1221.

16.

Nowak

Van Veen

(1997) A constrained transform domain adaptive IIR filter structure for active noise control. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 5: 334–347.

17.

Rafaely

Elliot

(2000) A computationally efficient frequency-domain LMS algorithm with constraints on the adaptive filter. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 48: 1649–1655.

18.

Shynk

(1992) Frequency-domain and multirate adaptive filtering. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 9: 14–37.

19.

Shynk JJ, Gooch RP and Widrow B (1985) A frequency-domain adaptive pole-zero filter with applications. In: Nineteeth Asilomar conference on circuits, systems and computers, Location?, Date? 1985, pp.299-303.

20.

Steiglitz

McBride

(1965) A technique for the identification of linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 10: 461–464.

21.

Stoica

Soderstrom

(1981) The Steiglitz–McBride identification algorithm revisited: convergence analysis and accuracy aspects. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26: 712–717.

22.

Sun

Meng

(2004) Steiglitz–Mcbride type adaptive IIR algorithm for active noise control. Journal of Sound and Vibration 273: 441–450.

23.

Tang

Lee

(2012) Time–frequency-domain filtered-x LMS algorithm for active noise control. Journal of Sound and Vibration 331: 5002–5011.

24.

Qiu

Guo

(2014) A simplified adaptive feedback active noise control system. Applied Acoustics 81: 40–46.

25.

Yang

Huang

Han

et al. (2010) Adaptive inverse control of random vibration based on the filtered-X LMS algorithm. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 9: 141–146.