Proportional-derivative (PD) and proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers are popular control algorithms in industrial applications, especially in structural vibration control. In this paper, the designs of two dampers, namely the horizontal actuator and torsional actuator, are combined for the lateral and torsional vibrations of the structure. The standard PD and PID controllers are utilized for active vibration control. The sufficient conditions for asymptotic stability of these controllers are validated by utilizing the Lyapunov stability theorem. An active vibration control system with two floors equipped with a horizontal actuator and a torsional actuator is installed to carry out the experimental analysis. The experimental results show that bidirectional active control has been achieved.
AlavinasabAMoharramiHKhajepourA (2006) Active control of structures using energy-based LQR method. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering21(8): 605–18.
2.
BalendraTWangCMYanN (2001) Control of wind-excited towers by active tuned liquid column damper. Engineering Structures23(9): 1054–1067.
3.
CastaldoPRipaniM (2016) Optimal design of friction pendulum system properties for isolated structures considering different soil conditions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering90: 74–87.
4.
CastaldoPTubaldiE (2015) Influence of FPS-bearing properties on the seismic performance of base-isolated structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics44(15): 2817–2836.
5.
CastaldoPAmendolaGPalazzoB (2017) Seismic fragility and reliability of systems isolated by friction pendulum device: seismic reliability-based design (SRBD). Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics46(3): 425–446.
6.
CastaldoPPalazzoBDella VecchiaP (2015) Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings. Engineering Structures95: 80–93.
7.
CastaldoPPalazzoBDella VecchiaP (2016) Life cycle-cost and seismic reliability analysis of 3D systems equipped with FPS for different isolation degrees. Engineering Structures125: 349–363.
8.
ChangCC (1999) Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control. Engineering Structures21(5): 454–463.
9.
ChangJCHSoongTT (1980) Structural control using active tuned mass damper. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division106(6): 1091–1098.
10.
Chopra AK (2011) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. 4th edn. Prentice-Hall International Series.
11.
De Cock K, De Moor B, Minten W, et al. (1997) A tutorial on PID control. Report ESAT-SISTA/TR. Leuven, Belgium: Department of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
12.
De Iuliis M and Castaldo P (2012) An energy-based approach to the seismic control of one-way asymmetrical structural systems using semi-active devices. Ingegneria Sismica I 2012 (4): 31–42.
13.
DuHZhangN (2008) H∞ control for buildings with time delay in control via linear matrix inequalities and genetic algorithms. Engineering Structures30(1): 81–92.
14.
GoelRK (1997) Seismic response of asymmetric systems: energy-based approach. Journal of Structural Engineering123(11): 1444–1453.
15.
GucluRYaziciH (2008) Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers. Journal of Sound and Vibration318(1–2): 36–49.
16.
HitchcockPAKwokKCSWatkinsRDet al. (1997) Characteristics of liquid column vibration absorbers (LCVA). I. Engineering Structures19(2): 126–134.
17.
HoCCMaCK (2007) Active vibration control of structural systems by a combination of the linear quadratic Gaussian and input estimation approaches. Journal of Sound and Vibration301(3–5): 429–449.
18.
Hochrainer MJ, Adam C and Ziegler F (2000) Application of tuned liquid column dampers for passive structural control. In: 7th international congress on sound and vibration (ICSV 7), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 4–7 July 2000, pp.3107–3114.
19.
HousnerGWBergmanLACaugheyTKet al. (1997) Structural control: present and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics123(9): 897–971.
20.
IkhouaneaFMañosaaVRodellaraJ (2007) Dynamic properties of the hysteretic Bouc–Wen model. Systems and Control Letters56(3): 197–205.
21.
LeeCSHongHP (2010) Statistics of inelastic responses of hysteretic systems under bidirectional seismic excitations. Engineering Structures32(8): 2086–2074.
22.
Lewis FL, Dawson DM and Abdallah CT (2004) Robot Manipulator Control: Theory and Practice. 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc.
23.
LinCCChangCWangJF (2010) Active control of irregular buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering30(3): 98–109.
24.
LinJLTsaiKC (2008) Seismic analysis of two-way asymmetric building systems under bi-directional seismic ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics37(2): 305–328.
25.
NigdeliSM (2014) Effect of feedback on PID controlled active structures under earthquake excitations. Earthquakes and Structures6(2): 217–235.
26.
NigdeliSMBodurogluMH (2013) Active tendon control of torsionally irregular structures under near-fault ground motion excitation. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering28(9): 718–736.
27.
ParkWParkKSKohHM (2008) Active control of large structures using a bilinear pole-shifting transform with H∞ control method. Engineering Structures30(11): 3336–3344.
28.
Paul S, Yu W and Li X (2015) Recent advances in bidirectional modeling and structural control. Shock and Vibration Epub ahead of print 28 December 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6275307.
29.
RoldánCCampaFJAltuzarraOet al. (2014) Automatic identification of the inertia and friction of an electromechanical actuator. Mechanisms and Machine Science17: 409–416.
30.
Saiful IslamABMHussainRRJameelMet al. (2012) Non-linear time domain analysis of base isolated multi-storey building under site specific bi-directional seismic loading. Automation in Construction22: 554–566.
31.
Saragih R (2010) Designing active vibration control with minimum order for flexible structures. In: IEEE international conference on control and automation, Xiamen, China, 9–11 June 2010, pp.450–453.
32.
Seto K (1996) A structural control method of the vibration of flexible buildings in response to large earthquake and strong winds. In: Proceedings of the 35th IEEE conference on decision and control, Vol. 1, 13 December 1996, pp.658–663. IEEE.
33.
SontagEDWangY (1995) On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property. Systems and Control Letters24(5): 351–359.
34.
SoongTTSpencerBFJr (2002) Supplemental energy dissipation: state of the art and state of the practice. Engineering Structures24(3): 243–259.
35.
SpencerBFNagarajaiahS (2003) State of the art of structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering129(7): 845–856.
36.
ThenozhiSYuW (2013) Advances in modeling and vibration control of building structures. Annual Reviews in Control37(2): 346–364.
37.
ThenozhiSYuW (2014) Stability analysis of active vibration control of building structures using PD/PID control. Engineering Structures81(7): 208–218.
38.
YanGZhouLL (2006) Integrated fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms for multiobjective control of structures using MR dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration296(1–2): 368–382.
39.
Yanik A, Pinelli JP and Gutierrez H (2013) Control of a three-dimensional structure with magneto-rheological dampers. In: 11th international conference on vibration problems, Lisbon, Portugal, 9–12 September 2013.
40.
YaoJTP (1972) Concept of structural control. Journal of the Structural Division98(7): 1567–1574.
