Free vibrations of spatial frame structures: Analytical modelling and solution

Abstract

This study analytically handles the three-dimensional free vibrations of spatial frames using the initial values method, considering the axial and shear deformations alongside rotary inertias, namely, torsional, in-plane bending and out-of-plane bending. To handle the spatial geometry, the direction cosine matrices are used. Validation is performed with three cases in total, one case available in the literature alongside two numerical examples that are solved analytically and compared to the finite element models. Excellent agreements are found between the analytical results and the results in the literature, as well as those obtained from the finite element models.

Keywords

3D Timoshenko frame analytical solution direction cosine initial value method modal analysis

1. Introduction

Beams, with various geometric and material characteristics, are one of the most common load-carrying members that are used in many engineering structures such as shafts of rotating machinery, turbine blades, vehicle chassis, buildings, marine structures, etc. (Chaker and Cherifati, 1999; Chen and Zhu, 2021; Ibrahim et al., 1996; Tüfekci et al., 2020a, 2020b; Tuzzi et al., 2020; Woo, 1986; Yucel et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2016). Beams usually have predictable mechanical characteristics due to their geometric simplicity, which allows certain assumptions to be made. These assumptions typically depend on many parameters like the deformations the beam undergoes, cross-sectional properties of the beam as well as the geometry of the beam axis (Eroglu and Tufekci, 2017; Freund and Karakoç, 2016; Tüfekçi and Arpaci, 1998; Tüfekci et al., 2020a). Therefore, the assumptions must be made carefully considering the properties of the beam. Correctly made assumptions simplify the mathematical expressions, significantly reducing the need for intensive computational resources without introducing much inaccuracy.

Tailoring the mechanics of a particular structure to meet the operational requirements is the primary purpose of the design process. To build stiffer structures or to meet the design criteria, one can tune the material properties, which can be done by employing functionally graded materials. Thus, members made of functionally graded materials are found quite useful (Al-Furjan et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2021; Van Vinh and Tounsi, 2022). Apart from the materials, geometry is also another useful design parameter. To this extent, beams are mounted together, and these structures are called frames (Ansell, 2005; Antes et al., 2004; Lin and Ro, 2003; Lin and Wu, 2005; Mead, 2002; Moon and Choi, 2000; Ovunc, 1974; Rafezy et al., 2007). The most recent example of these structures in mechanical engineering can be given as three-dimensional load-carrying systems in aerospace structures that require lightweight and stiffness simultaneously (Kaiser et al., 2017; Wallner et al., 2010; Zbrowski, 2014). As assemblies of multiple beams, frame structures display similar behaviour to the beams but with a more complex nature. The complexity is, of course, caused by the interaction of the axial-flexural-torsional deformations of individual beams belonging to the frame structure (Ng and Kuang, 2000; Yucel et al., 2014). Alongside these couplings, preloading is a common issue with the frame structures. These beam structures can be mounted together so that the structure remains loaded without the effects of gravity or any other external factor, which clearly influences the dynamics of the frame (Howson and Williams, 1973; Mead, 2002). Also, nonstationary loads can be applied to the system that requires detailed investigations (Chen et al., 2019; Sophianopoulos and Kounadis, 1989).

Most studies handle frames' vibrations by employing various numerical methods. The finite element method (FEM) is among the most prominent numerical methods. Taking advantage of its standardised workflow and flexibility, this scheme can serve decently for even the most complicated structures. Nikolakopoulos et al. (1997) develop a finite element for determining crack location and depth in planar frame structures. Chen and Wu (1995) develop the finite element-based strip wavelet element method, which enables one investigation of the vibrations of frame structures with better precision. Pham et al. (2020) study the vibrations of functionally graded frame structures with semi-rigid joints and uncertainties. Massumi and Absalan (2013) present a numerical study handling planar frames with moment-resisting joints. Basci et al. (1979) formulate a finite element for more precise modelling of the vibrations using displacement functions obtained from the exact solution. Ranjbaran (2014) explores the effect of stiffening members on the vibrations of frame structures. Li et al. (2022) investigate the dynamic behaviour of a solar greenhouse modelled as a three-dimensional frame structure subjected to wind loads. Lumped mass properties, often employed to represent complicated mechanical systems, simplify the problems with frame dynamics (Rezaiee-Pajand and Khajavi, 2011). In contrast, consideration of continuous mass properties improves the accuracy and the representation capabilities of the model significantly (Ovunc, 1974). Apart from FEM, there are other numerical methods, such as the differential quadrature method (Al-Furjan et al., 2021, 2022; Cuong-Le et al., 2022; Fatahi et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2004).

Furthermore, Ibrahim et al. (1996) investigate the influence of the frame stiffness on the vibrations of frame structures that are used to construct trucks. Chan and Ho (1994) model the hinges in steel frame structures as semi-rigid and perform linear and nonlinear vibration analyses of these structures. Minghini et al. (2010) study the vibrations of fibre-reinforced polymer planar and spatial framework structures with the same joint properties. Kamgar and Saadatpour (2012) present a method to calculate the first natural frequency of a complicated system in which frames are involved.

Even though vibrations of frame structures can be effectively analysed by utilising finite element analysis, it should be emphasised that analytical approaches can be more effective, especially in the investigation of certain parameters that can affect the dynamic behaviour of the structure. It is observed that there is a minimal number of published studies that utilise analytical approaches in the literature. Due to the complexity of the expressions obtained during analytical modelling, usually simpler systems are handled, such as a two-member frame (Heppler et al., 2003). Another common simplification is to separate the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviours of frames (Åkesson, 1976). However, it should be noted that limiting the scope of the formulations to only out-of-plane or only in-plane will, of course, yield a certain set of the natural frequencies of the structure and not a complete set of natural frequencies in the range of interest. To this extent, the transfer matrix method is one of the most frequently encountered analytical methods in the literature (Bozdogan and Ozturk, 2010; Lin and Ro, 2003; Nagem and Williams, 1989; Uhrig, 1966; Yang et al., 2017). As a method for analytical solutions, the wave vibration approach enables one to solve the vibrations of structures as complex as multi-bay frames in an exact way (Mei, 2013).

Furthermore, Antes et al. (2004) deal with the dynamics of Timoshenko beams and frame structures by using the integral equations in the Laplace domain. Moving on to more complex cases, Labib et al. (2014) propose a methodology to identify cracks in frames. Khan et al. (2020) combine experimental, analytical and FE methods to assess if a frame structure is damaged. Bozyigit et al. (2020) investigate the free vibrations of a frame system consisting of straight and curved axis beams using a dynamic stiffness matrix. Free vibrations of spatial frame structures consisting of only curved beams are reported by Calio et al. (2014) by using the exact dynamic stiffness matrix method.

In the literature, planar frames are more common (Mansouri and Saffari, 2012). Sotiropoulos (1982) deals with the vibration problems of planar frames using the exact stiffness matrix in a semi-analytical approach. Moreover, Beattie (1987) develops a technique to calculate the lower bounds of the natural frequencies of frames and tests this methodology on planar frames. There are studies analytically modelling the free vibrations of planar frame-type structures using the initial values method. In these studies, a beam formulation that considers the effects of axial stretch, shear strain, and rotary inertia is utilised, and the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviours are considered together. Yucel et al. (2014) handle the vibrations of planar frame structures using the initial values method, considering axial elongation, shear deformation and rotary inertia. Eroğlu and Tüfekci (2017) develop an analytical solution to model the vibrations of damaged frames where the axial and shear deformations, as well as rotary inertia, are taken into account. Besides, some studies focus on the analytical modelling of spatial frame structures using a more straightforward approach, namely, the Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, for each member (Mei and Sha, 2015; Tu et al., 2008).

This study develops a method to model the three-dimensional free vibrations of spatial frame structures consisting of straight beams, based on the exact analytical solution with the method of initial values. As can be seen from the published literature, no study has been published yet which aims to investigate the free vibration behaviour of spatial frame structures analytically by considering the effects of axial and shear deformations and rotary inertias. The consideration of the shear deformations in the formulation enables one to analyse frames that consist of short and thick beam members with better accuracy. Initially used for modelling the planar frames (Eroglu and Tufekci, 2017; Yucel et al., 2014), the method is implemented here to analyse complex, three-dimensional frame structures by considering spatial behaviours. The position and orientation of the beams needed to be defined in three-dimensional space are considered in the continuity conditions with the help of the direction cosines matrix. The first example shows that the computer code written in GNU Octave can give consistent results with the Euler–Bernoulli beam model for a frame structure made of slender beams. Furthermore, to demonstrate the effect of shear deformations on the natural frequencies, computed results for a frame having lower slenderness ratios are compared with those calculated with a commercial finite element software package, ABAQUS. In the second and third examples, two well-known three-dimensional engineering structures, namely, a radio antenna mast and a Stewart platform-like structure, are analysed, and it is shown that computed results are consistent with those calculated with ABAQUS. In all examples, the mode shapes displayed are extracted from the finite element analyses. The main contribution of this study is to develop the analytical methodology and to formulate the exact solution of the free vibrations of spatial frames that predicts their spatial dynamic behaviour accurately without the question of convergence and the computational cost of the numerical methods. This method enables one to easily examine the effect of each parameter on the dynamic behaviour of the spatial frames and to design the desired structure quickly.

2. Formulation

2.1. Governing differential equations

The system of first-order differential equations that represents the structural response of a Timoshenko beam of uniform cross-section with a straight axis can be written in the most general form as in equation (1)

\frac{d y}{d z} = A y + f (z)

(1)

Here, $z$ is the beam axis coordinate; $y$ is the vector of variables; $A$ is the coefficient matrix, $f (z)$ represents the external load vector including the external distributed forces and moments. Based on this system of equations, the differential equations governing the free vibration behaviour can be expressed through the following set of 12 first-order differential equations that mathematically represent in-plane and out-of-plane vibrations simultaneously, with the assumption that inertia forces and moments are included within the external load vector in accordance with the d'Alembert’s principle, and the harmonic vibration assumption (Yucel et al., 2014)

\frac{d u}{d z} = Ω_{y} + \frac{k_{x}}{G A} F_{x}

(2)

\frac{d v}{d z} = - Ω_{x} + \frac{k_{y}}{G A} F_{y}

(3)

\frac{d w}{d z} = \frac{1}{E A} F_{z}

(4)

\frac{d Ω_{x}}{d z} = \frac{1}{E I_{x}} M_{x}

(5)

\frac{d Ω_{y}}{d z} = \frac{1}{E I_{y}} M_{y}

(6)

\frac{d Ω_{z}}{d z} = \frac{1}{G I_{b}} M_{z}

(7)

\frac{d F_{x}}{d z} = - μ ω^{2} u

(8)

\frac{d F_{y}}{d z} = - μ ω^{2} v

(9)

\frac{d F_{z}}{d z} = - μ ω^{2} w

(10)

\frac{d M_{x}}{d z} = - μ \frac{I_{x}}{A} ω^{2} Ω_{x} + F_{y}

(11)

\frac{d M_{y}}{d z} = - μ \frac{I_{y}}{A} ω^{2} Ω_{y} - F_{x}

(12)

\frac{d M_{z}}{d z} = - μ \frac{I_{z}}{A} ω^{2} Ω_{z}

(13)

Here, $u$ , $v$ and $w$ are the displacement components in the $x$ , $y$ and $z$ axes, respectively; $Ω_{x}$ , $Ω_{y}$ and $Ω_{z}$ are the rotation angles of the section around these axes, respectively. Internal forces are $F_{x}$ , $F_{y}$ and $F_{z}$ . Similarly, $M_{x}$ , $M_{y}$ and $M_{z}$ represent internal moments. The shear correction factors in the $x$ and $y$ axes are defined as $k_{x}$ and $k_{y}$ respectively, and both are taken as $6 / 5$ for rectangular cross-section and 10/9 for circular cross-section in this study. Also, $E$ and $G$ are moduli of elasticity and shear, respectively; $A$ is the cross-sectional area; $I_{x}$ , $I_{y}$ and $I_{z}$ are the area moments of inertia in the $x$ , $y$ and $z$ axes, respectively; $I_{b}$ is the torsional constant; $μ$ stands for mass per unit length and $ω$ for angular frequency.

2.2. Approach to the solution

Equations (2)–(13) can be written in matrix form as in equation (14)

\frac{d y}{d z} = A y

(14)

Equation (14) is also the homogeneous form of equation (1) which needs to be formulated individually for each beam member in the frame system. Hence, the number of unknowns becomes $12 \times n$ for a frame system with $n$ beams. If each beam member has a uniform cross-section, the matrix $A$ only consists of constants, which makes an exact solution conductable. The exact solution of the system of differential equations which is given in equation (14), can be obtained as in equation (15)

y = e^{A z} y_{o}

(15)

Here, $y_{o}$ , is the vector of initial values, and its open form is presented in equation (16)

y_{o} = {[\begin{array}{c} u_{o} & v_{o} & w_{o} & Ω_{x o} & Ω_{y o} & Ω_{z o} & F_{x o} & F_{y o} & F_{z o} & M_{x o} & M_{y o} & M_{z o} \end{array}]}^{T}

(16)

Also, the matrix $e^{A z}$ used to obtain displacements, rotations, internal forces and moments at any position of the beam from these initial values is called the principal matrix and contains the exact solution. While solving the free vibration response of a single beam member can be obtained by using only the relevant boundary conditions over this principal matrix, the free vibration behaviour of stepped beams (Tufekci and Yigit, 2013) or frame-type structures (Eroglu and Tufekci, 2017; Yucel et al., 2014) can also be investigated by defining the continuity conditions. The boundary conditions used in this study belong to the fixed and free ends and can be defined as follows

Fixed end

u = v = w = Ω_{x} = Ω_{y} = Ω_{z} = 0

(17)

Free end

F_{x} = F_{y} = F_{z} = M_{x} = M_{y} = M_{z} = 0

(18)

In these models with more than one beam member, the three-dimensional expression of the transition points/nodes, which ensure the kinematic and kinetic continuity of the beam junctions, is explored in Section 2.3.

Regardless of whether the structure of interest is a beam or a frame, the set of equations obtained as a result of applying the boundary and continuity conditions together with equation (15) is algebraic and leads to the eigenvalue problem

F (ω) y_{o} = 0

(19)

It is sufficient to find the roots of the coefficients matrix $F (ω)$ (using numerical root-finding algorithms) to obtain the natural frequency of the structure of interest.

2.3. Modelling of the continuity conditions

The kinematic and kinetic continuity conditions, which are also expressed by (Eroglu and Tufekci, 2017) for planar frames, mentioned in the previous section, are given below in equations (20) and (21) using the matrix form. These equations are formulated to express the continuity between the $i^{t h}$ beam and the others

Q_{i + m} X_{i} (L_{i}) - X_{i + m} (0) = 0 (m = 1,2, \dots, n)

(20)

F_{i} (L_{i}) - \sum_{m = 1}^{n} Q_{i + m}^{- 1} F_{i + m} (0) = 0

(21)

Here, $Q$ refers to the transformation matrix. Also, vectors $X$ and $F$ represent the vectors containing displacements (and rotations) and internal forces (and moments), respectively.

However, although the planar cases and spatial cases follow similar steps of application, two new cases arise that need to be considered in the mathematical model:

(1) If the frame structure of interest is three-dimensional, obviously, all the beam elements are no longer in the same plane. Therefore, in order to model the positions of these elements in space, it is necessary to construct the transformation matrix written in the planar state for the spatial form.

(2) The orientation of the section in space must also be considered.

To include these two aspects in the analysis, the direction cosine matrix is used (Nikravesh, 1988). To do so, three different sets of coordinates, namely, local coordinate systems, segment coordinate systems and global coordinate system, are used in the structure (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Coordinate systems used in the formulation.

The local coordinate system ( $x_{L} - y_{L} - z_{L}$ ) is the set of coordinates defined on each beam. Segment, as a sub-beam group containing only one junction point; segment coordinate system ( $x_{S} - y_{S} - z_{S}$ ) is defined as the coordinate set on only one beam in each segment. The global coordinate system ( $x_{G} - y_{G} - z_{G}$ ) is the only set of coordinates placed at any point on the frame.

Based on the fact that at least three points are needed to be known precisely for the determination of the position and orientation of a beam in space. Therefore, alongside the first end ( $A$ ) and the second end ( $B$ ) points on the axis of the beam, an arbitrary point ( $S$ ) is chosen in the cross-section where ( $A$ ) is also located to specify the cross-sectional orientation (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Points and coordinate systems used to describe the beam members in space.

By using these three points defined according to the global coordinate set, transformation is made between the global coordinate set and the segment coordinate set over the direction cosine matrix, and the coordinates of the beam are redefined in the segment coordinate system. Here the transformation matrix is expressed as in equation (22)

T = {[\begin{array}{c} n_{X} & n_{S / A} & n_{B / A} \end{array}]}^{- 1}

(22)

Then, using the same approach, the transformation matrix that provides the relationship between the segment coordinate system and the local coordinate system is generated, and the continuity conditions given in equations (19) and (20) are written using this matrix as presented in equation (23)

Q = [\begin{array}{c} T & 0 \\ 0 & T \end{array}]

(23)

The algorithm of the computer code is presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The algorithm of the computer program.

3. Numerical examples

3.1. Example 1

As the first example, the three-dimensional three-storey frame structure given in Figure 4 is considered, which is also solved by Tu et al. (2008). In this structure, the lower ends of the ground floor beams are fixed, and all the beams are $L = 100$ in long. The cross-sectional dimensions for the rectangular profile are 2 in × 2 in. Density is taken as $2.588 * 10^{- 3}$ lb/in³ the modulus of elasticity and the shear modulus as $1 * 10^{7}$ psi, and $8 * 10^{6}$ psi, respectively. The finite element model is built in ABAQUS using 1200 B31 beam elements.

Figure 4.

Three-dimensional three-storey frame structure.

Furthermore, the same case is investigated for different slenderness ratios by using different beam lengths for all the beam members while keeping the material properties, cross-section, number of elements and the three-storey structure the same.

3.2. Example 2

The ham radio antenna mast is an essential structure that amateur radio enthusiasts use due to being portable and deployable. It is mainly located outdoors, so it is necessary to perform modal analysis during design considering its interaction with the wind. A similar structure shown in Figure 5 is aimed to analyse as an application of the method here. The length of the upper portion of the antenna $(L_{2})$ is taken as 3 m, and its circular cross-section has a 10 cm diameter. Each support leg is $L_{1} = 1$ m in length with a circular cross-section in 5 cm diameter, and it is assumed that support legs build a hypothetical tetrahedron at the base. The material is assumed to be steel with a density of $7800$ kg/m³, Poisson’s ratio of $0.3$ and modulus of elasticity of $210 * 10^{9}$ N/m². In addition, one end of the support legs and the base of the antenna are modelled as clamped. The finite element model is built using 687 B31 beam elements.

Figure 5.

Ham radio antenna mast.

3.3. Example 3

In the third example, a relatively more complex structure that is similar to the Stewart platform is analysed (Figure 6). In this structure, all cross-sections are assumed as circular, and while diameters of the upper members are taken as 0.1 m, for the lower members as 0.06 m. Same material properties as in Example 2 are used, and the lower ends of lower members are clamped to the ground. Coordinates of the boundaries and junctions with respect to global coordinate system are presented in Figure 6. The finite element model is built using 634 B31 beam elements.

Figure 6.

The Stewart platform-like spatial structure.

4. Results and discussion: Numerical examples

4.1. Example 1

The natural frequencies calculated for the first 10 modes using the GNU Octave are compared to the results obtained from the literature and the ABAQUS finite element software package and presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparison of calculated natural frequencies (Hz).

Modes	Present study	[47]	ABAQUS
1	1.4399	1.4403	1.4403
2	1.4399	1.4403	1.4403
3	2.0799	2.1494	2.0803
4	4.6945	4.6961	4.6959
5	4.6945	4.6961	4.6959
6	6.3311	6.4730	6.3328
7	7.3274	7.3366	7.3297
8	8.2924	8.2972	8.2951
9	8.2924	8.2972	8.2951
10	9.3792	9.4069	9.3823

It is observed that there is a very good agreement between the calculated results and the results from the literature (Tu et al., 2008). It is also noted that the maximum error is around 3.2% between the calculated results and the ones in Tu et al. (2008). This is judged to be based on the differences in the formulations used in this study and Tu et al. (2008). The presented formulation in this study takes into account the effects of shear deformations and rotary inertia due to bending deformations, Tu et al. (2008) neglects these effects in the formulation. The first 10 mode shapes are also displayed in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Mode shapes of the first 10 modes.

As seen from Figure 7, mode 1 is the first out-of-plane bending mode and mode 2 is the corresponding in-plane one. Similarly, the pairs of modes 4-5 and 8-9 are the second and third out-of-plane and in-plane bending modes. Mode 3 and 6 are the first and second torsional modes. The rest are coupled mixed modes.

Besides, based on the results calculated for various slenderness ratios ( $λ = L / \sqrt{I / A}$ ), which are presented in Figure 8, it is also noted that the formulation stays in good agreement with ABAQUS results for decreasing slenderness ratios of the beam members. The orthogonal bending modes (1-2, 4-5 and 8-9) coincide with each other as expected and so they are shown with the same curves.

Figure 8.

Natural frequencies of the first 10 modes for various slenderness ratios.

4.2. Example 2

The natural frequencies for the first six modes are calculated analytically using the described method, and these are compared to the results of the ABAQUS finite element analysis software package (Table 2). All the results are found to be consistent with good precision, and it is determined that the maximum error is approximately 0.008%. Figure 9 depicts the first 11 mode shapes of the ham radio antenna mast. Similar to the first example, orthogonal bending modes are observed and presented in pairs both in Table 2 and Figure 9. The mode pairs 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 8-9 and 10-11 are dominantly the first five bending modes of the mast with a coupling with the supporting beam members while mode 7 is the first torsional mode. One thing to note about the torsional mode is that Figure 9 displays the translational displacements and therefore the mast seems not to deform. However, the mast is in torsional motion which is calculated within the rotational degrees of freedom of the beam elements during the finite element analysis.

Table 2.

Comparison of the calculated natural frequencies (Hz).

Modes	Present study	ABAQUS
1–2	7.0512	7.0511
3–4	44.2743	44.2722
5–6	122.6839	122.6736
7	193.7706	193.7648
8–9	206.0957	206.0824
10–11	226.9958	226.9796

Figure 9.

Mode shapes of the first six modes.

4.3. Example 3

Table 3 presents calculated results and numerical analysis results obtained from the ABAQUS finite element analysis software. The natural frequencies calculated using both methods are congruent with just minor numerical precision errors, which are way below 0.004%. The mode shapes for the first 10 modes are displayed in Figure 10. For the mode shapes calculated for this example, there is no straightforward way to describe them using a dominant deformation type. The mode shapes all appear to be coupled mixed modes of bending, torsional and extension deformations of individual beams and there is no global dominant deformation.

Table 3.

Comparison of the calculated natural frequencies for the third example (Hz).

Modes	Present study	ABAQUS
1	29.2013	29.2009
2	33.7316	33.7310
3	59.4725	59.4703
4	65.4999	65.4989
5	73.2034	73.2006
6	118.1502	118.1493
7	128.8642	128.8638
8	133.9379	133.9374
9	142.9266	142.9231
10	153.1653	153.1635

Figure 10.

Mode shapes of the first 10 modes.

5. Conclusion

In this study, the free vibration behaviour of spatial frame structures is analysed and solved analytically using the general basic equations of the beam theory. The effects of axial elongation, shear deformation and rotary inertias are considered in this analysis. Considering constant rigidity, an analytical solution is obtained exactly using the initial values method. In the spatial modelling of the frame structure, the method of direction cosine matrices is used. Three different examples are solved and the results computed are compared with the literature and the results obtained from the finite element analysis. A good agreement is found between the results. The approach in this study presents an effective and rapid way for computer-aided design engineers who want to set up and perform the modal analyses of frame structures in a short time.

It should be mentioned that the main objective of the presented study is to show the initial values method can be successfully applied to the free vibration analysis of the spatial frames. The main advantage of following this methodology is achieving a great level of precision and accuracy while having to deal with only a fraction of the computational cost of the conventional numerical methods such as FEM. As mentioned above, the constant rigidity assumption provides a basis for the exact analytical solution, but the method can also be implemented in the variable rigidity case, which requires a semi-analytical or numerical solution. In this sense, it is possible to extend the presented work to investigate the mechanical behaviour of spatial frame-type structures made of functionally graded materials and composite materials, which include straight and curved beams together.

Another point that should be noted is the importance of the analytical investigation. Today, finite element analysis is a powerful tool to analyse such structures given in this study. However, the authors believe that analytical modelling is one of the most suitable frameworks that allows engineers to conduct detailed parametric analyses in addition to its scientific value. Besides, the analytical studies have always contributed to the development of numerical methods. Thus, it is expected that the analysis of the mechanical behaviour of spatial frame-type structures, which is only found in a limited number of publications in the literature, with analytical methods can be made more interesting and can be conducted in a powerful way by this method.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

ORCID iDs

Ömer Ekim Genel

Mertol Tüfekci

Ekrem Tüfekci

References

Åkesson

(1976) PFVIBAT—a computer program for plane frame vibration analysis by an exact method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 10(6): 1221–1231. DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620100603

Al-Furjan

MSH

Habibi

, et al. (2020) Frequency simulation of viscoelastic multi-phase reinforced fully symmetric systems. Engineering with Computers 1: 3. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-020-01200-x

Al-Furjan

MSH

Hatami

Habibi

, et al. (2021) On the vibrations of the imperfect sandwich higher-order disk with a lactic core using generalize differential quadrature method. Composite Structures 257: 113150. DOI: 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.113150

Al-Furjan

MSH

Habibi

Rahimi

, et al. (2022) Chaotic simulation of the multi-phase reinforced thermo-elastic disk using GDQM. Engineering with Computers 38(S1): 219–242. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-020-01144-2

Ansell

(2005) The dynamic element method for analysis of frame and cable type structures. Engineering Structures. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.010.

Antes

Schanz

Alvermann

(2004) Dynamic analyses of plane frames by integral equations for bars and Timoshenko beams. Journal of Sound and Vibration 276: 807–836. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.08.048

Basci

Toridis

Khozeimeh

, et al. (1979) Improved method of free vibration analysis of frame structures. Computers & Structures 10(1–2): 255–265. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(79)90094-4

Beattie

(1987) Lower bounds for the resonant frequencies of nonuniform frame structures. ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 67(11): 545–556. DOI: 10.1002/zamm.19870671106

Bozdogan

Ozturk

(2010) Vibration analysis of asymmetic-plan frame buildings using transfer matrix method. Mathematical and Computational Applications 15(2): 279–288.

10.

Bozyigit

Yesilce

Acikgoz

(2020) Free vibration analysis of arch-frames using the dynamic stiffness approach. Vibroengineering Procedia 30: 72–78. DOI: 10.21595/vp.2020.21291

11.

Caliò

Greco

D'Urso

(2014) Free vibrations of spatial Timoshenko arches. Journal of Sound and Vibration 333: 4543–4561. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.04.019

12.

Chaker

Cherifati

(1999) Influence of masonry infill panels on the vibration and stiffness characteristics of R/C frame buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 28(9): 1061–1065. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1061::AID-EQE856>3.0.CO;2-3

13.

Chan

GWM

(1994) Nonlinear vibration analysis of steel frames with semirigid connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 120(4): 1075–1087. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1994)120:4(1075).

14.

Chen

(1995) A spline wavelets element method for frame structures vibration. Computational Mechanics 16(1): 11–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00369881

15.

Chen

Zhu

(2021) Dynamic evaluation on ride comfort of metro vehicle considering structural flexibility. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 21(4): 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s43452-021-00310-7

16.

Chen

Xiao

Mou

, et al. (2019) Study on establishment of standardized load spectrum on bogie frames of high-speed trains. Acta Mechanica Sinica/Lixue Xuebao 35(4). 812–827. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-019-00841-6

17.

Cuong-Le

Nguyen

Le-Minh

, et al. (2022) Nonlinear bending analysis of porous sigmoid FGM nanoplate via IGA and nonlocal strain gradient theory. Advances in nano research 12(5): 441–455. DOI: 10.12989/ANR.2022.12.5.441

18.

Eroglu

Tufekci

(2017) Free vibration of damaged frame structures considering the effects of axial extension, shear deformation and rotatory inertia: exact solution. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 17(10): 1750111. DOI: 10.1142/S0219455417501115

19.

Fatahi

Moradi

Ghanbarzadeh

(2015) The application of the geometric offset method to the rigid joint modeling in the differential quadrature element model updating of frame structures. Meccanica 50(6): 1509–1525. DOI: 10.1007/s11012-015-0103-6

20.

Freund

Karakoç

(2016) Shear and torsion correction factors of Timoshenko beam model for generic cross sections. Research on Engineering Structures & Materials (February). DOI: 10.17515/resm2015.19me0827

21.

Heppler

Oguamanam

DCD

Hansen

(2003) Vibration of a two-member open frame. Journal of Sound and Vibration 263(2): 299–317. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01125-2

22.

Howson

Williams

(1973) Natural frequencies of frames with axially loaded Timoshenko members. Journal of Sound and Vibration 26(4): 503–515. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80216-0

23.

Huang

Hao

Oslub

, et al. (2021) Dynamic stability/instability simulation of the rotary size-dependent functionally graded microsystem. Engineering with Computers 1: 3. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01399-3

24.

Ibrahim

Crolla

Barton

(1996) Effect of frame flexibility on the ride vibration of trucks. Computers & Structures 58(4): 709–713. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00198-P

25.

Kaiser

Widani

Härtel

, et al. (2017) Development and verification of a high-performance CFRP structure for the space-borne lidar instrument ALADIN, p. 87. DOI: 10.1117/12.2308121

26.

Kamgar

Saadatpour

(2012) A simple mathematical model for free vibration analysis of combined system consisting of framed tube, shear core, belt truss and outrigger system with geometrical discontinuities. Applied Mathematical Modelling 36(10): 4918–4930. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.029

27.

Khan

Akhtar

Ahmad

, et al. (2020) Vibration analysis of damaged and undamaged steel structure systems: cantilever column and frame. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 19(3): 725–737. DOI: 10.1007/s11803-020-0591-9

28.

Kumar

Gupta

Tounsi

(2021) Size-dependent vibration response of porous graded nanostructure with FEM and nonlocal continuum model. Advances in Nano Research 11(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.12989/ANR.2021.11.1.001

29.

Labib

Kennedy

Featherston

(2014) Free vibration analysis of beams and frames with multiple cracks for damage detection. Journal of Sound and Vibration 333(20): 4991–5003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.05.015

30.

Wang

Jiang

, et al. (2022) Dynamic response analysis of a whole steel frame solar greenhouse under wind loads. Scientific Reports 12(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09248-z

31.

Lin

(2003) Vibration analysis of planar serial-frame structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration 262(5): 1113–1131. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01089-1

32.

Lin

(2005) Dynamic analysis of planar closed-frame structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration 282: 249–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.027

33.

Mansouri

Saffari

(2012) An efficient nonlinear analysis of 2D frames using a Newton-like technique. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 12(4): 485–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2012.07.003

34.

Massumi

Absalan

(2013) Interaction between bracing system and moment resisting frame in braced RC frames. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 13(2): 260–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.01.004

35.

Mead

(2002) Free vibrations of self-strained assemblies of beams. Journal of Sound and Vibration 249: 101–127. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3830

36.

Mei

(2013) Free vibration analysis of classical single-story multi-bay planar frames. JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control 19(13): 2022–2035. DOI: 10.1177/1077546312455081

37.

Mei

Sha

(2015) An exact analytical approach for free vibration analysis of built-up space frames. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Transactions of the ASME 137(3): 031005. DOI: 10.1115/1.4029380

38.

Minghini

Tullini

Laudiero

(2010) Vibration analysis of pultruded FRP frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures 32(10): 3344–3354. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.008

39.

Moon

Choi

(2000) Vibration analysis for frame structures using transfer of dynamic stiffness coefficient. Journal of Sound and Vibration 234(5): 725–736. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2970

40.

Nagem

Williams

(1989) Dynamic analysis of large space structures using transfer matrices and joint coupling matrices. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 17(3): 349–371. DOI: 10.1080/089054508915646

41.

Kuang

(2000) Triply coupled vibration of asymmetric wall-frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering 126(8): 982–987. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:8(982).

42.

Nikolakopoulos

Katsareas

Papadopoulos

(1997) Crack identification in frame structures. Computers & Structures 64(1–4): 389–406.

43.

Nikravesh

(1988) Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

44.

Ovunc

(1974) Dynamics of frameworks by continuous mass method. Computers & Structures 4: 1061–1089. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(74)90024-8

45.

Pham

Truong

(2020) Fuzzy finite element analysis for free vibration response of functionally graded semi-rigid frame structures. Applied Mathematical Modelling 88: 852–869. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.014

46.

Rafezy

Zare

Howson

(2007) Coupled lateral-torsional frequencies of asymmetric, three-dimensional frame structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures 44: 128–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.019

47.

Ranjbaran

(2014) Free-vibration analysis of stiffened frames. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 140(9): 04014071. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000783

48.

Rezaiee-Pajand

Khajavi

(2011) Vibration analysis of plane frames by customized stiffness and diagonal mass matrices. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 225(12): 2848–2863. DOI: 10.1177/0954406211405435

49.

Sophianopoulos

Kounadis

(1989) The axial motion effect on the dynamic response of a laterally vibrating frame subject to a moving load. Acta Mechanica 79(3–4): 277–294. DOI: 10.1007/BF01187267

50.

Sotiropoulos

(1982) The transcendental eigenvalue problem of the exact dynamic stiffness matrix of linearly elastic plane frames. ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 62(7): 313–319. DOI: 10.1002/zamm.19820620705

51.

Lien

, et al. (2008) Free vibration analysis of frames using the transfer dynamic stiffness matrix method. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Transactions of the ASME 130(2): 1–3. DOI: 10.1115/1.2827366

52.

Tüfekçi

Arpaci

(1998) Exact solution of in-plane vibrations of circular arches with account taken of axial extension, transverse shear and rotatory inertia effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration 209(5): 845–856. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1290

53.

Tufekci

Yigit

(2013) In-plane vibration of circular arches with varying cross-sections. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 13(1): 1350003. DOI: 10.1142/S021945541350003X

54.

Tüfekci

Genel

ÖE

Tatar

, et al. (2020a) Dynamic analysis of composite wind turbine blades as beams: an analytical and numerical study. Vibration 4(1): 1–15. DOI: 10.3390/vibration4010001

55.

Tüfekci

Dikicioğlu

(2020b) Numerical investigation of the collapse of a steel truss roof and a probable reason of failure. Applied Sciences 10(21): 1–20. DOI: 10.3390/app10217769

56.

Tuzzi

Schwingshackl

Green

(2020) Study of coupling between shaft bending and disc zero nodal diameter modes in a flexible shaft-disc assembly. Journal of Sound and Vibration 479: 115362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115362.

57.

Uhrig

(1966) The transfer matrix method seen as one method of structural analysis among others. Journal of Sound and Vibration 4(2): 136–148. DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(66)90117-9

58.

van Vinh

Tounsi

(2022) Free vibration analysis of functionally graded doubly curved nanoshells using nonlocal first-order shear deformation theory with variable nonlocal parameters. Thin-Walled Structures 174: 109084. DOI: 10.1016/J.TWS.2022.109084

59.

Wallner

Ergenzinger

Tuttle

, et al. (2010) EUCLID mission design. In: International conference of space optics, Rhodes, Greece, 2010, p. 90. DOI: 10.1117/12.2309226

60.

Wang

Zhou

(2004) Application of a new differential quadrature element method to free vibrational analysis of beams and frame structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration 269: 1133–1141. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00405-X

61.

Woo

(1986) Space frame optimization subject to frequency constraints. Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 1(10): 103–115. DOI: 10.2514/6.1986-877

62.

Yang

Gao

Chen

, et al. (2017) Vibration analysis and development of an ultrasonic elliptical vibration tool based on a portal frame structure. Precision Engineering 50: 421–432. DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.06.016

63.

Yucel

Arpaci

Tufekci

(2014) Coupled axial-flexural-torsional vibration of Timoshenko frames. JVC/Journal of Vibration and Control 20(15): 2366–2377. DOI: 10.1177/1077546313484348

64.

Zbrowski

(2014) Experimental tests concerning the impact resistance of a tailplane. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 14(1): 53–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.08.006

65.

Zhu

Sun

, et al. (2016) Theoretical research and experimental validation of elastic dynamic load spectra on bogie frame of high-speed train. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 29(3): 498–506. DOI: 10.3901/CJME.2016.0308.027