In this article, we propose a new perspective mathematical model of the beam with the distributed hysteresis properties. Hysteresis properties are formalized within two approaches: phenomenological (Bouc-Wen model) and design (Prandtl-Ishlinskii model). The equations for the beam vibrations are obtained using the well-known Hamilton approach. The dynamical response of the beam with distributed hysteresis is considered under various types of external load, such as impulse, periodic, and a seismic load. Numerical simulations show that the hysteresis beam is more “resistant” to external loads than the classical Euler-Bernoulli beam. Particularly, with the same types of the external load, the amplitude of oscillations of the hysteresis beam as well as its energy characteristics are lower than those of the classical one. These results may find some applications in the field of the design of earthquake-resistant constructions and buildings.
Al JanaidehMKrejčíP (2011) An inversion formula for a Prandtl–Ishlinskii operator with time dependent thresholds. Physica B: Condensed Matter406(8): 1528–1532. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2011.01.062.
2.
Al JanaidehMDavinoDKrejčíP, et al. (2016) Comparison of Prandtl–Ishlinskiı˘ and Preisach modeling for smart devices applications. Physica B: Condensed Matter486: 155–159. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2016.01.008.
BOUCR (1967) Forced Vibrations of Mechanical Systems with Hysteresis”, Journal=”proc. Of the Fourth Conference on Nonlinear Oscillations, prague, 1967.
5.
BoucR (1969) Modèle mathématique d’hystérésis. Application aux systèmes à un degré de liberté.
6.
BrokateMKrejčíP (2015) Weak differentiability of scalar hysteresis operators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A35(6): 2405–2421. DOI:10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2405.
7.
DargahiARakhejaSSedaghatiR (2019) Development of a field dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii model for magnetorheological elastomers. Materials & Design166: 107608. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107608.
8.
DaubechiesI (1992) Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. DOI:10.1137/1.9781611970104.
9.
DeschWTuriJ (1999) The stop operator related to a convex polyhedron. Journal of Differential Equations157(2): 329–347. DOI:10.1006/jdeq.1998.3601.
10.
ElishakoffI (2020) Who developed the so-called timoshenko beam theory?Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids25(1): 97–116. DOI:10.1177/1081286519856931.
11.
EsenI (2020) Dynamics of size-dependant timoshenko micro beams subjected to moving loads. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences175: 105501. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105501.
12.
FariaCTInmanDJ (2014) Modeling energy transport in a cantilevered Euler–Bernoulli beam actively vibrating in Newtonian fluid. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing45(2): 317–329. DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.12.003.
13.
FirouziN (2022) Mechanics of nonlinear visco-hyperelastic-hysteresis membranes. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics147: 104231. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2022.104231.
14.
GhafariradHRezaeiSSarhanA, et al. (2014) A novel time dependent prandtl-ishlinskii model for sensorless hysteresis compensation in piezoelectric actuators. IFAC Proceedings Volumes47(3): 2703–2708. DOI10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01534.
15.
GoldmanR (2005) Curvature formulas for implicit curves and surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design22(7): 632–658. DOI:10.1016/j.cagd.2005.06.005.
16.
HassaniVTjahjowidodoTDoTN (2014) A survey on hysteresis modeling, identification and control. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing49(1): 209–233. DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.04.012.
17.
HuaCWangYYangY, et al. (2020) Force feedback control for bilateral teleoperation system with unknown prandtl-ishlinskii hysteresis. Journal of the Franklin Institute357(13): 8321–8341. DOI:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.03.001.
18.
IkhouaneFRodellarJ (2005a) On the hysteretic Bouc–Wen model. Nonlinear Dynamics42(1): 63–78. DOI:10.1007/s11071-005-0069-3.
19.
IkhouaneFRodellarJ (2005b) On the hysteretic bouc–wen model. Nonlinear Dynamics42(1): 79–95. DOI:10.1007/s11071-005-0070-x.
20.
IkhouaneFHurtadoJERodellarJ (2007) Variation of the hysteresis loop with the Bouc–Wen model parameters. Nonlinear Dynamics48(4): 361–380. DOI:10.1007/s11071-006-9091-3.
21.
IsmailMIkhouaneFRodellarJ (2009) The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering16(2): 161–188. DOI:10.1007/s11831-009-9031-8.
22.
IwanWD (1966) A distributed-element model for hysteresis and its steady-state dynamic response. Journal of Applied Mechanics33(4): 893–900. DOI:10.1115/1.3625199.
23.
KaravasilisTLKerawalaSHaleE (2012) Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel buildings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research70: 358–367. DOI:10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.010.
24.
Krasnosel’skiiMNiezgodkaMPokrovskiiA (2012) Systems with Hysteresis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
25.
Krejčı́P (2002) Reliable solutions to the problem of periodic oscillations of an elastoplastic beam. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics37(8): 1337–1349. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7462(02)00022-7.
26.
Krejčı́PSprekelsJ (2001) On a class of multi-dimensional Prandtl–Ishlinskii operators. Physica B: Condensed Matter306(1): 185–190. DOI:10.1016/S0921-4526(01)01001-8.
27.
KryskoAAwrejcewiczJKutepovI, et al. (2017) Stability of curvilinear euler-Bernoulli beams in temperature fields. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics94: 207–215. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2016.12.004.
28.
LangHDresslerKPinnauR, et al. (2009) Notes on lipschitz estimates for the stop and play operator in plasticity. Applied Mathematics Letters22(4): 623–627. DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2008.07.004.
29.
LiZZhangXMaL (2020) Development of a combined prandtl ishlinskii–preisach model. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical304: 111797. DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2019.111797.
30.
LinYKCaiGQ (1990) Random vibration of hysteretic systems. In: SchiehlenW (ed), Nonlinear Dynamics in Engineering Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 189–196.
31.
MatsuoTTeradaYShimasakiM (2006) Representation of minor hysteresis loops of a silicon steel sheet using stop and play models. Physica B: Condensed Matter372(1): 25–29. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2005.10.121.
32.
MedvedskiiAMeleshenkoPNesterovV, et al. (2020) Unstable oscillating systems with hysteresis: problems of stabilization and control. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International59: 533–556. DOI:10.1134/S1064230720030090.
33.
NiolaVPalliGStranoS, et al. (2019) Nonlinear estimation of the Bouc-Wen model with parameter boundaries: application to seismic isolators. Computers & Structures222: 1–9. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.06.006.
34.
PreisachF (1935) Über die magnetische nachwirkung. Zeitschrift fr Physik94(5): 277–302. DOI:10.1007/BF01349418.
35.
QiaoGRahmatallaS (2021) Dynamics of euler-Bernoulli beams with unknown viscoelastic boundary conditions under a moving load. Journal of Sound and Vibration491: 115771. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115771.
36.
SayyaadiHZakerzadehMR (2012) Position control of shape memory alloy actuator based on the generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii inverse model. Mechatronics22(7): 945–957. DOI:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.06.003.
37.
SchindlbeckCPapeCReithmeierE (2017) Recursive online compensation of piezoelectric nonlinearities via a modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine50(1): 15561–15567. DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1881.
38.
SemenovMSolovyovAMeleshenkoP, et al. (2018) Nonlinear Damping: From Viscous to Hysteretic Dampers, pp. 259–275. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-63937-6_15.
39.
SemenovMReshetovaOTolkachevA, et al. (2019) Oscillations under Hysteretic Conditions: From Simple Oscillator to Discrete Sine-Gordon Model, pp. 229–253. DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-9463-8_12.
40.
SemenovMBorzunovSMeleshenkoP (2020a) Stochastic preisach operator: definition within the design approach. Nonlinear Dynamics101: 2599–2614. DOI:10.1007/s11071-020-05907-w.
41.
SemenovMSolovyovAMeleshenkoP, et al. (2020b) Efficiency of hysteretic damper in oscillating systems. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena15: 43. DOI:10.1051/mmnp/2019053.
42.
SemenovMReshetovaOBorzunovS, et al. (2021a) Self-oscillations in a system with hysteresis: the small parameter approach. The European Physical Journal Special Topics230: 3565–3571. DOI:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00237-3.
43.
SemenovMEKarpovEATikhomirovSG, et al. (2021b) Stabilization of chaos via strong nonlinearities: the lorenz-malkus wheel under coulomb and hystersis frictions. In: BalthazarJM (ed), Vibration Engineering and Technology of Machinery. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3–36.
44.
SemenovMESolovyovAMMeleshenkoPA (2021c) Stabilization of coupled inverted pendula: from discrete to continuous case. Journal of Vibration and Control27(1–2): 43–56. DOI:10.1177/1077546320923436.
45.
SemenovMBorzunovSMeleshenkoP (2022) A new way to compute the lyapunov characteristic exponents for non-smooth and discontinues dynamical systems. Nonlinear Dynamics109: 1805–1821. DOI:10.1007/s11071-022-07492-6.
46.
ShirgirSAzarBFHadidiA (2020) Reliability-based simplification of Bouc-Wen model and parameter identification using a new hybrid algorithm. Structures27: 297–308. DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.024.
47.
SonNNVan KienCAnhHPH (2020) Parameters identification of Bouc–Wen hysteresis model for piezoelectric actuators using hybrid adaptive differential evolution and jaya algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence87: 103317. DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103317.
48.
TimoshenkoS (1983) History of strength of materials: with a brief account of the history of theory of elasticity and theory of structures. Dover Civil and Mechanical Engineering Series. Dover Publications.
49.
TollmienWSchlichtingHGörtlerH, et al. (1961) Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinetischen Theorie der festen Körper. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 149–184. DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-11836-8_12.
50.
VisintinA (2006) Chapter 1 - mathematical models of hysteresis. In: BertottiGMayergoyzID (eds.) The Science of Hysteresis. Oxford: Academic Press. pp. 1–123. DOI:10.1016/B978-012480874-4/50004-X.
51.
WangLChenYChengG, et al. (2020) Numerical analysis of fractional partial differential equations applied to polymeric visco-elastic Euler-Bernoulli beam under quasi-static loads. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals140: 110255. DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110255.
52.
YangMJGuGYZhuLM (2013) Parameter identification of the generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model for piezoelectric actuators using modified particle swarm optimization. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical189: 254–265. DOI:10.1016/j.sna.2012.10.029.
53.
YuHYangYYuanY (2018) Analytical solution for a finite Euler–Bernoulli beam with single discontinuity in section under arbitrary dynamic loads. Applied Mathematical Modelling60: 571–580. DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2018.03.046.
54.
ZhenBXuJSunJ (2020) Analytical solutions for steady state responses of an infinite euler-Bernoulli beam on a nonlinear viscoelastic foundation subjected to a harmonic moving load. Journal of Sound and Vibration476: 115271. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115271.
