This study conducts a 3D comparison of Triple (TFPI) and Quintuple (QFPI) Friction Pendulum isolators for a six story steel building. Its key innovations are two-fold: first, a performance comparison based on optimally designed isolators with closely matched parameters (such as effective period, effective stiffness, etc.); and second, the novel use of a hybrid design method integrating Capacity Spectrum Analysis with the Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) procedure for the isolator design. The superstructure was designed in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7-2016 and models developed in SAP2000 were validated against OpenSees and literature. Analysis under seven bidirectional far-field records on stiff soil showed QFPI’s superiority, reducing story acceleration and shear by an additional 34% and 30% versus TFPI. While both isolators controlled drift comparably, QFPI achieved this with a 3.5 times more compact design and fewer constraints, demonstrating greater efficiency and practicality.
ASCE7 (2010) Minimum Design Load for Building and Other Structures. American Society Civil Engineers.
2.
ASCE7 (2016) Minimum Design Load for Building and Other Structures. American Society Civil Engineers.
3.
BeckerTC (2011) Advanced Modeling of the Performance of Structures Supported on Triple Friction Pendulum Bearings. University of California.
4.
CalviPMCalviGM (2018) Historical development of friction-based seismic isolation systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering106: 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.003
5.
ClarkeCSBuchananREfthymiouM, et al. (2005) Structural platform solution for seismic arctic environments-Sakhalin II offshore facilities. Paper Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference.
6.
DaoNDRyanKLSatoE, et al. (2013) Predicting the displacement of triple pendulum™ bearings in a full‐scale shaking experiment using a three‐dimensional element. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics42(11): 1677–1695. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2293
7.
DomadzraYBhandariMHasanM (2025) Enhancing earthquake resilience: a review of friction pendulum seismic isolation techniques. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering26(3): 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01231-5
8.
FenzDM (2008) Development, Implementation and Verification of Dynamic Analysis Models for Multi-Spherical Sliding Bearings. State University of New York at Buffalo.
9.
FitozHE (2012) Response of Asymmetric Isolated Buildings Under Bidirectional Excitations of Near-Fault Ground Motions. Middle East Technical University.
10.
GiammonaAPRyanKLDaoND (2015) Evaluation of assumptions used in engineering practice to model buildings isolated with triple pendulum isolators in SAP2000. Earthquake Spectra31(2): 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1193/090213eqs242m
11.
HabibAYildirimU (2023a) Influence of isolator properties and earthquake characteristics on the seismic behavior of RC structure equipped with quintuple friction pendulum bearings. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics23(06): 2350060. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455423500608
12.
HabibAYildirimU (2023b) Modeling reinforced concrete moment frames supported on quintuple friction pendulum bearings for nonlinear response history analysis. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami17(02): 2350002. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793431123500021
13.
HabibAAL HouriAMaalejM, et al. (2025) Bidirectional modeling and investigation of quintuple friction pendulum isolators subjected to various seismic excitations. Advances in Civil Engineering2025(1): 6660096. https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/6660096
14.
JalaliYAmiriGGShakouriA (2021) Comparative response assessment of base-isolated braced-frame buildings considering effects of ductility design. Journal of Building Engineering43: 103110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103110
15.
JangidRKellyJ (2001) Base isolation for near‐fault motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics30(5): 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.31
16.
KeikhaHAmiriGG (2023) Developing a simplified method for analysis and design of isolated structures with the novel quintuple friction pendulum system under bidirectional near-field excitations. Journal of Vibration and Control29(1–2): 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463211048261
17.
KeikhaHGhodrati AmiriG (2021a) Numerical development and assessment of 3D quintuple friction pendulum isolator element based on its analytical and mathematical models. Journal of Earthquake Engineering25(13): 2718–2757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1643808
18.
KeikhaHGhodrati AmiriG (2021b) Seismic performance assessment of quintuple friction pendulum isolator with a focus on frictional behavior impressionability from velocity and temperature. Journal of Earthquake Engineering25(7): 1256–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1568929
19.
KimH-MConstantinouMC (2022) Modeling Triple Friction Pendulum bearings in program OpenSees including frictional heating effects. MCEER-22-0001. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
MajdiASadeghi-MovahhedAKontoniD-PN, et al. (2025) On critical pounding mechanism of base-isolated buildings using an optimized multi-hazard method. Results in Engineering27: 106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106533
22.
McVittyW. J.ConstantinouM.CMultidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (2015) Property modification factors for seismic isolators: Design guidance for buildings. MCEER-15 0005.
23.
RezaeiSAmiriGGNamiranianP (2014) Effects of triple pendulum bearing on seismic response of isolated buildings under near-field excitations.SECOND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SEISMOLOGY, ISTANBUL AUG.25–29.
24.
Sadeghi-MovahhedADe DomenicoDMajdiA (2024) Structural flexibility impact on pounding severity and seismic performance of adjacent isolated buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering181: 108667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108667
25.
Sadeghi-MovahhedADe DomenicoDMashayekhiM, et al. (2025) Optimal damping of isolated tall buildings accounting for structural and nonstructural damage. Journal of Building Engineering105: 112497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112497
26.
ShakouriAAmiriGGSalehiM (2021) Effects of ductility and connection design on seismic responses of base-isolated steel moment-resisting frames. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering143: 106647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106647
27.
SodhaASoniDDesaiM, et al. (2017) Behavior of quintuple friction pendulum system under near-fault earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami11(05): 1750017. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793431117500178
28.
SodhaA.VasanwalaS. A.D. Soni. (2019) Probabilistic evaluation of seismically isolated building using quintuple friction pendulum isolator, Innov. Infrastruct. Springer:149–159.
29.
SodhaAHSoniDPVasanwalaSA (2021) Evaluation of linear visco-elastic model of quintuple friction pendulum isolator. International Journal of Structural Engineering11(1): 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijstructe.2021.112090
30.
TajammolianHKhoshnoudianFRadAR, et al.(2018) Seismic Fragility Assessment of Asymmetric Structures Supported on TCFP Bearings Subjected to Near-Field Earthquakes. Structures13: 66-78. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.11.004
31.
WeberFDistlHBraunC (2016) Isolation performance of optimized triple friction pendulum. Int. Refereed J. Eng. Sci5(12): 55–69.
32.
XuYBeckerTCGuoT (2021) Design optimization of triple friction pendulums for high-rise buildings considering both seismic and wind loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering142: 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106568
33.
XuYGuoTXiongJ, et al.(2022) Optimization Design of Triple Friction Pendulums for Base-Isolated High-Rise Buildings Based on Bearing Displacement and Collapse Fragility. Structures43: 1091-1099. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.009
34.
XuYGuoTChenB, et al. (2025) Predicting seismic isolation performance of the building isolated with triple friction pendulums using machine learning. Journal of Building Engineering112: 113565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113565
35.
ZhangJShuZ (2018) Optimal design of isolation devices for mid-rise steel moment frames using performance based methodology. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering16(9): 4315–4338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0321-0
