Load swing suppression remains a critical challenge in underactuated crane systems, especially when arbitrary initial oscillations and strict sway constraints are involved. This paper proposes an enhanced zero vibration constraint command shaping (EZVCCS) method to address this problem. The method explicitly incorporates swing constraints into the shaping process, enabling precise trajectory planning while ensuring terminal state satisfaction. A systematic investigation examines the effects of maneuvering time, velocity constraints, input step number, and sway constraints on system performance. The EZVCCS method supports arbitrary initial and terminal conditions, unlike the traditional ones. This allows maneuvers that are flexible point-to-point even in cases where the sway requirement is stringent. Moreover, it unifies and extends existing command shaping strategies: with a small input step number, it reproduces the acceleration characteristics of zero-vibration (ZV) and zero-vibration-derivative (ZVD) shapers, while delivering improved suppression of initial sway and guaranteed terminal-state accuracy under the imposed constraints. With larger step numbers, the piecewise-constant command attains finer shaping resolution and can closely approximate the closed-form command shaping (CFCS) method, while the embedded constraints enable stricter sway regulation. Overall, the EZVCCS method offers a unified solution that balances sway suppression and computational efficiency, demonstrating strong potential for practical crane applications.
AbdullahiAMMohamedZZainal AbidinM, et al. (2017) Output-based command shaping technique for an effective payload sway control of a 3D crane with hoisting. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control39: 1443–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331216640871
3.
AbdullahiAMMohamedZSelamatH, et al. (2018) Adaptive output-based command shaping for sway control of a 3D overhead crane with payload hoisting and wind disturbance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing98: 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.04.034
4.
AlfaresMAlhazzaK (2024) A new designed fixed output response method to generate a general closed-form waveform command shaper for controlling SDOF time-independent or time-dependent dynamic systems. Journal of Vibration and Control: 10775463251357665. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463251357665
5.
AlhazzaKAMasoudZNAlqabandiJA (2022) A close-form command shaping control for point-to-point maneuver with nonzero initial and final conditions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing170: 108804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108804
6.
AlshayaAA (2023) Vibration control of time-varying nonlinear systems. In: International Conference on Nonlinear Dynamics and Applications. Springer, pp. 15–24.
7.
AlshayaAAlghanimK (2020) Command shaping for sloshing suppression of a suspended liquid container. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control142: 121003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047957
8.
AlshayaAAlshayjiA (2022) Robust multi-steps input command for liquid sloshing control. Journal of Vibration and Control28: 2607–2624. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463211017721
9.
AlshayaAAlSaibieAAlshayjiA (2025) Three-dimensional sloshing control of a planar-conveyed rectangular container using an adjustable-smooth robust command. Control Engineering Practice164: 106503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106503
10.
CaoMXuMGaoY, et al. (2025) Dynamic output feedback antiswing control for bridge cranes with input constraints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science16: 09544062251326441.
11.
GuoQChaiLLiuH (2023) Anti-swing sliding mode control of three-dimensional double pendulum overhead cranes based on extended state observer. Nonlinear Dynamics111: 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07859-9
12.
HuangWNiuWZhouX, et al. (2024) Anti-sway control of variable rope length container crane based on phase plane trajectory planning. Journal of Vibration and Control30: 1227–1240. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463231158430
13.
HuangWLuBWengC, et al. (2025a) Active disturbance rejection control with phase plane trajectory planning for overhead cranes. Journal of Sound and Vibration621: 119451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119451
14.
HuangWLuBWengC, et al. (2025b) Improved waveform command shaping anti-sway control for arbitrary initial and terminal conditions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing241: 113547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113547
15.
JebellatISharfI (2024) Motion planners for path or waypoint following and end-effector sway damping with dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.
16.
KudaraKTakahashiHNakayamaH, et al. (2025) Two-stage S-curve trajectory generation for time-optimal, anti-sway crane-rotation with jib-luffing and rope hoisting. Automation in Construction177: 106339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106339
17.
LeiMWuXZhangY, et al. (2023) Super-twisting disturbance-observer-based nonlinear control of the overhead crane system. Nonlinear Dynamics111: 14015–14025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08596-3
18.
LiDHuSXingS, et al. (2025) PD sliding mode trajectory tracking control method for a double-pendulum bridge crane considering initial input saturation. Journal of Vibration and Control1: 10775463251338569. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463251338569
19.
MaghsoudiMRamliLSudinS, et al. (2019) Improved unity magnitude input shaping scheme for sway control of an underactuated 3D overhead crane with hoisting. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing123: 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.056
20.
MajeedMAAlaliMAlghanimK, et al. (2025) Integrated time-optimal rigid-body and zero-vibration shapers on a two degrees of freedom overhead crane system. Journal of Vibration and Control31: 2340–2350. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463241257743
21.
MatsuiKKajiwaraH (2022) Feedforward control input generation method for a crane system with restrictions on drive system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing170: 108865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108865
22.
MiaoXZhaoBWangL, et al. (2022) Trolley regulation and swing reduction of underactuated double-pendulum overhead cranes using fuzzy adaptive nonlinear control. Nonlinear Dynamics109: 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07465-9
23.
MohammedAAlghanimKAndaniMT (2021) A robust input shaper for trajectory control of overhead cranes with non-zero initial states. International Journal of Dynamics Control9: 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-020-00631-0
24.
MohammedAAltuwaisHAlghanimK (2023) An optimized shaped command of overhead crane nonlinear system for rest-to-rest maneuver. Journal of Engineering Research11: 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.08.012
25.
MojallizadehMRBrogliatoBPrieurC (2023) Modeling and control of overhead cranes: a tutorial overview and perspectives. Annual Reviews in Control56: 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.002
26.
NguyenNPOhHMoonJ (2024) Continuous integral-type sliding mode tracking control of under-actuated cranes: theory and experiments. Nonlinear Dynamics112: 16295–16313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-09891-3
27.
OuyangHXuXGanbatT, et al. (2021) Nonlinear-adaptive-based swing reduction control for rotary cranes with double-pendulum effect considering uncertain parameters and external disturbances. Automation in Construction126: 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103668
28.
RamliLMohamedZAbdullahiAM, et al. (2017) Control strategies for crane systems: a comprehensive review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing95: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.015
29.
RamliLMohamedZJaafarH (2018) A neural network-based input shaping for swing suppression of an overhead crane under payload hoisting and mass variations. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing107: 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.029
30.
RamliLMohamedZEfeM, et al. (2020) Efficient swing control of an overhead crane with simultaneous payload hoisting and external disturbances. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing135: 106326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106326
31.
SinghoseW (2009) Command shaping for flexible systems: a review of the first 50 years. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing10: 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-009-0084-2
32.
SuksabaiNChuckpaiwongI (2023) Input-shaped model reference control using sliding mode design for sway suppression of an industrial overhead crane. Engineering Journal27: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2023.27.2.1
33.
SunZOuyangH (2022) Adaptive fuzzy tracking control for vibration suppression of tower crane with distributed payload mass. Automation in Construction142: 104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104521
34.
SunNFangYZhangY, et al. (2011) A novel kinematic coupling-based trajectory planning method for overhead cranes. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics17: 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2010.2103085
35.
SyazwinAFaizzahWARamliL, et al. (2024) Swing control of 2D overhead crane using proportional integral derivative neural network. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS). IEEE,pp. 77–82.
36.
TayefiMGengZ (2018) Self-balancing controlled Lagrangian and geometric control of unmanned mobile robots. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems90: 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0666-7
37.
UchidaANodaYKaneshigeA (2024) Trajectory control with consideration of vibration suppression in straight transfer system with arbitrary initial state. In: 2024 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, pp. 339–344.
38.
WangTZhouJZhangQ, et al. (2023) Design of adaptive time-varying sliding mode controller for underactuated overhead crane optimized via improved honey badger algorithm. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems108: 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-023-01907-1
39.
WangKMaXLiJ (2024) Neural network-based adaptive swing suppression control for tower cranes with obstacle avoidance. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.
40.
YangTSunNChenH, et al. (2019) Neural network-based adaptive antiswing control of an underactuated ship-mounted crane with roll motions and input dead zones. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems31: 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2019.2910580
41.
YaoJHuS (2024) Adaptive trajectory tracking anti-swing control strategy with gain self-tuning for 3D overhead cranes with payload hoisting and lowering. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part I: Journal of Systems & Control Engineering239: 09596518251341929.
42.
YaoFTianGWuA, et al. (2024a) A high-order fully actuated system approach to control of overhead cranes. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.
43.
YaoFWuA-GGolestaniM, et al. (2024b) Adaptive tracking control for underactuated double pendulum overhead cranes with variable cable length. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.
44.
ZhangXFangYSunN (2014) Minimum-time trajectory planning for underactuated overhead crane systems with state and control constraints. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics61: 6915–6925. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2014.2320231
45.
ZhangMMaXRongX, et al. (2017) Error tracking control for underactuated overhead cranes against arbitrary initial payload swing angles. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing84: 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.07.028
46.
ZhangJZhangQZhangL, et al. (2024a) Anti-swing control of varying rope length tower crane based on adaptive neural network sliding mode. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics238: 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644193241256857
47.
ZhangMJingXZhouZ, et al. (2024b) Transportation for 4-DOF tower cranes: a periodic sliding mode control approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems25: 15909–15921. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2024.3412158
48.
ZhengZXuW (2025) Robust adaptive decoupled-like sliding mode controller design based on iterative learning for overhead cranes. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control47: 980–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312241257024
