This study investigates how hospital electronic medical record (EMR) use influences quality performance. Data include nonfederal acute care hospitals in the United States. Sources of the data include the American Hospital Association, Hospital Quality Alliance, the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services case-mix index sets. The authors use a retrospective cross-sectional format with linear regression to assess the relationship between hospital EMR use and quality performance. Quality performance is measured using 10 process indicators related to 3 clinical conditions: acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia. The authors also use a propensity score adjustment to control for possible selection bias. After this adjustment, the authors identify a positive significant relationship between EMR use and 4 of the 10 quality indicators. They conclude that there is limited evidence of the relationship between hospital EMR use and quality.
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality. (2004 ). Introduction to health care quality. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.achp.org/page.asp?page_id=445
2.
Anderson, G.F., Frogner, B.K., Johns, R.A., & Reinhardt, U.E. (2006). Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. The United States is an outlier in both its health spending and its use of health information technology. Health Affairs, 25(3), 819-831.
3.
Anderson, G.K. (2004). Preventive medicine and the electronic health record. Medscape Public Health and Prevention, 2.
4.
Asch, S.M., McGlynn, E.A., Hogan, M.M., Hayward, R.A., Shekelle, P., Rubenstein, L., et al. (2004). Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(12), 938-945.
5.
Ash, J.S., & Bates, D.W. (2004). Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report on a 2004 ACMI discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(1), 8-12.
6.
Brailer, D.G. (2005). Interoperability: The key to the future health care system interoperability will bind together a wide network of real-time, life-critical data that not only transform but become health care. Health Affairs WebExclusive, W5-19-W5-21.
7.
Burt, C.W., & Hing, E. (2005). Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001-2003. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics of the CDC, 353, 1-8.
8.
Coyte, P.C., Young, W., & Croxford, R. (2000). Costs and outcomes associated with alternative discharge strategies following joint replacement surgery: Analysis of an observational study using a propensity score. Journal of Health Economics , 19(6), 907-929.
9.
Cushman, R. (1997). Serious technology assessment for health care information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(4), 259-265.
10.
Donabedian, A. (1980). Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: Volume I the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press .
11.
Fonkych, K., & Taylor, R. (2005). The state and pattern of health information technology adoption. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
12.
Ginn, G.O., & Young, G.J. (1992). Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital strategy. Hospital and Health Services Administration , 37(3), 291-302.
13.
Health Information Management Systems Society Foundation. (2004). HIMSS analytics user guide and data dictionary final release. Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.himss.org/DorenfestInstitute/default.aspx
14.
Health Information Management Systems Society Foundation. (2005). HIMSS annual report of the US hospital IT market . Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.himss.org/DorenfestInstitute/docs/HimssAnalyticsAnnualReport.pdf
15.
Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., Girosi, F., Meili, R., Scoville, R., et al. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1103-1117.
16.
Hospital Quality Alliance Overview Summary. (2005). Retrieved March 4, 2006, from www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/
17.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press .
18.
Jha, A.K., Li, Z., Orav, E.J., & Epstein, A.M. (2005). Care in U.S. hospitals-The hospital quality alliance program. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353(3), 265-274.
19.
Kinn, J.W., O'Toole, M.F., Rowley, S.M., Marek, J.C., Bufalino, V.J., & Brown, S.A. (2001). Effectiveness of the electronic medical record in cholesterol management in patients with coronary artery disease (Virtual Lipid Clinic). The American Journal of Cardiology, 88(2), 163-165.
20.
Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., & Donaldson, M.S. (1999). To err is human. Washington, DC: National Academy Press .
21.
Leapfrog Group for Patient Safety. (2007). Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.leapfroggroup.org/for_hospitals/leapfrog_safety_practices/cpoe
22.
Linder, J.A., Ma, J., Bates, D.W., Middleton, B., & Stafford, R.S. (2007). Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(13), 1400-1405.
23.
Lynk, W.J. (2001). One DRG, one price? The effect of patient condition on price variation within DRGs and across hospitals. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 1(2), 111-137.
24.
Mick, S.S., & Wyttenbach, M.E. (2003). Advances in health care organization theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Milcent, C. (2005). Hospital ownership, reimbursement systems and mortality rates. Health Economics, 14(11), 1151-1168.
26.
Miller, R.H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians' use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116-126.
27.
Paganini, J.M. (1993). Quality and efficiency of hospital care: The relationship between structure, process, and outcome. Washington, DC : Pan American Health Organization, The World Health Organization.
28.
Poon, E.G., Jha, A.K., Christino, M., Honour, M., Fernandopulle, R., Middleton, B., et al. (2006). Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: A snapshot. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6(1), 1-9.
29.
Rubin, D.B. (1997). Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(8 Pt. 2), 757-763.
30.
Schmitt, K.F., & Wofford, A.D. (2002). Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. Healthcare Financial Management , 56(1), 52-57.
31.
Scott, W.R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
Shortliffe, E.H. (1999). The evolution of electronic medical records. Academic Medicine, 74(4), 414-419.
33.
Spencer, E., Swanson, T., Hueston, W.J., & Edberg, D.L. (1999). Tools to improve documentation of smoking status, continuous quality improvement and electronic medical records. Archives of Family Medicine, 8(1), 18-22.
34.
Starfield, B. (1992). Primary care: Concept, evaluation, and policy . New York: Oxford University Press .
35.
Stearns, S.C., Dalton, K., Holmes, G.M., & Seagrave, S.M. (2006). Using propensity stratification to compare patient outcomes in hospital-based versus freestanding skilled-nursing facilities. Medical Care Research and Review, 5(5), 599-622.
36.
Thompson, T.J., & Brailer, D.G. (2004). The decade of health information technology: Delivering consumer-centric and information-rich health care framework for strategic action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
37.
Varon, J., & Marik, P.E. (2002). Clinical information system and the electronic medical record in the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 8(6), 616-624.
38.
Werner, R.M., & Bradlow, E.T. (2006). Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(22), 2694-2702.
39.
Zinn, J.S., Proenca, J., & Rosko, M.D. (1997). Organizational and environmental factors in a hospital alliance membership and contract management: A resource-dependence perspective. Hospital and Health Services Administration, 42(1), 67-86.
