Recent research suggests hospitals serving low-income patients have poorer outcomes. However, safety net hospitals (SNHs) offering access to care regardless of insurance coverage may provide better care than low-income patients would otherwise receive. This study considers the association between insurance and mortality among surgical cancer patients and the role of SNHs. We estimate models of 1- and 5-year mortality on insurance, SNH status, patient characteristics, and hospital surgical volume for colorectal and breast cancer patients. Interaction terms between insurance and SNH status estimate how mortality differs by insurance source at SNHs. Medicaid and uninsurance are associated with significantly higher mortality for colorectal cancer patients. There is a statistically significant improvement in mortality for Medicaid colorectal cancer patients treated in SNHs relative to non-SNHs and a marginally significant improvement for uninsured breast cancer patients treated in SNHs. The results suggest a survival benefit for low-income patients treated in SNHs.
AbdullahF.ZhangY.LardaroT.BlackM.ColombaniP. M.ChrouserK.. . . ChangD. C. (2009). Analysis of 23 million US hospitalizations: Uninsured children have higher all-cause in-hospital mortality. Journal of Public Health, 32, 236-244.
2.
AiC.NortonE. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123-129.
3.
AndersonR. J.BoumbulianP. J.PickensS. S. (2004). The role of U.S. public hospitals in urban health. Academic Medicine, 79, 1162-1168.
4.
AyanianJ. Z.WeissmanJ. S.SchneiderE. C.GinsburgJ. A.ZaslavskyA. M. (2000). Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2061-2069.
5.
BakerD. W.ShapiroM. F.SchurC. L. (2000). Health insurance and access to care for symptomatic conditions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 1269-1274.
6.
BradleyC. J.DahmanB.ShickleL.LeeW. (2012). Surgery wait times and specialty services for insured and uninsured breast cancer patients: Does hospital safety net status matter?Health Services Research, 47, 677-697.
BradleyC. J.GivenC. W.RobertsC. (2001). Disparities in cancer diagnosis and survival. Cancer, 91, 178-188.
9.
BradleyC. J.GivenC. W.RobertsC. (2002). Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94, 490-496.
10.
CharlsonM. E.PompeiP.AlesK. L.MacKenzieC. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40, 373-383.
11.
ChienL.-N.AdamsE. K.YangZ. (2011). Medicaid enrollment at early stage of disease: The Breast and Cervical Prevention and Treatment Act in Georgia. Inquiry, 48, 197-208.
DeyoR. A.CherkinD. C.CiolM. A. (1992). Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 613-619.
14.
GoldmanL. E.VittinghoffE.DudleyR. A. (2007). Quality of care in hospitals with a high percent of Medicaid patients. Medical Care Research and Review, 45, 579-583.
15.
HadleyJ. (2003). Sicker and poorer—The consequences of being uninsured: A review of the research on the relationship between health insurance, medical care use, health, work, and income. Medical Care Research and Review, 60(2), 3S-75S.
16.
HadleyJ.SteinbergE. P.FederJ. (1991). Comparison of uninsured and privately insured hospital patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 265, 374-379.
17.
HalpernM. T.WardE. M.PavluckA. L.SchragN. M.BianJ.ChenA. Y. (2008). Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: A retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncology, 9, 222-231.
18.
Hasnain-WyniaR.BakerD. W.NerenzD.FeinglassJ.BealA. C.LandrumM. B.. . . WeissmanJ. S. (2007). Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: Examination of the hospital quality alliance measures. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167, 1233-1239.
19.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Coverage matters: Insurance and health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
JhaA. K.OravE. J.EpsteinA. M. (2011). Low-quality, high-cost hospitals, mainly in south, care for sharply higher shares of elderly black, Hispanic, and Medicaid patients. Health Affairs, 30, 1904-1911.
Karaca-MandicP.NortonE. C.DowdB. (2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47(1 Pt. 1), 255-274.
23.
KuL.JonesE.ShinP.ByrneF. R.LongS. K. (2011). Safety-net providers after health care reform: Lessons from Massachusetts. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171, 1379-1384.
24.
LewinM. E.AltmanS. (2000). America’s health care safety Net: Intact but endangered. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
RhoadsK. F.AckersonL. K.JhaA. K.DudleyR. A. (2008). Quality of colon cancer outcomes in hospitals with a high percentage of Medicaid patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 207, 197-204.
28.
ShenJ. J.WanT. T.PerlinJ. B. (2001). An exploration of the complex relationships of socioecologic factors in the treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in disadvantaged populations. Health Services Research, 36, 711-732.
29.
WardE.HalpernM.SchragN.CokkinidesV.DeSantisC.BandiP.. . . JemalA. (2008). Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA—A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 58(1), 9-31.
30.
WernerR. M.GoldmanL. E.DudleyR. A. (2008). Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non safety-net hospitals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 2180-2187.
31.
ZwanzigerJ.KhanN.BamezaiA. (2010). The relationship between safety net activities and hospital financial performance. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 15.
